From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@amd.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
"Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, David Windsor <dwindsor@gmail.com>,
Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@intel.com>,
Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com>,
Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com>,
Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
"Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org>,
rcu@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 11/11] x86,rcu: use percpu rcu_preempt_depth
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 10:08:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191031100806.1326-12-laijs@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191031100806.1326-1-laijs@linux.alibaba.com>
Convert x86 to use a per-cpu rcu_preempt_depth. The reason for doing so
is that accessing per-cpu variables is a lot cheaper than accessing
task_struct variables.
We need to save/restore the actual rcu_preempt_depth when switch.
We also place the per-cpu rcu_preempt_depth close to __preempt_count
and current_task variable.
Using the idea of per-cpu __preempt_count.
No function call when using rcu_read_[un]lock().
Single instruction for rcu_read_lock().
2 instructions for fast path of rcu_read_unlock().
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>
---
arch/x86/Kconfig | 2 +
arch/x86/include/asm/rcu_preempt_depth.h | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 7 ++
arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c | 2 +
arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 2 +
include/linux/rcupdate.h | 24 +++++++
init/init_task.c | 2 +-
kernel/fork.c | 2 +-
kernel/rcu/Kconfig | 3 +
kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h | 2 +
kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 39 ++++++++---
11 files changed, 160 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/rcu_preempt_depth.h
diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index d6e1faa28c58..af9fedc0fdc4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ config X86_32
select MODULES_USE_ELF_REL
select OLD_SIGACTION
select GENERIC_VDSO_32
+ select ARCH_HAVE_RCU_PREEMPT_DEEPTH
config X86_64
def_bool y
@@ -31,6 +32,7 @@ config X86_64
select NEED_DMA_MAP_STATE
select SWIOTLB
select ARCH_HAS_SYSCALL_WRAPPER
+ select ARCH_HAVE_RCU_PREEMPT_DEEPTH
config FORCE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE
def_bool y
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/rcu_preempt_depth.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/rcu_preempt_depth.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..88010ad59c20
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/rcu_preempt_depth.h
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+#ifndef __ASM_RCU_PREEMPT_DEPTH_H
+#define __ASM_RCU_PREEMPT_DEPTH_H
+
+#include <asm/rmwcc.h>
+#include <asm/percpu.h>
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
+DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, __rcu_preempt_depth);
+
+/*
+ * We use the RCU_NEED_SPECIAL bit as an inverted need_special
+ * such that a decrement hitting 0 means we can and should do
+ * rcu_read_unlock_special().
+ */
+#define RCU_NEED_SPECIAL 0x80000000
+
+#define INIT_RCU_PREEMPT_DEPTH (RCU_NEED_SPECIAL)
+
+/* We mask the RCU_NEED_SPECIAL bit so that it return real depth */
+static __always_inline int rcu_preempt_depth(void)
+{
+ return raw_cpu_read_4(__rcu_preempt_depth) & ~RCU_NEED_SPECIAL;
+}
+
+static __always_inline void rcu_preempt_depth_set(int pc)
+{
+ int old, new;
+
+ do {
+ old = raw_cpu_read_4(__rcu_preempt_depth);
+ new = (old & RCU_NEED_SPECIAL) |
+ (pc & ~RCU_NEED_SPECIAL);
+ } while (raw_cpu_cmpxchg_4(__rcu_preempt_depth, old, new) != old);
+}
+
+/*
+ * We fold the RCU_NEED_SPECIAL bit into the rcu_preempt_depth such that
+ * rcu_read_unlock() can decrement and test for needing to do special
+ * with a single instruction.
+ *
+ * We invert the actual bit, so that when the decrement hits 0 we know
+ * both it just exited the outmost rcu_read_lock() critical section and
+ * we need to do specail (the bit is cleared) if it doesn't need to be
+ * deferred.
