From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9A96CA9ECF for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 08:45:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29E5D21A49 for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 08:45:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="mkjDY3Wh" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726830AbfKAIpc (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Nov 2019 04:45:32 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:45374 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726229AbfKAIpb (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Nov 2019 04:45:31 -0400 Received: from nazgul.tnic (unknown [91.217.168.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 8E2D41EC0CA8; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 09:45:30 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1572597930; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=dFXWAvVz9OvBiNSTnvWDc55qoGn1dAsOZM95FhLHQmA=; b=mkjDY3WhmTAM5bp8CJKQZjAWOixno6HsKPMdUs5HKJerNjrZJZvLhmMssoBJnhsdUKQAn9 Ez/VUiT+E1z+RY3QfsSAaztfi9q8DWSfkYTcfo/4/36FX75xOGa/0J2ZRKC2uDB5r+u3Nm FFNny6YfRgYeOKp+HQn4tb0DzV5iyqo= Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2019 09:45:24 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: zhong jiang Cc: peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/ioremap: Use WARN_ONCE instead of printk() + WARN_ON_ONCE() Message-ID: <20191101084524.GA29724@nazgul.tnic> References: <1572425838-39158-1-git-send-email-zhongjiang@huawei.com> <20191031110304.GE21133@nazgul.tnic> <5DBACB61.90809@huawei.com> <20191031154916.GA24152@nazgul.tnic> <5DBB03B0.5060003@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5DBB03B0.5060003@huawei.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 11:54:24PM +0800, zhong jiang wrote: > Yep, WARN_ONCE alway return true in that case. Are you sure it does that always? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply. --