From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ACF7C5DF62 for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 09:52:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46944217F4 for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 09:52:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ffwll.ch header.i=@ffwll.ch header.b="WCwD54c3" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731597AbfKFJwT (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Nov 2019 04:52:19 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f67.google.com ([209.85.221.67]:43051 "EHLO mail-wr1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726143AbfKFJwS (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Nov 2019 04:52:18 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f67.google.com with SMTP id n1so24933149wra.10 for ; Wed, 06 Nov 2019 01:52:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ffwll.ch; s=google; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=uCkx2NozxMaeNkrsz7EMpm21ukg71K77/waY5+1TSls=; b=WCwD54c3npOPHXAP4xGIZoi+KxNI0Wra0FUQc+WOKuP65BTREKcW1l2Px8Cy5d7Hvf RsnnX7VENbarQfmGgwgmypWiHj4Noz1Ts34CB2uRBr36vyCBKg3YP1rnO8oJ2+hKTnnA 2mcXMzgkd/9aX8Mm+HBqytVbf8+3bOW6tICyY= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=uCkx2NozxMaeNkrsz7EMpm21ukg71K77/waY5+1TSls=; b=p/L/HeG8XJ87HvVHce12UR3pQxBw/GTKPhEUDUVVa3bNAcHjYNYHN8XqVEfPR/KypS 33IJyqefK7jGrVcI65S9ZHj2NThgLVbbc1YuJkyBv2Kopa5FFGdx+Y3rfDS9qn0WWokr GpOXF02bhf/5SwkkULYCj2/guusYv11zclBGCdW0vwh971vaHzeGQy5LTxsGMFjZGSWV XvD8QsWOybynr9xo+Ada7YoYLVJxvkOEA8dO2lWJDguC+4Kkd25eZq4PCVlKiq4bJaGd rGPzI3bkqFsKoGxUIiQWmL3r/7dKSZ3/FZRtQgWfklYGQR1oyBCKDWI5Mnrb75pzkATC MLZQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUQJHEfpaBOLruu/wBXceBmu96aBDL5iV50RxJ7YfMD7Em9oKLd 9EVjaISwpDclMmfnHSHVO6dS/Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy8SOiPH2SZzS90gKSp/dp4epdL+H8v3Vlhplrbbnp18EozMW5rOerNGE8QMR95g/PO5WVynA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:8011:: with SMTP id 17mr1804211wrk.367.1573033937277; Wed, 06 Nov 2019 01:52:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from phenom.ffwll.local (212-51-149-96.fiber7.init7.net. [212.51.149.96]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u4sm13466822wrq.22.2019.11.06.01.52.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 06 Nov 2019 01:52:16 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 10:51:32 +0100 From: Daniel Vetter To: Laurent Pinchart Cc: Daniel Vetter , Linus Walleij , Dmitry Torokhov , Andrzej Hajda , Neil Armstrong , Jonas Karlman , Jernej Skrabec , David Airlie , Heikki Krogerus , "open list:DRM PANEL DRIVERS" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: ti-tfp410: switch to using fwnode_gpiod_get_index() Message-ID: <20191106095132.GA23790@phenom.ffwll.local> Mail-Followup-To: Laurent Pinchart , Linus Walleij , Dmitry Torokhov , Andrzej Hajda , Neil Armstrong , Jonas Karlman , Jernej Skrabec , David Airlie , Heikki Krogerus , "open list:DRM PANEL DRIVERS" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" References: <20191014184320.GA161094@dtor-ws> <20191105004050.GU57214@dtor-ws> <20191105195323.GC4869@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191105195323.GC4869@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> X-Operating-System: Linux phenom 5.2.0-3-amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 09:53:23PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 04:41:41PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 4:29 PM Linus Walleij wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 1:40 AM Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 11:43:20AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > > > > > > Instead of fwnode_get_named_gpiod() that I plan to hide away, let's use > > > > > the new fwnode_gpiod_get_index() that mimics gpiod_get_index(), but > > > > > works with arbitrary firmware node. > > > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart > > > > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > > > Andrzej, Neil, > > > > > > > > > > This depends on the new code that can be bound in > > > > > ib-fwnode-gpiod-get-index immutable branch of Linus' Walleij tree: > > > > > > > > > > git pull git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-gpio.git ib-fwnode-gpiod-get-index > > > > > > > > > > I hope that it would be possible to pull in this immutable branch and > > > > > not wait until after 5.5 merge window, or, alternatively, merge through > > > > > Linus Walleij's tree. > > > > > > > > Any chance this could be merged, please? > > > > > > I'm happy to merge it into the GPIO tree if some DRM maintainer can > > > provide an ACK. > > > > Ack. > > > > > Getting ACK from DRM people is problematic and a bit of friction in the > > > community, DVetter usually advice to seek mutual reviews etc, but IMO > > > it would be better if some people felt more compelled to review stuff > > > eventually. (And that has the problem that it doesn't scale.) > > > > This has a review already plus if you merge your implied review. > > That's more than good enough imo, so not seeing the issue here? > > Isn't the issue that the patch should have been picked by someone for > drm-misc ? It requires prep work that isn't in drm-misc I thought? Anyway, Linus has commit rights to drm-misc, could also push it there. Plus you have, except you don't want it. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch