From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68F47CA9ED5 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 05:26:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4979B2084D for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 05:26:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387573AbfKEFZ7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Nov 2019 00:25:59 -0500 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:37918 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725991AbfKEFZ7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Nov 2019 00:25:59 -0500 Received: from viro by ZenIV.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iRrLm-0002LQ-63; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 05:25:54 +0000 Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 05:25:54 +0000 From: Al Viro To: "Martin K. Petersen" Cc: Linus Torvalds , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCHES] drivers/scsi/sg.c uaccess cleanups/fixes Message-ID: <20191105052554.GT26530@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20191011001104.GJ26530@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20191013181333.GK26530@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20191013191050.GL26530@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20191016202540.GQ26530@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20191017193659.GA18702@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 11:54:20PM -0500, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > > Hi Al! > > > I've got a series that presumably fixes and cleans the things up > > in that area; it didn't get any serious testing (the kernel builds > > and boots, smartctl works as well as it used to, but that's not > > worth much - all it says is that SG_IO doesn't fail terribly; > > I don't have any test setup for really working with /dev/sg*). > > I tested this last week without noticing any problems. > > What's your plan for this series? Want me to queue it up for 5.5? I can put it into vfs.git into a never-rebased branch or you could put it into scsi tree - up to you...