linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Cc: arnd@arndb.de, broonie@kernel.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, baohua@kernel.org,
	stephan@gerhold.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] mfd: mfd-core: Protect against NULL call-back function pointer
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 13:40:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191021124027.GG4365@dell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191021123235.royyfp4mxrvsgioh@holly.lan>

On Mon, 21 Oct 2019, Daniel Thompson wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 11:58:20AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > If a child device calls mfd_cell_{en,dis}able() without an appropriate
> > call-back being set, we are likely to encounter a panic.  Avoid this
> > by adding suitable checking.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c | 10 ++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c b/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c
> > index 8126665bb2d8..90b43b44a15a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c
> > @@ -28,6 +28,11 @@ int mfd_cell_enable(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  	const struct mfd_cell *cell = mfd_get_cell(pdev);
> >  	int err = 0;
> >  
> > +	if (!cell->enable) {
> > +		dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "No .enable() call-back registered\n");
> > +		return 0;
> > +	}
> > +
> >  	/* only call enable hook if the cell wasn't previously enabled */
> >  	if (atomic_inc_return(cell->usage_count) == 1)
> >  		err = cell->enable(pdev);
> > @@ -45,6 +50,11 @@ int mfd_cell_disable(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  	const struct mfd_cell *cell = mfd_get_cell(pdev);
> >  	int err = 0;
> >  
> > +	if (!cell->enable) {
> 
> Oops.
> 
> Cancel the R-B: ;-). Shouldn't this be !cell->disable() ?

Yes. Looks like a C/P error.

Will fix and add your R-b.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-21 12:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-21 10:58 [PATCH v2 0/9] Simplify MFD Core Lee Jones
2019-10-21 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] mfd: cs5535-mfd: Use PLATFORM_DEVID_* defines and tidy error message Lee Jones
2019-10-21 11:15   ` Daniel Thompson
2019-10-21 11:33     ` Lee Jones
2019-10-21 11:35       ` Lee Jones
2019-10-21 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] mfd: cs5535-mfd: Remove mfd_cell->id hack Lee Jones
2019-10-21 11:11   ` Daniel Thompson
2019-10-21 11:46     ` Lee Jones
2019-10-21 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] mfd: cs5535-mfd: Request shared IO regions centrally Lee Jones
2019-10-21 12:26   ` Daniel Thompson
2019-10-21 12:46     ` Lee Jones
2019-10-21 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] mfd: cs5535-mfd: Register clients using their own dedicated MFD cell entries Lee Jones
2019-10-21 12:29   ` Daniel Thompson
2019-10-21 13:21     ` Lee Jones
2019-10-21 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] mfd: mfd-core: Remove mfd_clone_cell() Lee Jones
2019-10-21 12:29   ` Daniel Thompson
2019-10-21 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] x86: olpc: Remove invocation of MFD's .enable()/.disable() call-backs Lee Jones
2019-10-21 12:17   ` Daniel Thompson
2019-10-21 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] mfd: mfd-core: Protect against NULL call-back function pointer Lee Jones
2019-10-21 12:30   ` Daniel Thompson
2019-10-21 12:32   ` Daniel Thompson
2019-10-21 12:40     ` Lee Jones [this message]
2019-10-21 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] mfd: mfd-core: Remove usage counting for .{en,dis}able() call-backs Lee Jones
2019-10-21 12:33   ` Daniel Thompson
2019-10-21 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] mfd: mfd-core: Move pdev->mfd_cell creation back into mfd_add_device() Lee Jones
2019-10-21 12:45   ` Daniel Thompson
2019-10-21 11:29 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] Simplify MFD Core Arnd Bergmann
2019-10-21 11:39   ` Lee Jones
2019-10-21 11:44   ` Lubomir Rintel
2019-10-21 11:53     ` Lee Jones
2019-10-21 12:21       ` Lubomir Rintel
2019-10-21 13:01         ` Lee Jones
2019-11-01  9:07         ` Lee Jones
2019-11-01 15:01           ` Lubomir Rintel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191021124027.GG4365@dell \
    --to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stephan@gerhold.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).