linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@amd.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
	"Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>,
	Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, David Windsor <dwindsor@gmail.com>,
	Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@intel.com>,
	Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com>,
	Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com>,
	Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	"Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org>,
	rcu@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] x86,rcu: use percpu rcu_preempt_depth
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2019 05:58:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191101125816.GD17910@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191031100806.1326-12-laijs@linux.alibaba.com>

On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 10:08:06AM +0000, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> Convert x86 to use a per-cpu rcu_preempt_depth. The reason for doing so
> is that accessing per-cpu variables is a lot cheaper than accessing
> task_struct variables.
> 
> We need to save/restore the actual rcu_preempt_depth when switch.
> We also place the per-cpu rcu_preempt_depth close to __preempt_count
> and current_task variable.
> 
> Using the idea of per-cpu __preempt_count.
> 
> No function call when using rcu_read_[un]lock().
> Single instruction for rcu_read_lock().
> 2 instructions for fast path of rcu_read_unlock().
> 
> CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/Kconfig                         |  2 +
>  arch/x86/include/asm/rcu_preempt_depth.h | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c             |  7 ++
>  arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c             |  2 +
>  arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c             |  2 +
>  include/linux/rcupdate.h                 | 24 +++++++
>  init/init_task.c                         |  2 +-
>  kernel/fork.c                            |  2 +-
>  kernel/rcu/Kconfig                       |  3 +
>  kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h                    |  2 +
>  kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h                 | 39 ++++++++---
>  11 files changed, 160 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/rcu_preempt_depth.h
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index d6e1faa28c58..af9fedc0fdc4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ config X86_32
>  	select MODULES_USE_ELF_REL
>  	select OLD_SIGACTION
>  	select GENERIC_VDSO_32
> +	select ARCH_HAVE_RCU_PREEMPT_DEEPTH
>  
>  config X86_64
>  	def_bool y
> @@ -31,6 +32,7 @@ config X86_64
>  	select NEED_DMA_MAP_STATE
>  	select SWIOTLB
>  	select ARCH_HAS_SYSCALL_WRAPPER
> +	select ARCH_HAVE_RCU_PREEMPT_DEEPTH
>  
>  config FORCE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE
>  	def_bool y
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/rcu_preempt_depth.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/rcu_preempt_depth.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..88010ad59c20
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/rcu_preempt_depth.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +#ifndef __ASM_RCU_PREEMPT_DEPTH_H
> +#define __ASM_RCU_PREEMPT_DEPTH_H
> +
> +#include <asm/rmwcc.h>
> +#include <asm/percpu.h>
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
> +DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, __rcu_preempt_depth);
> +
> +/*
> + * We use the RCU_NEED_SPECIAL bit as an inverted need_special
> + * such that a decrement hitting 0 means we can and should do
> + * rcu_read_unlock_special().
> + */
> +#define RCU_NEED_SPECIAL	0x80000000
> +
> +#define INIT_RCU_PREEMPT_DEPTH	(RCU_NEED_SPECIAL)
> +
> +/* We mask the RCU_NEED_SPECIAL bit so that it return real depth */
> +static __always_inline int rcu_preempt_depth(void)
> +{
> +	return raw_cpu_read_4(__rcu_preempt_depth) & ~RCU_NEED_SPECIAL;

Why not raw_cpu_generic_read()?

OK, OK, I get that raw_cpu_read_4() translates directly into an "mov"
instruction on x86, but given that x86 percpu_from_op() is able to
adjust based on operand size, why doesn't something like raw_cpu_read()
also have an x86-specific definition that adjusts based on operand size?

> +}
> +
> +static __always_inline void rcu_preempt_depth_set(int pc)
> +{
> +	int old, new;
> +
> +	do {
> +		old = raw_cpu_read_4(__rcu_preempt_depth);
> +		new = (old & RCU_NEED_SPECIAL) |
> +			(pc & ~RCU_NEED_SPECIAL);
> +	} while (raw_cpu_cmpxchg_4(__rcu_preempt_depth, old, new) != old);

Ummm...

OK, as you know, I have long wanted _rcu_read_lock() to be inlineable.
But are you -sure- that an x86 cmpxchg is faster than a function call
and return?  I have strong doubts on that score.

Plus multiplying the x86-specific code by 26 doesn't look good.

And the RCU read-side nesting depth really is a per-task thing.  Copying
it to and from the task at context-switch time might make sense if we
had a serious optimization, but it does not appear that we do.