+ */
+
+static inline void set_rcu_preempt_need_special(void)
+{
+ raw_cpu_and_4(__rcu_preempt_depth, ~RCU_NEED_SPECIAL);
+}
+
+/*
+ * irq needs to be disabled for clearing any bits of ->rcu_read_unlock_special
+ * and calling this function. Otherwise it may clear the work done
+ * by set_rcu_preempt_need_special() in interrupt.
+ */
+static inline void clear_rcu_preempt_need_special(void)
+{
+ raw_cpu_or_4(__rcu_preempt_depth, RCU_NEED_SPECIAL);
+}
+
+static __always_inline void rcu_preempt_depth_inc(void)
+{
+ raw_cpu_add_4(__rcu_preempt_depth, 1);
+}
+
+static __always_inline bool rcu_preempt_depth_dec_and_test(void)
+{
+ return GEN_UNARY_RMWcc("decl", __rcu_preempt_depth, e, __percpu_arg([var]));
+}
+
+/* must be macros to avoid header recursion hell */
+#define save_restore_rcu_preempt_depth(prev_p, next_p) do { \
+ prev_p->rcu_read_lock_nesting = this_cpu_read(__rcu_preempt_depth); \
+ this_cpu_write(__rcu_preempt_depth, next_p->rcu_read_lock_nesting); \
+ } while (0)
+
+#define DEFINE_PERCPU_RCU_PREEMP_DEPTH \
+ DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, __rcu_preempt_depth) = INIT_RCU_PREEMPT_DEPTH; \
+ EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(__rcu_preempt_depth)
+#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU */
+#define save_restore_rcu_preempt_depth(prev_p, next_p) do {} while (0)
+#define DEFINE_PERCPU_RCU_PREEMP_DEPTH /* empty */
+#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU */
+
+#endif /* __ASM_RCU_PREEMPT_DEPTH_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
index 9ae7d1bcd4f4..0151737e196c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@
#include <asm/asm.h>
#include <asm/bugs.h>
#include <asm/cpu.h>
+#include <asm/rcu_preempt_depth.h>
#include <asm/mce.h>
#include <asm/msr.h>
#include <asm/pat.h>
@@ -1633,6 +1634,9 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, irq_count) __visible = -1;
DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, __preempt_count) = INIT_PREEMPT_COUNT;
EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(__preempt_count);
+/* close to __preempt_count */
+DEFINE_PERCPU_RCU_PREEMP_DEPTH;
+
/* May not be marked __init: used by software suspend */
void syscall_init(void)
{
@@ -1690,6 +1694,9 @@ EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(current_task);
DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, __preempt_count) = INIT_PREEMPT_COUNT;
EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(__preempt_count);
+/* close to __preempt_count */
+DEFINE_PERCPU_RCU_PREEMP_DEPTH;
+
/*
* On x86_32, vm86 modifies tss.sp0, so sp0 isn't a reliable way to find
* the top of the kernel stack. Use an extra percpu variable to track the
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
index b8ceec4974fe..ab1f20353663 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@
#include <asm/cpu.h>
#include <asm/syscalls.h>
#include <asm/debugreg.h>
+#include <asm/rcu_preempt_depth.h>
#include <asm/switch_to.h>
#include <asm/vm86.h>
#include <asm/resctrl_sched.h>
@@ -290,6 +291,7 @@ __switch_to(struct task_struct *prev_p, struct task_struct *next_p)
if (prev->gs | next->gs)
lazy_load_gs(next->gs);
+ save_restore_rcu_preempt_depth(prev_p, next_p);
this_cpu_write(current_task, next_p);
switch_fpu_finish(next_fpu);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
index af64519b2695..2e1c6e829d30 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@
#include <asm/ia32.h>
#include <asm/syscalls.h>
#include <asm/debugreg.h>
+#include <asm/rcu_preempt_depth.h>
#include <asm/switch_to.h>
#include <asm/xen/hypervisor.h>
#include <asm/vdso.h>
@@ -559,6 +560,7 @@ __switch_to(struct task_struct *prev_p, struct task_struct *next_p)
x86_fsgsbase_load(prev, next);
+ save_restore_rcu_preempt_depth(prev_p, next_p);
/*
* Switch the PDA and FPU contexts.
