From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABC4BCA9ECF for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 10:08:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8864D217F9 for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 10:08:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729572AbfKAKI5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Nov 2019 06:08:57 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:46216 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728048AbfKAKI4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Nov 2019 06:08:56 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08099B4CD; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 10:08:55 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2019 11:08:50 +0100 From: Michal =?iso-8859-1?Q?Koutn=FD?= To: Valentin Schneider Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, lizefan@huawei.com, tj@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com, morten.rasmussen@arm.com, qperret@google.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] sched/topology: Don't try to build empty sched domains Message-ID: <20191101100850.GA16165@blackbody.suse.cz> References: <20191023153745.19515-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com> <20191023153745.19515-2-valentin.schneider@arm.com> <20191031162334.GA18570@blackbody.suse.cz> <3752bca9-a670-f415-4aaa-e8ff75ea6fcc@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3752bca9-a670-f415-4aaa-e8ff75ea6fcc@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 06:23:12PM +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote: > Do you reckon the following would work?=20 LGTM (i.e. cpuset will be skipped if no CPUs taking part in load balancing remain in it after hot(un)plug event). Michal --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEEoQaUCWq8F2Id1tNia1+riC5qSgFAl28BC0ACgkQia1+riC5 qShiWQ//coKu7sUzL9S712rBkjJuuZTbEgiG4vayWNJkI6CiV4/kPvqoRqqHW6jx tqjaJc8WnvcGPzviRbO2MxxSolez/lV3YBsEG7yxAWEOqEl8KLTAiYXk//muLupK e95/iLA/abTMER+gTOLi4qqMsKBtnH433QTCP/c9jzxaQjlXlo/T5D9s0lDD0bEN +/wkfUdHyQyOB2+LZpufCjaPdQSKkjsa1o29J48VV5lBaIb86rX1AWmcz5woCULP R4b3sO2lvcUwalH/ri6n7soF8Vm/IivPawNqSwVbK84te6SKzqSfnHO75gCalCWW 6W+kilNsX2A9pDPj3omTvC4LzCNkeeXW7UQyOYmEOikDhj5aVAUcJDeeuCPiUXMW /WeQD6dT8adPMBAJEnN/GwsPW2QLAy5jXtbVJBonOD6syF7oSGLONMVl8LDMA2Es PHpyRCKcvZGPmpjXA65ooE9ZV52732RHlGGqxnsgN6iXns6XRxD7H9M37NIIc+FK 8c61qsrcMVZEtxBehdchoXe6vcvdmS8Ic4o8auQWzVJjoa1BYNJcWo7YYnMsdMW4 cBbg9JlUeuIiCg8I016NtBUOwkRa656L/3OtroXD5Xqbq2/T9k0UVbVM2r16wLMD xDouMZUIBFUaPspkEqS1PQwgXGt8D/7dNtFP4iiVNHMDhhc1xO4= =bZv+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO--