From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6475ECE58C for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 10:34:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76D822084C for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 10:34:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=armlinux.org.uk header.i=@armlinux.org.uk header.b="iPIcDDch" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727739AbfJKKd7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Oct 2019 06:33:59 -0400 Received: from pandora.armlinux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:59008 "EHLO pandora.armlinux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726290AbfJKKd5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Oct 2019 06:33:57 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=armlinux.org.uk; s=pandora-2019; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=wiz4slvf1z02zzwamxtNr+wkEajcyA8vgoY7rPowzHY=; b=iPIcDDchS+lDan8D2NcJ447cX di0PD/1ruOXInVaPPqA+Ot4vUoLVncIvIzB0n9p+50ITyo6Sh1lCyMRhHeSh9ljdNwqvBN/jSANIM L5fiFMgmAdRHp9Q0DcumTYuUEj0/8Isj77eXe8AL80lkhdk/zOFvSMCEG/lybpjQRXOePNUjby9z7 SBg8chnrDkYgAzMDxyr1cn1jDcra3l7BCZaS7RCSGOCt8BX5ULxR9gR1zuKH6jJTMkhYTJUaYyT0G +J5AQkFZmOl84mhGTLB5ly9D8lo3wzRSrY0hfcvW7QP2KbJdjmIwejVbTYhSEdVaNNmQpNgjnzNgs lQfym6qIA==; Received: from shell.armlinux.org.uk ([2001:4d48:ad52:3201:5054:ff:fe00:4ec]:42728) by pandora.armlinux.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iIsF1-0004dD-4o; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 11:33:47 +0100 Received: from linux by shell.armlinux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iIsEw-00013D-PC; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 11:33:42 +0100 Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 11:33:42 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin To: Will Deacon Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Anders Roxell , Catalin Marinas , John Garry , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Olof Johansson , Linux ARM Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: configs: unset CPU_BIG_ENDIAN Message-ID: <20191011103342.GL25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> References: <20190926193030.5843-1-anders.roxell@linaro.org> <20190926193030.5843-5-anders.roxell@linaro.org> <20191011102747.lpbaur2e4nqyf7sw@willie-the-truck> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191011102747.lpbaur2e4nqyf7sw@willie-the-truck> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 11:27:48AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > Does anybody use BIG_ENDIAN? If we're not even building it then maybe we > should get rid of it altogether on arm64. I don't know of any supported > userspace that supports it or any CPUs that are unable to run little-endian > binaries. 32-bit ARM experience is that telco class users really like big endian. -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up