*/
diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index a35daab95d14..0d2abf08b694 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -41,6 +41,29 @@ void synchronize_rcu(void);
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAVE_RCU_PREEMPT_DEEPTH
+#include <asm/rcu_preempt_depth.h>
+
+#ifndef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
+extern void rcu_read_unlock_special(void);
+
+static inline void __rcu_read_lock(void)
+{
+ rcu_preempt_depth_inc();
+}
+
+static inline void __rcu_read_unlock(void)
+{
+ if (unlikely(rcu_preempt_depth_dec_and_test()))
+ rcu_read_unlock_special();
+}
+#else
+void __rcu_read_lock(void);
+void __rcu_read_unlock(void);
+#endif
+
+#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAVE_RCU_PREEMPT_DEEPTH */
+#define INIT_RCU_PREEMPT_DEPTH (0)
void __rcu_read_lock(void);
void __rcu_read_unlock(void);
@@ -51,6 +74,7 @@ void __rcu_read_unlock(void);
* types of kernel builds, the rcu_read_lock() nesting depth is unknowable.
*/
#define rcu_preempt_depth() (current->rcu_read_lock_nesting)
+#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAVE_RCU_PREEMPT_DEEPTH */
#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU */
diff --git a/init/init_task.c b/init/init_task.c
index 9e5cbe5eab7b..0a91e38fba37 100644
--- a/init/init_task.c
+++ b/init/init_task.c
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ struct task_struct init_task
.perf_event_list = LIST_HEAD_INIT(init_task.perf_event_list),
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
- .rcu_read_lock_nesting = 0,
+ .rcu_read_lock_nesting = INIT_RCU_PREEMPT_DEPTH,
.rcu_read_unlock_special.s = 0,
.rcu_node_entry = LIST_HEAD_INIT(init_task.rcu_node_entry),
.rcu_blocked_node = NULL,
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index f9572f416126..7368d4ccb857 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1665,7 +1665,7 @@ init_task_pid(struct task_struct *task, enum pid_type type, struct pid *pid)
static inline void rcu_copy_process(struct task_struct *p)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
- p->rcu_read_lock_nesting = 0;
+ p->rcu_read_lock_nesting = INIT_RCU_PREEMPT_DEPTH;
p->rcu_read_unlock_special.s = 0;
p->rcu_blocked_node = NULL;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->rcu_node_entry);
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/Kconfig b/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
index 1cc940fef17c..d2ecca49a1a4 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
+++ b/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
@@ -14,6 +14,9 @@ config TREE_RCU
thousands of CPUs. It also scales down nicely to
smaller systems.
+config ARCH_HAVE_RCU_PREEMPT_DEEPTH
+ def_bool n
+
config PREEMPT_RCU
bool
default y if PREEMPTION
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
index dc1af2073e25..b8922cb19884 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
@@ -588,6 +588,7 @@ static void wait_rcu_exp_gp(struct work_struct *wp)
}
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
+static inline void set_rcu_preempt_need_special(void);
/*
* Remote handler for smp_call_function_single(). If there is an
@@ -644,6 +645,7 @@ static void rcu_exp_handler(void *unused)
if (rcu_preempt_depth() > 0) {
rdp->exp_deferred_qs = true;
WRITE_ONCE(t->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.exp_hint, true);
+ set_rcu_preempt_need_special();
return;
}
}
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index 21bb04fec0d2..4d958d4b179c 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ static void __init rcu_bootup_announce_oddness(void)
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
static void rcu_report_exp_rnp(struct rcu_node *rnp, bool wake);
-static void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t);
+void rcu_read_unlock_special(void);
/*
* Tell them what RCU they are running.
