linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [patch for-5.3 0/4] revert immediate fallback to remote hugepages
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 14:02:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191105130253.GO22672@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1910291623050.9914@chino.kir.corp.google.com>

On Tue 29-10-19 16:25:17, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Oct 2019, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 16:15:49 +0100 Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > > 
> > > > 1. local node only THP allocation with no reclaim, just compaction.
> > > > 2. for madvised VMA's or when synchronous compaction is enabled always - THP
> > > >    allocation from any node with effort determined by global defrag setting
> > > >    and VMA madvise
> > > > 3. fallback to base pages on any node
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> > > 
> > > I've given this a try and here are the results of my previous testcase
> > > (memory full of page cache).
> > 
> > Thanks, I'll queue this for some more testing.  At some point we should
> > decide on a suitable set of Fixes: tags and a backporting strategy, if any?
> > 
> 
> I'd strongly suggest that Andrea test this patch out on his workload on 
> hosts where all nodes are low on memory because based on my understanding 
> of his reported issue this would result in swap storms reemerging but 
> worse this time because they wouldn't be constrained only locally.  (This 
> patch causes us to no longer circumvent excessive reclaim when using 
> MADV_HUGEPAGE.)

Could you be more specific on why this would be the case? My testing is
doesn't show any such signs and I am effectivelly testing memory low
situation. The amount of reclaimed memory matches the amount of
requested memory.

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-05 13:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-04 19:54 [patch for-5.3 0/4] revert immediate fallback to remote hugepages David Rientjes
2019-09-04 19:54 ` [rfc 3/4] mm, page_alloc: avoid expensive reclaim when compaction may not succeed David Rientjes
2019-09-05  9:00   ` Michal Hocko
2019-09-05 11:22     ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-09-05 20:53       ` Mike Kravetz
2019-09-06 20:16         ` David Rientjes
2019-09-06 20:49       ` David Rientjes
2019-09-04 20:43 ` [patch for-5.3 0/4] revert immediate fallback to remote hugepages Linus Torvalds
2019-09-05 20:54   ` David Rientjes
2019-09-07 19:51     ` David Rientjes
2019-09-07 19:55       ` Linus Torvalds
2019-09-08  1:50         ` David Rientjes
2019-09-08 12:47           ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-09-08 20:45             ` David Rientjes
2019-09-09  8:37               ` Michal Hocko
2019-09-04 20:55 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2019-09-05 21:06   ` David Rientjes
2019-09-09 19:30     ` Michal Hocko
2019-09-25  7:08       ` Michal Hocko
2019-09-26 19:03         ` David Rientjes
2019-09-27  7:48           ` Michal Hocko
2019-09-28 20:59             ` Linus Torvalds
2019-09-30 11:28               ` Michal Hocko
2019-10-01  5:43                 ` Michal Hocko
2019-10-01  8:37                   ` Michal Hocko
2019-10-18 14:15                     ` Michal Hocko
2019-10-23 11:03                       ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-10-24 18:59                         ` David Rientjes
2019-10-29 14:14                           ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-10-29 15:15                             ` Michal Hocko
2019-10-29 21:33                               ` Andrew Morton
2019-10-29 21:45                                 ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-10-29 23:25                                 ` David Rientjes
2019-11-05 13:02                                   ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2019-11-06  1:01                                     ` David Rientjes
2019-11-06  7:35                                       ` Michal Hocko
2019-11-06 21:32                                         ` David Rientjes
2019-11-13 11:20                                           ` Mel Gorman
2019-11-25  0:10                                             ` David Rientjes
2019-11-25 11:47                                               ` Michal Hocko
2019-11-25 20:38                                                 ` David Rientjes
2019-11-25 21:34                                                   ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-10-01 13:50                   ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-10-01 20:31                     ` David Rientjes
2019-10-01 21:54                       ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-10-02 10:34                         ` Michal Hocko
2019-10-02 22:32                           ` David Rientjes
2019-10-03  8:00                             ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-10-04 12:18                               ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191105130253.GO22672@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).