You original patch some years back, ill-received though it was at the
time, is looking rather good by comparison.  Plus it did not require
architecture-specific code!

							Thanx, Paul

 +}
> +
> +/*
> + * We fold the RCU_NEED_SPECIAL bit into the rcu_preempt_depth such that
> + * rcu_read_unlock() can decrement and test for needing to do special
> + * with a single instruction.
> + *
> + * We invert the actual bit, so that when the decrement hits 0 we know
> + * both it just exited the outmost rcu_read_lock() critical section and
> + * we need to do specail (the bit is cleared) if it doesn't need to be
> + * deferred.
> + */
> +
> +static inline void set_rcu_preempt_need_special(void)
> +{
> +	raw_cpu_and_4(__rcu_preempt_depth, ~RCU_NEED_SPECIAL);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * irq needs to be disabled for clearing any bits of ->rcu_read_unlock_special
> + * and calling this function. Otherwise it may clear the work done
> + * by set_rcu_preempt_need_special() in interrupt.
> + */
> +static inline void clear_rcu_preempt_need_special(void)
> +{
> +	raw_cpu_or_4(__rcu_preempt_depth, RCU_NEED_SPECIAL);
> +}
> +
> +static __always_inline void rcu_preempt_depth_inc(void)
> +{
> +	raw_cpu_add_4(__rcu_preempt_depth, 1);
> +}
> +
> +static __always_inline bool rcu_preempt_depth_dec_and_test(void)
> +{
> +	return GEN_UNARY_RMWcc("decl", __rcu_preempt_depth, e, __percpu_arg([var]));
> +}
> +
> +/* must be macros to avoid header recursion hell */
> +#define save_restore_rcu_preempt_depth(prev_p, next_p) do {				\
> +		prev_p->rcu_read_lock_nesting = this_cpu_read(__rcu_preempt_depth);	\
> +		this_cpu_write(__rcu_preempt_depth, next_p->rcu_read_lock_nesting);	\
> +	} while (0)
> +
> +#define DEFINE_PERCPU_RCU_PREEMP_DEPTH						\
> +	DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, __rcu_preempt_depth) = INIT_RCU_PREEMPT_DEPTH;	\
> +	EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(__rcu_preempt_depth)
> +#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU */
> +#define save_restore_rcu_preempt_depth(prev_p, next_p) do {} while (0)
> +#define DEFINE_PERCPU_RCU_PREEMP_DEPTH	/* empty */
> +#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU */
> +
> +#endif /* __ASM_RCU_PREEMPT_DEPTH_H */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> index 9ae7d1bcd4f4..0151737e196c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@
>  #include <asm/asm.h>
>  #include <asm/bugs.h>
>  #include <asm/cpu.h>
> +#include <asm/rcu_preempt_depth.h>
>  #include <asm/mce.h>
>  #include <asm/msr.h>
>  #include <asm/pat.h>
> @@ -1633,6 +1634,9 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, irq_count) __visible = -1;
>  DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, __preempt_count) = INIT_PREEMPT_COUNT;
>  EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(__preempt_count);
>  
> +/* close to __preempt_count */
> +DEFINE_PERCPU_RCU_PREEMP_DEPTH;
> +
>  /* May not be marked __init: used by software suspend */
>  void syscall_init(void)
>  {
> @@ -1690,6 +1694,9 @@ EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(current_task);
>  DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, __preempt_count) = INIT_PREEMPT_COUNT;
>  EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(__preempt_count);
>  
> +/* close to __preempt_count */
> +DEFINE_PERCPU_RCU_PREEMP_DEPTH;
> +
>  /*
>   * On x86_32, vm86 modifies tss.sp0, so sp0 isn't a reliable way to find
>   * the top of the kernel stack.  Use an extra percpu variable to track the
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
> index b8ceec4974fe..ab1f20353663 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
> @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@
>  #include <asm/cpu.h>
>  #include <asm/syscalls.h>
>  #include <asm/debugreg.h>
> +#include <asm/rcu_preempt_depth.h>
>  #include <asm/switch_to.h>
>  #include <asm/vm86.h>
>  #include <asm/resctrl_sched.h>
> @@ -290,6 +291,7 @@ __switch_to(struct task_struct *prev_p, struct task_struct *next_p)
>  	if (prev->gs | next->gs)
>  		lazy_load_gs(next->gs);
>  
> +	save_restore_rcu_preempt_depth(prev_p, next_p);
>  	this_cpu_write(current_task, next_p);
>  
>  	switch_fpu_finish(next_fpu);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
> index af64519b2695..2e1c6e829d30 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
> @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@
>  #include <asm/ia32.h>
>  #include <asm/syscalls.h>
>  #include <asm/debugreg.h>
> +#include <asm/rcu_preempt_depth.h>
