From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C212ECE58E for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 14:27:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75FF82089C for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 14:27:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="KSqc/zaD" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732793AbfJNO1v (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Oct 2019 10:27:51 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:55168 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732589AbfJNO1v (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Oct 2019 10:27:51 -0400 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300EC2F065800329C23FFFEA6A903.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f06:5800:329c:23ff:fea6:a903]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id DC5C21EC06FB; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 16:27:49 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1571063270; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=xnAbQTxxzd5rIOcOu5tUVs/ScOLib3p+kaJk8MwESRY=; b=KSqc/zaDPn6v9D5UIZq9wrxPldVUwvdMSEseyWU7S5Wq/+7aEXMA7XiWEAm3lz9KWt35s7 TCA02Fe5YQlnylwhNI0ui27bYkekf7quKcxw2ZwFDr4y0ZfIvvkSwdMtoDbXG0IIAskTJb SB+xxSNls49Nxb1eG9A3O9cgVQ24noY= Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 16:27:42 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Jiri Slaby Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 07/28] x86/boot: Annotate local functions Message-ID: <20191014142742.GD4715@zn.tnic> References: <20191011115108.12392-1-jslaby@suse.cz> <20191011115108.12392-8-jslaby@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191011115108.12392-8-jslaby@suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 01:50:47PM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote: > .Lrelocated, .Lpaging_enabled, .Lno_longmode, and .Lin_pm32 are > self-standing local functions, annotate them as such and preserve "no > alignment". > > The annotations do not generate anything yet. So the annotation is only documentational, right? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette