From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 402CFCA9ECE for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 09:48:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D01B208E3 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 09:48:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1572515330; bh=pQ2TZ8AZGjE832CFWtP12FmqR4rocBUFpuSdy3IhJps=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=o2KJlpwu8ocGzAEkI/lYeVrElwQtwmYxbeWy0Hguv5+Vfm4ebil0GAeySsZ7ugbg3 LtJVq5igNs4FDTBRSmUqNqlbGVV6dIYUp2nBqwSnKxujPwRm0Sm4LafYxqqrpId4Db Gq3XlrZpZ+hmSVS/m+sWUMA4B7Y6MNwTJnv3HYFU= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727177AbfJaJst (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Oct 2019 05:48:49 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:44868 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726867AbfJaJss (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Oct 2019 05:48:48 -0400 Received: from localhost (lns-bzn-32-82-254-4-138.adsl.proxad.net [82.254.4.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A4EDD2086D; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 09:48:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1572515328; bh=pQ2TZ8AZGjE832CFWtP12FmqR4rocBUFpuSdy3IhJps=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ecnwFU71ceqdrL0AkjJR5tVBlshMAAl40bFLHlhvuyeRilCtOSdIqM3aUH9rIYomt uqFUHzTJvOCzAUGfbJ5UJsB7+hWo0abFBvUSVWS2cfwZF0MxNWWQkothYzO2b6ulSn Ag1eINk53eyrnibM0eL5ntAKipomJK0pgdMDeTI8= Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 10:48:37 +0100 From: Maxime Ripard To: Corentin Labbe Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, wens@csie.org, jernej.skrabec@siol.net, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] ARM64: dts: sun50i-h6-pine-h64: state that the DT supports the modelB Message-ID: <20191031094837.wy4gj6xo4youao75@hendrix> References: <1572438255-26107-1-git-send-email-clabbe@baylibre.com> <1572438255-26107-2-git-send-email-clabbe@baylibre.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1572438255-26107-2-git-send-email-clabbe@baylibre.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 12:24:13PM +0000, Corentin Labbe wrote: > The current sun50i-h6-pine-h64 DT does not specify which model (A or B) > it supports. > When this file was created, only modelA was existing, but now both model > exists and with the time, this DT drifted to support the model B since it is > the most common one. > Furtheremore, some part of the model A does not work with it like ethernet and > HDMI connector (as confirmed by Jernej on IRC). > > So it is time to settle the issue, and the easiest way is to state that > this DT is for model B. No, this DT was introduced for model A, and we have to keep that. If some model B changes crept in, that's unfortunate, but it should be reverted, instead of changing the assumptions like this. Maxime