>  #include <asm/switch_to.h>
>  #include <asm/xen/hypervisor.h>
>  #include <asm/vdso.h>
> @@ -559,6 +560,7 @@ __switch_to(struct task_struct *prev_p, struct task_struct *next_p)
>  
>  	x86_fsgsbase_load(prev, next);
>  
> +	save_restore_rcu_preempt_depth(prev_p, next_p);
>  	/*
>  	 * Switch the PDA and FPU contexts.
>  	 */
> diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> index a35daab95d14..0d2abf08b694 100644
> --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> @@ -41,6 +41,29 @@ void synchronize_rcu(void);
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAVE_RCU_PREEMPT_DEEPTH
> +#include <asm/rcu_preempt_depth.h>
> +
> +#ifndef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
> +extern void rcu_read_unlock_special(void);
> +
> +static inline void __rcu_read_lock(void)
> +{
> +	rcu_preempt_depth_inc();
> +}
> +
> +static inline void __rcu_read_unlock(void)
> +{
> +	if (unlikely(rcu_preempt_depth_dec_and_test()))
> +		rcu_read_unlock_special();
> +}
> +#else
> +void __rcu_read_lock(void);
> +void __rcu_read_unlock(void);
> +#endif
> +
> +#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAVE_RCU_PREEMPT_DEEPTH */
> +#define INIT_RCU_PREEMPT_DEPTH (0)
>  void __rcu_read_lock(void);
>  void __rcu_read_unlock(void);
>  
> @@ -51,6 +74,7 @@ void __rcu_read_unlock(void);
>   * types of kernel builds, the rcu_read_lock() nesting depth is unknowable.
>   */
>  #define rcu_preempt_depth() (current->rcu_read_lock_nesting)
> +#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAVE_RCU_PREEMPT_DEEPTH */
>  
>  #else /* #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU */
>  
> diff --git a/init/init_task.c b/init/init_task.c
> index 9e5cbe5eab7b..0a91e38fba37 100644
> --- a/init/init_task.c
> +++ b/init/init_task.c
> @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ struct task_struct init_task
>  	.perf_event_list = LIST_HEAD_INIT(init_task.perf_event_list),
>  #endif
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
> -	.rcu_read_lock_nesting = 0,
> +	.rcu_read_lock_nesting = INIT_RCU_PREEMPT_DEPTH,
>  	.rcu_read_unlock_special.s = 0,
>  	.rcu_node_entry = LIST_HEAD_INIT(init_task.rcu_node_entry),
>  	.rcu_blocked_node = NULL,
> diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
> index f9572f416126..7368d4ccb857 100644
> --- a/kernel/fork.c
> +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> @@ -1665,7 +1665,7 @@ init_task_pid(struct task_struct *task, enum pid_type type, struct pid *pid)
>  static inline void rcu_copy_process(struct task_struct *p)
>  {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
> -	p->rcu_read_lock_nesting = 0;
> +	p->rcu_read_lock_nesting = INIT_RCU_PREEMPT_DEPTH;
>  	p->rcu_read_unlock_special.s = 0;
>  	p->rcu_blocked_node = NULL;
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->rcu_node_entry);
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/Kconfig b/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
> index 1cc940fef17c..d2ecca49a1a4 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
> @@ -14,6 +14,9 @@ config TREE_RCU
>  	  thousands of CPUs.  It also scales down nicely to
>  	  smaller systems.
>  
> +config ARCH_HAVE_RCU_PREEMPT_DEEPTH
> +	def_bool n
> +
>  config PREEMPT_RCU
>  	bool
>  	default y if PREEMPTION
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
> index dc1af2073e25..b8922cb19884 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
> @@ -588,6 +588,7 @@ static void wait_rcu_exp_gp(struct work_struct *wp)
>  }
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
> +static inline void set_rcu_preempt_need_special(void);
>  
>  /*
>   * Remote handler for smp_call_function_single().  If there is an
> @@ -644,6 +645,7 @@ static void rcu_exp_handler(void *unused)
>  	if (rcu_preempt_depth() > 0) {
>  		rdp->exp_deferred_qs = true;
>  		WRITE_ONCE(t->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.exp_hint, true);
> +		set_rcu_preempt_need_special();
>  		return;
>  	}
>  }
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> index 21bb04fec0d2..4d958d4b179c 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ static void __init rcu_bootup_announce_oddness(void)
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
>  
>  static void rcu_report_exp_rnp(struct rcu_node *rnp, bool wake);
> -static void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t);
> +void rcu_read_unlock_special(void);
>  
>  /*
>   * Tell them what RCU they are running.
> @@ -298,6 +298,7 @@ void rcu_note_context_switch(bool preempt)
>  		t->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.need_qs = false;
