linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 26/28] xfs: use xfs_ail_push_all in xfs_reclaim_inodes
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 12:22:15 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191106172215.GD37080@bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191031234618.15403-27-david@fromorbit.com>

On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 10:46:16AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> 
> If we are reclaiming all inodes, it is likely we need to flush the
> entire AIL to do that. We have mechanisms to do that without needing
> to push to a specific LSN.
> 
> Convert xfs_relaim_all_inodes() to use xfs_ail_push_all variant so
> we can get rid of the hacky xfs_ail_push_sync() scaffolding we used
> to support the intermediate stages of the non-blocking reclaim
> changeset.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c     | 17 +++++++++++------
>  fs/xfs/xfs_trans_ail.c  | 32 --------------------------------
>  fs/xfs/xfs_trans_priv.h |  2 --
>  3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
> index 71a729e29260..11bf4768d491 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
...
> @@ -1066,13 +1074,10 @@ xfs_reclaim_all_inodes(
>  				      xfs_inode_reclaim_isolate, &ra, to_free);
>  		xfs_dispose_inodes(&ra.freeable);
>  
> -		if (freed == 0) {
> +		if (freed == 0)
>  			xfs_log_force(mp, XFS_LOG_SYNC);
> -			xfs_ail_push_all(mp->m_ail);
> -		} else if (ra.lowest_lsn != NULLCOMMITLSN) {
> -			xfs_ail_push_sync(mp->m_ail, ra.lowest_lsn);
> -		}
> -		cond_resched();
> +		else if (ra.dirty_skipped)
> +			congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/10);

Why not use xfs_ail_push_all_sync() in this function and skip the direct
stall? This is only used in the unmount and quiesce paths so the big
hammer approach seems reasonable. As it is, the former already calls
xfs_ail_push_all_sync() before xfs_reclaim_all_inodes() and the latter
calls xfs_log_force(mp, XFS_LOG_SYNC).

