From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E62A7C5DF65 for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 20:18:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B783C217F9 for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 20:18:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1573071504; bh=RZc8ZIMEe2SCefuRLeimiRuazGPQHYNlwf5zWfHpY8o=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=M8VfIlquaCbrDD2WO+E5pyAM53iBvMDiJUz+Sw8cnvgYTvdWVXeuTRHHyVhY33ksQ MbOg8WNhHLJdgX8XTRryvHx/NkDNetjkOwYkN2ObmrlU/0A6X9cH4jd1/Vbz2Nmf4q tTHfqK6DnblMyhEl0TqBKQedwu4JoKXsQJHDb0b8= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732094AbfKFUSX (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Nov 2019 15:18:23 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:55378 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726934AbfKFUSX (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Nov 2019 15:18:23 -0500 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EEEFD214D8; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 20:18:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1573071501; bh=RZc8ZIMEe2SCefuRLeimiRuazGPQHYNlwf5zWfHpY8o=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=S4njCz4cCOugJAg7XCTtPKSoLtiwTDJKSJIWekkzYNK5yqOg2t3om1F7o/GK/9Ib/ wL7R00GiJi5KniNApXYupyAmsG+AyCx8G1WlGm0OQlIEOHhjCBMqZ22XZi5IhkLOse 3YCzYdyYHCrcgnTwx8qVCKkP0oEx9kv7cdEuTeI8= Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 21:18:18 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Pavel Machek Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/93] 4.19.81-stable review Message-ID: <20191106201818.GA105063@kroah.com> References: <20191027203251.029297948@linuxfoundation.org> <20191029162419.cumhku6smn2x2bq4@ucw.cz> <20191029180233.GA587491@kroah.com> <20191106185932.GA2183@amd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191106185932.GA2183@amd> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 07:59:32PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Tue 2019-10-29 19:02:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 05:24:19PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.81 release. > > > > There are 93 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > > let me know. > > > > > > > > Responses should be made by Tue 29 Oct 2019 08:27:02 PM UTC. > > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > > Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 10:19:29 +0100 > > > > From: Greg KH > > > > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton > > > > Subject: Linux 4.19.81 > > > > > > > [-- The following data is signed --] > > > > > > > I'm announcing the release of the 4.19.81 kernel. > > > > > > > All users of the 4.19 kernel series must upgrade. > > > > > > Am I confused or was the 4.19.81 released a bit early? > > > > I said: > > Responses should be made by Tue 29 Oct 2019 08:27:02 PM UTC. > > > > And I released at: > > Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 10:19:29 +0100 > > > > So really, I was a few minutes late :) > > I'm confused. You said "by Tue ... 08:27:02 PM UTC". That 8 PM is 20h, > but did the release on 10h GMT+1, or 9h UTC -- 9 AM.... so like 11 > hours early, if I got the timezones right. > > Does PM mean something else in the above context? Ugh, no, you are right, I was ignoring the PM thing, I thought the -u option to date would give me a 24 hour date string, and so I thought that was 8:27 in the morning. Let me mess around with 'date' to see if I can come up with a better string to use here. I guess: date --rfc-3339=seconds -u would probably be best? thanks, greg k-h