>  		t->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.blocked = true;
>  		t->rcu_blocked_node = rnp;
> +		set_rcu_preempt_need_special();
>  
>  		/*
>  		 * Verify the CPU's sanity, trace the preemption, and
> @@ -345,6 +346,7 @@ static int rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp(struct rcu_node *rnp)
>  /* Bias and limit values for ->rcu_read_lock_nesting. */
>  #define RCU_NEST_PMAX (INT_MAX / 2)
>  
> +#ifndef CONFIG_ARCH_HAVE_RCU_PREEMPT_DEEPTH
>  static inline void rcu_preempt_depth_inc(void)
>  {
>  	current->rcu_read_lock_nesting++;
> @@ -352,7 +354,12 @@ static inline void rcu_preempt_depth_inc(void)
>  
>  static inline bool rcu_preempt_depth_dec_and_test(void)
>  {
> -	return --current->rcu_read_lock_nesting == 0;
> +	if (--current->rcu_read_lock_nesting == 0) {
> +		/* check speical after dec ->rcu_read_lock_nesting */
> +		barrier();
> +		return READ_ONCE(current->rcu_read_unlock_special.s);
> +	}
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static inline void rcu_preempt_depth_set(int val)
> @@ -360,6 +367,12 @@ static inline void rcu_preempt_depth_set(int val)
>  	current->rcu_read_lock_nesting = val;
>  }
>  
> +static inline void clear_rcu_preempt_need_special(void) {}
> +static inline void set_rcu_preempt_need_special(void) {}
> +
> +#endif /* #ifndef CONFIG_ARCH_HAVE_RCU_PREEMPT_DEEPTH */
> +
> +#if !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_HAVE_RCU_PREEMPT_DEEPTH) || defined (CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING)
>  /*
>   * Preemptible RCU implementation for rcu_read_lock().
>   * Just increment ->rcu_read_lock_nesting, shared state will be updated
> @@ -383,18 +396,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__rcu_read_lock);
>   */
>  void __rcu_read_unlock(void)
>  {
> -	struct task_struct *t = current;
> -
>  	if (rcu_preempt_depth_dec_and_test()) {
> -		barrier();  /* critical section before exit code. */
> -		if (unlikely(READ_ONCE(t->rcu_read_unlock_special.s)))
> -			rcu_read_unlock_special(t);
> +		rcu_read_unlock_special();
>  	}
>  	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING)) {
> -		WARN_ON_ONCE(rcu_preempt_depth() < 0);
> +		WARN_ON_ONCE(rcu_preempt_depth() < 0 ||
> +			     rcu_preempt_depth() > RCU_NEST_PMAX);
>  	}
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__rcu_read_unlock);
> +#endif /* #if !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_HAVE_RCU_PREEMPT_DEEPTH) || defined (CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING) */
>  
>  /*
>   * Advance a ->blkd_tasks-list pointer to the next entry, instead
> @@ -445,6 +456,7 @@ rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_irqrestore(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long flags)
>  	 */
>  	special = t->rcu_read_unlock_special;
>  	t->rcu_read_unlock_special.s = 0;
> +	clear_rcu_preempt_need_special();
>  	if (special.b.need_qs) {
>  		rcu_qs();
>  	}
> @@ -577,8 +589,9 @@ static void rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_handler(struct irq_work *iwp)
>   * notify RCU core processing or task having blocked during the RCU
>   * read-side critical section.
>   */
> -static void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t)
> +void rcu_read_unlock_special(void)
>  {
> +	struct task_struct *t = current;
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  	bool preempt_bh_were_disabled =
>  			!!(preempt_count() & (PREEMPT_MASK | SOFTIRQ_MASK));
> @@ -610,6 +623,8 @@ static void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t)
>  		// call rcu_read_unlock_special() and then wake_up()
>  		// recursively and deadlock if deferred_qs is still false.
>  		// To avoid it, deferred_qs has to be set beforehand.
> +		// rcu_preempt_need_special is already set, so it doesn't
> +		// need to call set_rcu_preempt_need_special()
>  		t->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.deferred_qs = true;
>  		if (irqs_were_disabled && use_softirq &&
>  		    (in_interrupt() || (exp && !deferred_qs))) {
> @@ -636,6 +651,7 @@ static void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t)
>  	}
>  	rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_irqrestore(t, flags);
>  }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_read_unlock_special);
>  
>  /*
>   * Check that the list of blocked tasks for the newly completed grace
> @@ -699,8 +715,10 @@ static void rcu_flavor_sched_clock_irq(int user)
>  	    __this_cpu_read(rcu_data.core_needs_qs) &&
>  	    __this_cpu_read(rcu_data.cpu_no_qs.b.norm) &&