Brian

>  	}
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_ail.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_ail.c
> index 3e1d0e1439e2..685a21cd24c0 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_ail.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_ail.c
> @@ -662,36 +662,6 @@ xfs_ail_push_all(
>  		xfs_ail_push(ailp, threshold_lsn);
>  }
>  
> -/*
> - * Push the AIL to a specific lsn and wait for it to complete.
> - */
> -void
> -xfs_ail_push_sync(
> -	struct xfs_ail		*ailp,
> -	xfs_lsn_t		threshold_lsn)
> -{
> -	struct xfs_log_item	*lip;
> -	DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
> -
> -	spin_lock(&ailp->ail_lock);
> -	while ((lip = xfs_ail_min(ailp)) != NULL) {
> -		prepare_to_wait(&ailp->ail_push, &wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> -		if (XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(ailp->ail_mount) ||
> -		    XFS_LSN_CMP(threshold_lsn, lip->li_lsn) < 0)
> -			break;
> -		if (XFS_LSN_CMP(threshold_lsn, ailp->ail_target) > 0)
> -			ailp->ail_target = threshold_lsn;
> -		wake_up_process(ailp->ail_task);
> -		spin_unlock(&ailp->ail_lock);
> -		schedule();
> -		spin_lock(&ailp->ail_lock);
> -	}
> -	spin_unlock(&ailp->ail_lock);
> -
> -	finish_wait(&ailp->ail_push, &wait);
> -}
> -
> -
>  /*
>   * Push out all items in the AIL immediately and wait until the AIL is empty.
>   */
> @@ -732,7 +702,6 @@ xfs_ail_update_finish(
>  	if (!XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(mp))
>  		xlog_assign_tail_lsn_locked(mp);
>  
> -	wake_up_all(&ailp->ail_push);
>  	if (list_empty(&ailp->ail_head))
>  		wake_up_all(&ailp->ail_empty);
>  	spin_unlock(&ailp->ail_lock);
> @@ -889,7 +858,6 @@ xfs_trans_ail_init(
>  	spin_lock_init(&ailp->ail_lock);
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ailp->ail_buf_list);
>  	init_waitqueue_head(&ailp->ail_empty);
> -	init_waitqueue_head(&ailp->ail_push);
>  
>  	ailp->ail_task = kthread_run(xfsaild, ailp, "xfsaild/%s",
>  			ailp->ail_mount->m_fsname);
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_priv.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_priv.h
> index 1b6f4bbd47c0..35655eac01a6 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_priv.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_priv.h
> @@ -61,7 +61,6 @@ struct xfs_ail {
>  	int			ail_log_flush;
>  	struct list_head	ail_buf_list;
>  	wait_queue_head_t	ail_empty;
> -	wait_queue_head_t	ail_push;
>  };
>  
>  /*
> @@ -114,7 +113,6 @@ xfs_trans_ail_remove(
>  }
>  
>  void			xfs_ail_push(struct xfs_ail *, xfs_lsn_t);
> -void			xfs_ail_push_sync(struct xfs_ail *, xfs_lsn_t);
>  void			xfs_ail_push_all(struct xfs_ail *);
>  void			xfs_ail_push_all_sync(struct xfs_ail *);
>  struct xfs_log_item	*xfs_ail_min(struct xfs_ail  *ailp);
> -- 
> 2.24.0.rc0
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-06 17:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-31 23:45 [PATCH 00/28] mm, xfs: non-blocking inode reclaim Dave Chinner
2019-10-31 23:45 ` [PATCH 01/28] xfs: Lower CIL flush limit for large logs Dave Chinner
2019-10-31 23:45 ` [PATCH 02/28] xfs: Throttle commits on delayed background CIL push Dave Chinner
2019-11-01 12:04   ` Brian Foster
2019-11-01 21:40     ` Dave Chinner
2019-11-04 22:48       ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-10-31 23:45 ` [PATCH 03/28] xfs: don't allow log IO to be throttled Dave Chinner
2019-10-31 23:45 ` [PATCH 04/28] xfs: Improve metadata buffer reclaim accountability Dave Chinner
2019-11-01 12:05   ` Brian Foster
2019-11-04 23:21   ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-10-31 23:45 ` [PATCH 05/28] xfs: correctly acount for reclaimable slabs Dave Chinner
2019-10-31 23:45 ` [PATCH 06/28] xfs: factor common AIL item deletion code Dave Chinner
2019-11-04 23:16   ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-10-31 23:45 ` [PATCH 07/28] xfs: tail updates only need to occur when LSN changes Dave Chinner
2019-11-04 23:18   ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-10-31 23:45 ` [PATCH 08/28] xfs: factor inode lookup from xfs_ifree_cluster Dave Chinner
2019-11-01 12:05   ` Brian Foster
2019-11-04 23:20   ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-10-31 23:45 ` [PATCH 09/28] mm: directed shrinker work deferral Dave Chinner
2019-11-04 15:25   ` Brian Foster
2019-11-14 20:49     ` Dave Chinner
2019-11-15 17:21       ` Brian Foster
2019-11-18  0:49         ` Dave Chinner
2019-11-19 15:12           ` Brian Foster
2019-10-31 23:46 ` [PATCH 10/28] shrinkers: use defer_work for GFP_NOFS sensitive shrinkers Dave Chinner
2019-10-31 23:46 ` [PATCH 11/28] mm: factor shrinker work calculations Dave Chinner
2019-11-02 10:55   ` kbuild test robot
2019-11-04 15:29   ` Brian Foster
2019-11-14 20:59     ` Dave Chinner
2019-10-31 23:46 ` [PATCH 12/28] shrinker: defer work only to kswapd Dave Chinner
2019-11-04 15:29   ` Brian Foster
2019-11-14 21:11     ` Dave Chinner
2019-11-15 17:23       ` Brian Foster
2019-10-31 23:46 ` [PATCH 13/28] shrinker: clean up variable types and tracepoints Dave Chinner
2019-11-04 15:30   ` Brian Foster
2019-10-31 23:46 ` [PATCH 14/28] mm: reclaim_state records pages reclaimed, not slabs Dave Chinner
2019-11-04 19:58   ` Brian Foster
2019-10-31 23:46 ` [PATCH 15/28] mm: back off direct reclaim on excessive shrinker deferral Dave Chinner
2019-11-04 19:58   ` Brian Foster
2019-11-14 21:28     ` Dave Chinner
2019-10-31 23:46 ` [PATCH 16/28] mm: kswapd backoff for shrinkers Dave Chinner
2019-11-04 19:58   ` Brian Foster
2019-11-14 21:41     ` Dave Chinner
2019-10-31 23:46 ` [PATCH 17/28] xfs: synchronous AIL pushing Dave Chinner
2019-11-05 17:05   ` Brian Foster
2019-10-31 23:46 ` [PATCH 18/28] xfs: don't block kswapd in inode reclaim Dave Chinner
2019-10-31 23:46 ` [PATCH 19/28] xfs: reduce kswapd blocking on inode locking Dave Chinner
2019-11-05 17:05   ` Brian Foster
2019-10-31 23:46 ` [PATCH 20/28] xfs: kill background reclaim work Dave Chinner
2019-11-05 17:05   ` Brian Foster
2019-10-31 23:46 ` [PATCH 21/28] xfs: use AIL pushing for inode reclaim IO Dave Chinner
2019-11-05 17:06   ` Brian Foster
2019-10-31 23:46 ` [PATCH 22/28] xfs: remove mode from xfs_reclaim_inodes() Dave Chinner
2019-10-31 23:46 ` [PATCH 23/28] xfs: track reclaimable inodes using a LRU list Dave Chinner
2019-10-31 23:46 ` [PATCH 24/28] xfs: reclaim inodes from the LRU Dave Chinner
2019-11-06 17:21   ` Brian Foster
2019-11-14 21:51     ` Dave Chinner
2019-10-31 23:46 ` [PATCH 25/28] xfs: remove unusued old inode reclaim code Dave Chinner
2019-11-06 17:21   ` Brian Foster
2019-10-31 23:46 ` [PATCH 26/28] xfs: use xfs_ail_push_all in xfs_reclaim_inodes Dave Chinner
2019-11-06 17:22   ` Brian Foster [this message]
2019-11-14 21:53     ` Dave Chinner
2019-10-31 23:46 ` [PATCH 27/28] rwsem: introduce down/up_write_non_owner Dave Chinner
2019-10-31 23:46 ` [PATCH 28/28] xfs: rework unreferenced inode lookups Dave Chinner
2019-11-06 22:18   ` Brian Foster
2019-11-14 22:16     ` Dave Chinner
2019-11-15 13:13       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-15 17:26       ` Brian Foster
2019-11-18  1:00         ` Dave Chinner
2019-11-19 15:13           ` Brian Foster
2019-11-19 21:18             ` Dave Chinner
2019-11-20 12:42               ` Brian Foster

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191106172215.GD37080@bfoster \
    --to=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).