On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 07:26:43PM +0100, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> LDO9 and LDO10 were listed with the same enable bits.
> That looks insane and there are no provisions in the code for handling such
> a special case. Also other out-of-tree drivers use a separate bit to
> enable it.

This definitely looks like a bug but without a datasheet or testing it's
worrying guessing at the register bit to use for the enable for the
second LDO...