From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFT][PATCH 0/3] cpufreq / PM: QoS: Introduce frequency QoS and use it in cpufreq
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 13:57:45 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191018082745.3zr6tc3yqmbydkrw@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0hpfvy5iELVRWFA3HS8NoAH0=py0cE+fLaUq2hDReCrnQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 18-10-19, 10:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 7:44 AM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 17-10-19, 18:34, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > [BTW, Viresh, it looks like cpufreq_set_policy() should still ensure
> > > that the new min is less than the new max, because the QoS doesn't do
> > > that.]
> >
> > The ->verify() callback does that for us I believe.
>
> It does in practice AFAICS, but in theory it may assume the right
> ordering between the min and the max and just test the boundaries, may
> it not?
I think cpufreq_verify_within_limits() gets called for sure from
within ->verify() for all platforms and this explicitly checks
if (policy->min > policy->max)
policy->min = policy->max;
--
viresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-18 8:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-16 10:37 [RFT][PATCH 0/3] cpufreq / PM: QoS: Introduce frequency QoS and use it in cpufreq Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-16 10:41 ` [RFT][PATCH 1/3] PM: QoS: Introduce frequency QoS Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-17 9:41 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-10-17 14:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-18 5:41 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-10-24 19:01 ` Leonard Crestez
2019-10-24 19:34 ` Leonard Crestez
2019-11-17 7:34 ` Doug Smythies
2019-11-17 16:13 ` Doug Smythies
2019-11-19 14:35 ` Doug Smythies
2019-11-19 19:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-11-19 22:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-11-20 6:55 ` Doug Smythies
2019-11-20 9:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-16 10:47 ` [RFT][PATCH 2/3] cpufreq: Use per-policy " Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-16 18:01 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2019-10-17 21:29 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2019-10-18 9:29 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-10-18 15:31 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2019-10-16 10:47 ` [RFT][PATCH 3/3] PM: QoS: Drop frequency QoS types from device PM QoS Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-16 14:23 ` [RFT][PATCH 0/3] cpufreq / PM: QoS: Introduce frequency QoS and use it in cpufreq Sudeep Holla
2019-10-17 9:57 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-10-17 9:59 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-10-17 16:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-17 16:42 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-10-18 5:44 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-10-18 8:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-18 8:27 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2019-10-18 8:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-18 9:24 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-10-18 9:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-18 9:28 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-10-17 17:14 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-10-17 9:46 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191018082745.3zr6tc3yqmbydkrw@vireshk-i7 \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=digetx@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).