>  	    !t->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.need_qs &&
> -	    time_after(jiffies, rcu_state.gp_start + HZ))
> +	    time_after(jiffies, rcu_state.gp_start + HZ)) {
>  		t->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.need_qs = true;
> +		set_rcu_preempt_need_special();
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -719,6 +737,7 @@ void exit_rcu(void)
>  		rcu_preempt_depth_set(1);
>  		barrier();
>  		WRITE_ONCE(t->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.blocked, true);
> +		set_rcu_preempt_need_special();
>  	} else if (unlikely(rcu_preempt_depth())) {
>  		rcu_preempt_depth_set(1);
>  	} else {
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-01 12:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-31 10:07 [PATCH 00/11] rcu: introduce percpu rcu_preempt_depth Lai Jiangshan
2019-10-31 10:07 ` [PATCH 01/11] rcu: avoid leaking exp_deferred_qs into next GP Lai Jiangshan
2019-10-31 13:43   ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-10-31 18:19     ` Lai Jiangshan
2019-10-31 19:00       ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-10-31 10:07 ` [PATCH 02/11] rcu: fix bug when rcu_exp_handler() in nested interrupt Lai Jiangshan
2019-10-31 13:47   ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-10-31 14:20     ` Lai Jiangshan
2019-10-31 14:31     ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-10-31 15:14       ` Lai Jiangshan
2019-10-31 18:52         ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-11-01  0:19           ` Boqun Feng
2019-11-01  2:29             ` Lai Jiangshan
2019-10-31 10:07 ` [PATCH 03/11] rcu: clean up rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_irqrestore() Lai Jiangshan
2019-10-31 13:52   ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-10-31 15:25     ` Lai Jiangshan
2019-10-31 18:57       ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-10-31 19:02         ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-10-31 10:07 ` [PATCH 04/11] rcu: cleanup rcu_preempt_deferred_qs() Lai Jiangshan
2019-10-31 14:10   ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-10-31 14:35     ` Lai Jiangshan
2019-10-31 15:07       ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-10-31 18:33         ` Lai Jiangshan
2019-10-31 22:45           ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-10-31 10:08 ` [PATCH 05/11] rcu: clean all rcu_read_unlock_special after report qs Lai Jiangshan
2019-11-01 11:54   ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-10-31 10:08 ` [PATCH 06/11] rcu: clear t->rcu_read_unlock_special in one go Lai Jiangshan
2019-11-01 12:10   ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-11-01 16:58     ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-10-31 10:08 ` [PATCH 07/11] rcu: set special.b.deferred_qs before wake_up() Lai Jiangshan
2019-10-31 10:08 ` [PATCH 08/11] rcu: don't use negative ->rcu_read_lock_nesting Lai Jiangshan
2019-11-01 12:33   ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-11-16 13:04     ` Lai Jiangshan
2019-11-17 21:53       ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-11-18  1:54         ` Lai Jiangshan
2019-11-18 14:57           ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-10-31 10:08 ` [PATCH 09/11] rcu: wrap usages of rcu_read_lock_nesting Lai Jiangshan
2019-10-31 10:08 ` [PATCH 10/11] rcu: clear the special.b.need_qs in rcu_note_context_switch() Lai Jiangshan
2019-10-31 10:08 ` [PATCH 11/11] x86,rcu: use percpu rcu_preempt_depth Lai Jiangshan
2019-11-01 12:58   ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2019-11-01 13:13     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-01 14:30       ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-11-01 15:32         ` Lai Jiangshan
2019-11-01 16:21           ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-11-01 15:47       ` Lai Jiangshan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191101125816.GD17910@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72 \
    --to=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=Babu.Moger@amd.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
    --cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=duyuyang@gmail.com \
    --cc=dwindsor@gmail.com \
    --cc=elena.reshetova@intel.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=laijs@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=ldv@altlinux.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rgb@redhat.com \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).