From: Alexander Popov <alex.popov@linux.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>,
Security Officers <security@kernel.org>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Alexander Popov <alex.popov@linux.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/1] media: vivid: Fix wrong locking that causes race conditions on streaming stop
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2019 22:03:27 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191102190327.24903-1-alex.popov@linux.com> (raw)
There is the same incorrect approach to locking implemented in
vivid_stop_generating_vid_cap(), vivid_stop_generating_vid_out() and
sdr_cap_stop_streaming().
These functions are called during streaming stopping with vivid_dev.mutex
locked. And they all do the same mistake while stopping their kthreads,
which need to lock this mutex as well. See the example from
vivid_stop_generating_vid_cap():
/* shutdown control thread */
vivid_grab_controls(dev, false);
mutex_unlock(&dev->mutex);
kthread_stop(dev->kthread_vid_cap);
dev->kthread_vid_cap = NULL;
mutex_lock(&dev->mutex);
But when this mutex is unlocked, another vb2_fop_read() can lock it
instead of vivid_thread_vid_cap() and manipulate the buffer queue.
That causes a use-after-free access later.
To fix those issues let's:
1. avoid unlocking the mutex in vivid_stop_generating_vid_cap(),
vivid_stop_generating_vid_out() and sdr_cap_stop_streaming();
2. use mutex_trylock() with schedule_timeout() in the loops
of the vivid kthread handlers.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Popov <alex.popov@linux.com>
Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---
drivers/media/platform/vivid/vivid-kthread-cap.c | 8 +++++---
drivers/media/platform/vivid/vivid-kthread-out.c | 8 +++++---
drivers/media/platform/vivid/vivid-sdr-cap.c | 8 +++++---
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/vivid/vivid-kthread-cap.c b/drivers/media/platform/vivid/vivid-kthread-cap.c
index 003319d7816d..27b9c78d2d05 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/vivid/vivid-kthread-cap.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/vivid/vivid-kthread-cap.c
@@ -796,7 +796,11 @@ static int vivid_thread_vid_cap(void *data)
if (kthread_should_stop())
break;
- mutex_lock(&dev->mutex);
+ if (!mutex_trylock(&dev->mutex)) {
+ schedule_timeout(1);
+ continue;
+ }
+
cur_jiffies = jiffies;
if (dev->cap_seq_resync) {
dev->jiffies_vid_cap = cur_jiffies;
@@ -956,8 +960,6 @@ void vivid_stop_generating_vid_cap(struct vivid_dev *dev, bool *pstreaming)
/* shutdown control thread */
vivid_grab_controls(dev, false);
- mutex_unlock(&dev->mutex);
kthread_stop(dev->kthread_vid_cap);
dev->kthread_vid_cap = NULL;
- mutex_lock(&dev->mutex);
}
diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/vivid/vivid-kthread-out.c b/drivers/media/platform/vivid/vivid-kthread-out.c
index ce5bcda2348c..a657b0d20e2f 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/vivid/vivid-kthread-out.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/vivid/vivid-kthread-out.c
@@ -143,7 +143,11 @@ static int vivid_thread_vid_out(void *data)
if (kthread_should_stop())
break;
- mutex_lock(&dev->mutex);
+ if (!mutex_trylock(&dev->mutex)) {
+ schedule_timeout(1);
+ continue;
+ }
+
cur_jiffies = jiffies;
if (dev->out_seq_resync) {
dev->jiffies_vid_out = cur_jiffies;
@@ -301,8 +305,6 @@ void vivid_stop_generating_vid_out(struct vivid_dev *dev, bool *pstreaming)
/* shutdown control thread */
vivid_grab_controls(dev, false);
- mutex_unlock(&dev->mutex);
kthread_stop(dev->kthread_vid_out);
dev->kthread_vid_out = NULL;
- mutex_lock(&dev->mutex);
}
diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/vivid/vivid-sdr-cap.c b/drivers/media/platform/vivid/vivid-sdr-cap.c
index 9acc709b0740..590080716962 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/vivid/vivid-sdr-cap.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/vivid/vivid-sdr-cap.c
@@ -141,7 +141,11 @@ static int vivid_thread_sdr_cap(void *data)
if (kthread_should_stop())
break;
- mutex_lock(&dev->mutex);
+ if (!mutex_trylock(&dev->mutex)) {
+ schedule_timeout(1);
+ continue;
+ }
+
cur_jiffies = jiffies;
if (dev->sdr_cap_seq_resync) {
dev->jiffies_sdr_cap = cur_jiffies;
@@ -303,10 +307,8 @@ static void sdr_cap_stop_streaming(struct vb2_queue *vq)
}
/* shutdown control thread */
- mutex_unlock(&dev->mutex);
kthread_stop(dev->kthread_sdr_cap);
dev->kthread_sdr_cap = NULL;
- mutex_lock(&dev->mutex);
}
static void sdr_cap_buf_request_complete(struct vb2_buffer *vb)
--
2.21.0
next reply other threads:[~2019-11-02 19:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-02 19:03 Alexander Popov [this message]
2019-11-02 20:50 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] media: vivid: Fix wrong locking that causes race conditions on streaming stop Alexander Popov
2019-11-03 16:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-11-03 21:44 ` Alexander Popov
2019-11-03 22:17 ` [PATCH v4 " Alexander Popov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191102190327.24903-1-alex.popov@linux.com \
--to=alex.popov@linux.com \
--cc=hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab+samsung@kernel.org \
--cc=security@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).