@@ -298,6 +298,7 @@ void rcu_note_context_switch(bool preempt)
t->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.need_qs = false;
t->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.blocked = true;
t->rcu_blocked_node = rnp;
+ set_rcu_preempt_need_special();
/*
* Verify the CPU's sanity, trace the preemption, and
@@ -345,6 +346,7 @@ static int rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp(struct rcu_node *rnp)
/* Bias and limit values for ->rcu_read_lock_nesting. */
#define RCU_NEST_PMAX (INT_MAX / 2)
+#ifndef CONFIG_ARCH_HAVE_RCU_PREEMPT_DEEPTH
static inline void rcu_preempt_depth_inc(void)
{
current->rcu_read_lock_nesting++;
@@ -352,7 +354,12 @@ static inline void rcu_preempt_depth_inc(void)
static inline bool rcu_preempt_depth_dec_and_test(void)
{
- return --current->rcu_read_lock_nesting == 0;
+ if (--current->rcu_read_lock_nesting == 0) {
+ /* check speical after dec ->rcu_read_lock_nesting */
+ barrier();
+ return READ_ONCE(current->rcu_read_unlock_special.s);
+ }
+ return 0;
}
static inline void rcu_preempt_depth_set(int val)
@@ -360,6 +367,12 @@ static inline void rcu_preempt_depth_set(int val)
current->rcu_read_lock_nesting = val;
}
+static inline void clear_rcu_preempt_need_special(void) {}
+static inline void set_rcu_preempt_need_special(void) {}
+
+#endif /* #ifndef CONFIG_ARCH_HAVE_RCU_PREEMPT_DEEPTH */
+
+#if !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_HAVE_RCU_PREEMPT_DEEPTH) || defined (CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING)
/*
* Preemptible RCU implementation for rcu_read_lock().
* Just increment ->rcu_read_lock_nesting, shared state will be updated
@@ -383,18 +396,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__rcu_read_lock);
*/
void __rcu_read_unlock(void)
{
- struct task_struct *t = current;
-
if (rcu_preempt_depth_dec_and_test()) {
- barrier(); /* critical section before exit code. */
- if (unlikely(READ_ONCE(t->rcu_read_unlock_special.s)))
- rcu_read_unlock_special(t);
+ rcu_read_unlock_special();
}
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING)) {
- WARN_ON_ONCE(rcu_preempt_depth() < 0);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(rcu_preempt_depth() < 0 ||
+ rcu_preempt_depth() > RCU_NEST_PMAX);
}
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__rcu_read_unlock);
+#endif /* #if !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_HAVE_RCU_PREEMPT_DEEPTH) || defined (CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING) */
/*
* Advance a ->blkd_tasks-list pointer to the next entry, instead
@@ -445,6 +456,7 @@ rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_irqrestore(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long flags)
*/
special = t->rcu_read_unlock_special;
t->rcu_read_unlock_special.s = 0;
+ clear_rcu_preempt_need_special();
if (special.b.need_qs) {
rcu_qs();
}
@@ -577,8 +589,9 @@ static void rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_handler(struct irq_work *iwp)
* notify RCU core processing or task having blocked during the RCU
* read-side critical section.
*/
-static void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t)
+void rcu_read_unlock_special(void)
{
+ struct task_struct *t = current;
unsigned long flags;
bool preempt_bh_were_disabled =
!!(preempt_count() & (PREEMPT_MASK | SOFTIRQ_MASK));
@@ -610,6 +623,8 @@ static void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t)
// call rcu_read_unlock_special() and then wake_up()
// recursively and deadlock if deferred_qs is still false.
// To avoid it, deferred_qs has to be set beforehand.
