linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
	Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] sched/fair: Do not set skip buddy up the sched hierarchy
Date: Wed,  6 Nov 2019 14:14:48 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191106221448.225183-1-joshdon@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKfTPtDeMevgn0JFxjzUWhp4dS10T2MQSA9P82nOGX73xUjXoA@mail.gmail.com>

From: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>

Setting skip buddy all the way up the hierarchy does not play well
with intra-cgroup yield. One typical usecase of yield is when a
thread in a cgroup wants to yield CPU to another thread within the
same cgroup. For such a case, setting the skip buddy all the way up
the hierarchy is counter-productive, as that results in CPU being
yielded to a task in some other cgroup.

So, limit the skip effect only to the task requesting it.

Signed-off-by: Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>
---
Changelog since v1:
- As an optimization, skip clearing the skip buddy up the hierarchy
- Due to the above, it makes sense to inline __clear_buddies_skip; while
  we're at it, inline the other __clear_buddies* functions as well.

 kernel/sched/fair.c | 27 +++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 682a754ea3e1..dbac30e3cc08 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -4010,7 +4010,7 @@ enqueue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
 	}
 }
 
-static void __clear_buddies_last(struct sched_entity *se)
+static inline void __clear_buddies_last(struct sched_entity *se)
 {
 	for_each_sched_entity(se) {
 		struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
@@ -4021,7 +4021,7 @@ static void __clear_buddies_last(struct sched_entity *se)
 	}
 }
 
-static void __clear_buddies_next(struct sched_entity *se)
+static inline void __clear_buddies_next(struct sched_entity *se)
 {
 	for_each_sched_entity(se) {
 		struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
@@ -4032,15 +4032,12 @@ static void __clear_buddies_next(struct sched_entity *se)
 	}
 }
 
-static void __clear_buddies_skip(struct sched_entity *se)
+static inline void __clear_buddies_skip(struct sched_entity *se)
 {
-	for_each_sched_entity(se) {
-		struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
-		if (cfs_rq->skip != se)
-			break;
+	struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
 
+	if (cfs_rq->skip == se)
 		cfs_rq->skip = NULL;
-	}
 }
 
 static void clear_buddies(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
@@ -4051,8 +4048,7 @@ static void clear_buddies(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
 	if (cfs_rq->next == se)
 		__clear_buddies_next(se);
 
-	if (cfs_rq->skip == se)
-		__clear_buddies_skip(se);
+	__clear_buddies_skip(se);
 }
 
 static __always_inline void return_cfs_rq_runtime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq);
@@ -6647,8 +6643,15 @@ static void set_next_buddy(struct sched_entity *se)
 
 static void set_skip_buddy(struct sched_entity *se)
 {
-	for_each_sched_entity(se)
-		cfs_rq_of(se)->skip = se;
+	/*
+	 * One typical usecase of yield is when a thread in a cgroup
+	 * wants to yield CPU to another thread within the same cgroup.
+	 * For such a case, setting the skip buddy all the way up the
+	 * hierarchy is counter-productive, as that results in CPU being
+	 * yielded to a task in some other cgroup. So, only set skip
+	 * for the task requesting it.
+	 */
+	cfs_rq_of(se)->skip = se;
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.24.0.rc1.363.gb1bccd3e3d-goog


  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-06 22:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-31 18:45 [PATCH] sched/fair: Do not set skip buddy up the sched hierarchy Josh Don
2019-11-04 14:54 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-11-06 22:14   ` Josh Don [this message]
2019-12-04 20:06 [PATCH v2] " Josh Don
2019-12-06  7:57 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-12-06 22:13   ` Josh Don
2019-12-09  9:18     ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-12-12 22:19       ` Josh Don
2019-12-18 11:36         ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-12-18 20:02           ` Josh Don
2019-12-12  8:05     ` Vincent Guittot
2019-12-17 19:58       ` Josh Don
2019-12-17 20:42         ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-12-17 21:00           ` Greg Kroah-Hartman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191106221448.225183-1-joshdon@google.com \
    --to=joshdon@google.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).