linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, "Michael ." <keltoiboy@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Trevor Jacobs <trevor_jacobs@aol.com>,
	Kris Cleveland <tridentperfusion@yahoo.com>,
	Jeff <bluerocksaddles@willitsonline.com>,
	Morgan Klym <moklym@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: PCI device function not being enumerated [Was: PCMCIA not working on Panasonic Toughbook CF-29]
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 11:09:52 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191021160952.GA229204@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191020090800.GA2778@light.dominikbrodowski.net>

On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 11:08:00AM +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> On the basis of the additional information (thanks), there might be a
> more specific path to investigate: It is that the PCI code does not
> enumerate the second cardbus bridge PCI function in the more recent 4.19
> kernel compared to the anvient (and working) 2.6 kernel.
> 
> Namely, only one CardBus bridge is recognized
> 
> ...
> 06:01.0 CardBus bridge: Ricoh Co Ltd RL5c476 II (rev 8b)
> 06:01.1 SD Host controller: Ricoh Co Ltd R5C822 SD/SDIO/MMC/MS/MSPro Host Adapter (rev 11)
> 06:02.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 2915ABG [Calexico2] Network Connection (rev 05)
> ...
> 
> instead of the two which really should be present:
> 
> ...
> 06:01.0 CardBus bridge: Ricoh Co Ltd RL5c476 II (rev 8b)
> 06:01.1 CardBus bridge: Ricoh Co Ltd RL5c476 II (rev 8b)
> 06:01.2 SD Host controller: Ricoh Co Ltd R5C822 SD/SDIO/MMC/MS/MSPro Host Adapter (rev 11)
> 06:02.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 2915ABG [Calexico2] Network Connection (rev 05)
> ...
> 
> To the PCI folks: any idea on what may cause the second cardbus bridge PCI
> device function to be missed? Are there any command line options the users
> who reported this issue[*] may try?

Thanks for the report.  Could you try disabling
ricoh_mmc_fixup_rl5c476(), e.g., with the patch below (this is based
on v5.4-rc1, but you can use v4.9 if that's easier for you)?  This
isn't a fix; it's just something that looks like it might be related.

> [*] For more information, see this thread:
> 	https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAFjuqNi+knSb9WVQOahCVFyxsiqoGgwoM7Z1aqDBebNzp_-jYw@mail.gmail.com/


diff --git a/drivers/pci/quirks.c b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
index 320255e5e8f8..7a1e1a242506 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/quirks.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
@@ -3036,38 +3036,6 @@ DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_HINT, 0x0020, quirk_hotplug_bridge);
  * #1, and this will confuse the PCI core.
  */
 #ifdef CONFIG_MMC_RICOH_MMC
-static void ricoh_mmc_fixup_rl5c476(struct pci_dev *dev)
-{
-	u8 write_enable;
-	u8 write_target;
-	u8 disable;
-
-	/*
-	 * Disable via CardBus interface
-	 *
-	 * This must be done via function #0
-	 */
-	if (PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn))
-		return;
-
-	pci_read_config_byte(dev, 0xB7, &disable);
-	if (disable & 0x02)
-		return;
-
-	pci_read_config_byte(dev, 0x8E, &write_enable);
-	pci_write_config_byte(dev, 0x8E, 0xAA);
-	pci_read_config_byte(dev, 0x8D, &write_target);
-	pci_write_config_byte(dev, 0x8D, 0xB7);
-	pci_write_config_byte(dev, 0xB7, disable | 0x02);
-	pci_write_config_byte(dev, 0x8E, write_enable);
-	pci_write_config_byte(dev, 0x8D, write_target);
-
-	pci_notice(dev, "proprietary Ricoh MMC controller disabled (via CardBus function)\n");
-	pci_notice(dev, "MMC cards are now supported by standard SDHCI controller\n");
-}
-DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_RICOH, PCI_DEVICE_ID_RICOH_RL5C476, ricoh_mmc_fixup_rl5c476);
-DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_RESUME_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_RICOH, PCI_DEVICE_ID_RICOH_RL5C476, ricoh_mmc_fixup_rl5c476);
-
 static void ricoh_mmc_fixup_r5c832(struct pci_dev *dev)
 {
 	u8 write_enable;

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-21 16:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CAFjuqNh1=B7Ft6v7nzo3BW70EbAvK=Eko_4yqrJ4Z4N3w_Y+Xw@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found] ` <CAFjuqNjLJw8J0nU2oo8rDfDUBavHLC7D0=AAwM62tp6=kHHk-A@mail.gmail.com>
2019-10-15  6:48   ` PCMCIA not working on Panasonic Toughbook CF-29 Dominik Brodowski
2019-10-15  7:03     ` Michael .
     [not found]       ` <CANfzparZ17SMzE1qzzF=Rixu=aYpf1RiKqR4KXXS0S+u7Q3TwQ@mail.gmail.com>
2019-10-20  9:08         ` PCI device function not being enumerated [Was: PCMCIA not working on Panasonic Toughbook CF-29] Dominik Brodowski
2019-10-21 16:09           ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2019-10-21 18:17             ` Michael .
2019-10-21 18:47               ` Dominik Brodowski
2019-10-21 18:59                 ` Michael .
2019-10-24 23:22                   ` Michael .
2019-10-25  2:38                     ` Michael .
2019-10-25  7:55                       ` Dominik Brodowski
2019-10-25 18:34                         ` Michael .
2019-10-29  8:58                           ` Michael .
2019-10-29 17:02                             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-02-22 16:56                               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-02-22 18:14                                 ` Michael .
2020-02-25 15:03                                 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-02-25 19:15                                   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-02-25 23:46                                   ` bluerocksaddles
2020-02-26  1:13                                   ` Arvind Sankar
2020-02-26  1:50                                     ` Michael .
2020-02-26  3:12                                       ` Trevor Jacobs
2020-02-26  4:51                                         ` Arvind Sankar
2020-02-26  5:20                                           ` Philip Langdale
2020-02-26  6:10                                             ` Michael .
2020-02-26 19:46                                               ` bluerocksaddles
2020-07-28  1:50                                                 ` Michael .
2020-08-02  5:58                                                   ` Michael .

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191021160952.GA229204@google.com \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=bluerocksaddles@willitsonline.com \
    --cc=keltoiboy@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
    --cc=moklym@gmail.com \
    --cc=trevor_jacobs@aol.com \
    --cc=tridentperfusion@yahoo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).