+ // rcu_preempt_need_special is already set, so it doesn't
+ // need to call set_rcu_preempt_need_special()
t->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.deferred_qs = true;
if (irqs_were_disabled && use_softirq &&
(in_interrupt() || (exp && !deferred_qs))) {
@@ -636,6 +651,7 @@ static void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t)
}
rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_irqrestore(t, flags);
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_read_unlock_special);
/*
* Check that the list of blocked tasks for the newly completed grace
@@ -699,8 +715,10 @@ static void rcu_flavor_sched_clock_irq(int user)
__this_cpu_read(rcu_data.core_needs_qs) &&
__this_cpu_read(rcu_data.cpu_no_qs.b.norm) &&
!t->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.need_qs &&
- time_after(jiffies, rcu_state.gp_start + HZ))
+ time_after(jiffies, rcu_state.gp_start + HZ)) {
t->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.need_qs = true;
+ set_rcu_preempt_need_special();
+ }
}
/*
@@ -719,6 +737,7 @@ void exit_rcu(void)
rcu_preempt_depth_set(1);
barrier();
WRITE_ONCE(t->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.blocked, true);
+ set_rcu_preempt_need_special();
} else if (unlikely(rcu_preempt_depth())) {
rcu_preempt_depth_set(1);
} else {
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-31 10:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-31 10:07 [PATCH 00/11] rcu: introduce percpu rcu_preempt_depth Lai Jiangshan
2019-10-31 10:07 ` [PATCH 01/11] rcu: avoid leaking exp_deferred_qs into next GP Lai Jiangshan
2019-10-31 13:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-10-31 18:19 ` Lai Jiangshan
2019-10-31 19:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-10-31 10:07 ` [PATCH 02/11] rcu: fix bug when rcu_exp_handler() in nested interrupt Lai Jiangshan
2019-10-31 13:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-10-31 14:20 ` Lai Jiangshan
2019-10-31 14:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-10-31 15:14 ` Lai Jiangshan
2019-10-31 18:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-11-01 0:19 ` Boqun Feng
2019-11-01 2:29 ` Lai Jiangshan
2019-10-31 10:07 ` [PATCH 03/11] rcu: clean up rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_irqrestore() Lai Jiangshan
2019-10-31 13:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-10-31 15:25 ` Lai Jiangshan
2019-10-31 18:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-10-31 19:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-10-31 10:07 ` [PATCH 04/11] rcu: cleanup rcu_preempt_deferred_qs() Lai Jiangshan
2019-10-31 14:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-10-31 14:35 ` Lai Jiangshan
2019-10-31 15:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-10-31 18:33 ` Lai Jiangshan
2019-10-31 22:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-10-31 10:08 ` [PATCH 05/11] rcu: clean all rcu_read_unlock_special after report qs Lai Jiangshan
2019-11-01 11:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-10-31 10:08 ` [PATCH 06/11] rcu: clear t->rcu_read_unlock_special in one go Lai Jiangshan
2019-11-01 12:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-11-01 16:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-10-31 10:08 ` [PATCH 07/11] rcu: set special.b.deferred_qs before wake_up() Lai Jiangshan
2019-10-31 10:08 ` [PATCH 08/11] rcu: don't use negative ->rcu_read_lock_nesting Lai Jiangshan
2019-11-01 12:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-11-16 13:04 ` Lai Jiangshan
2019-11-17 21:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-11-18 1:54 ` Lai Jiangshan
2019-11-18 14:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-10-31 10:08 ` [PATCH 09/11] rcu: wrap usages of rcu_read_lock_nesting Lai Jiangshan
2019-10-31 10:08 ` [PATCH 10/11] rcu: clear the special.b.need_qs in rcu_note_context_switch() Lai Jiangshan
2019-10-31 10:08 ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]
2019-11-01 12:58 ` [PATCH 11/11] x86,rcu: use percpu rcu_preempt_depth Paul E. McKenney
2019-11-01 13:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-01 14:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-11-01 15:32 ` Lai Jiangshan
2019-11-01 16:21 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-11-01 15:47 ` Lai Jiangshan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191031100806.1326-12-laijs@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=laijs@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=Babu.Moger@amd.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
--cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=duyuyang@gmail.com \
--cc=dwindsor@gmail.com \
--cc=elena.reshetova@intel.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=ldv@altlinux.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rgb@redhat.com \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).