From: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
To: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] powerpc/prom_init: Use -ffreestanding to avoid a reference to bcmp
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 22:15:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191022051529.GA44041@ubuntu-m2-xlarge-x86> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191018200210.GR28442@gate.crashing.org>
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 03:02:10PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 12:00:22PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > Just as an FYI, there was some more discussion around the availablity
> > and use of bcmp in this LLVM bug which spawned
> > commit 5f074f3e192f ("lib/string.c: implement a basic bcmp").
> >
> > https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41035#c13
> >
> > I believe this is the proper solution but I am fine with whatever works,
> > I just want our CI to be green without any out of tree patches again...
>
> I think the proper solution is for the kernel to *do* use -ffreestanding,
> and then somehow tell the kernel that memcpy etc. are the standard
> functions. A freestanding GCC already requires memcpy, memmove, memset,
> memcmp, and sometimes abort to exist and do the standard thing; why cannot
> programs then also rely on it to be the standard functions.
>
> What exact functions are the reason the kernel does not use -ffreestanding?
> Is it just memcpy? Is more wanted?
>
>
> Segher
I think Linus summarized it pretty well here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wi-epJZfBHDbKKDZ64us7WkF=LpUfhvYBmZSteO8Q0RAg@mail.gmail.com/
Cheers,
Nathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-22 5:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-11 18:20 [PATCH v3 0/3] LLVM/Clang fixes for pseries_defconfig Nathan Chancellor
2019-09-11 18:20 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] powerpc: Don't add -mabi= flags when building with Clang Nathan Chancellor
2019-09-11 18:20 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] powerpc: Avoid clang warnings around setjmp and longjmp Nathan Chancellor
2019-09-11 20:55 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-09-11 18:20 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] powerpc/prom_init: Use -ffreestanding to avoid a reference to bcmp Nathan Chancellor
2019-09-11 21:01 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-09-12 5:43 ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-09-12 17:30 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-10-14 2:50 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] LLVM/Clang fixes for pseries_defconfig Nathan Chancellor
2019-10-14 2:50 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] powerpc: Don't add -mabi= flags when building with Clang Nathan Chancellor
2019-10-14 2:51 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] powerpc: Avoid clang warnings around setjmp and longjmp Nathan Chancellor
2019-10-14 2:51 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] powerpc/prom_init: Use -ffreestanding to avoid a reference to bcmp Nathan Chancellor
2019-10-14 9:35 ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-10-14 15:56 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-10-14 19:11 ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-10-18 19:00 ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-10-18 20:02 ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-10-22 5:15 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2019-10-22 8:57 ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-10-30 4:12 ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-10-14 16:03 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] LLVM/Clang fixes for pseries_defconfig Nick Desaulniers
2019-11-19 4:57 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] LLVM/Clang fixes for a few defconfigs Nathan Chancellor
2019-11-19 4:57 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] powerpc: Don't add -mabi= flags when building with Clang Nathan Chancellor
2019-11-26 1:13 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-11-19 4:57 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] powerpc: Avoid clang warnings around setjmp and longjmp Nathan Chancellor
2019-11-19 4:57 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] powerpc/prom_init: Use -ffreestanding to avoid a reference to bcmp Nathan Chancellor
2019-11-25 20:15 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] LLVM/Clang fixes for a few defconfigs Nick Desaulniers
2019-11-28 4:59 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-11-28 7:45 ` Nathan Chancellor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191022051529.GA44041@ubuntu-m2-xlarge-x86 \
--to=natechancellor@gmail.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).