From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A6A7C432C3 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 09:35:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58A91206C0 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 09:35:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="dn3wCVm6" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726318AbfKNJfa (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Nov 2019 04:35:30 -0500 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:46782 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726000AbfKNJfa (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Nov 2019 04:35:30 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=hKpjmLesrUPpBJqtJ5Nv0zqyYUIewgBRvRBi/Ofh8CU=; b=dn3wCVm6/0qObzah1mNHHkMbz DLVFgwlKaypFBsgdTLyVfEuprn9NShSgm47FmGtJLZrCxLdtbpFIy2Ol8j17K9K9ArL3ACoo5Llu6 8WIDZI41RZ3SmJsiR0Jha38nV2Q/rNFG6b+PUgu+p4j9VjwvtRmxdP/BXbGK1X/7SQeOfBNpBD29n SmNSLFBgVNQ/uaIS/2hTjmzE+35zkFmbEe+sTNIZNqHCzsCtxUc3ydK6NlTR45nnK3oeiEs71XhrK e4VL+uuMv4LhzvQquSUTwodOeXAoDCaA7ja5mdm+zDOPxo1tOQX/snWJ+sTobe5edE5FSGTTN84ga gCO4Axldw==; Received: from j217100.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.217.100] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iVBWs-00033G-7o; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 09:35:06 +0000 Received: from hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net [192.168.1.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A88C301120; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 10:33:53 +0100 (CET) Received: by hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2A87729DF1251; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 10:35:01 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 10:35:01 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Ian Rogers Cc: Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , Andrew Morton , Masahiro Yamada , Kees Cook , Catalin Marinas , Petr Mladek , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Qian Cai , Joe Lawrence , Tetsuo Handa , Sri Krishna chowdary , "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" , Andy Shevchenko , Changbin Du , Ard Biesheuvel , "David S. Miller" , Kent Overstreet , Gary Hook , Arnd Bergmann , Kan Liang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stephane Eranian , Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/10] lib: introduce generic min max heap Message-ID: <20191114093501.GN4131@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20191114003042.85252-1-irogers@google.com> <20191114003042.85252-3-irogers@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191114003042.85252-3-irogers@google.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 04:30:34PM -0800, Ian Rogers wrote: > +/* > + * Remove the minimum element and then push the given element. The > + * implementation performs 1 sift (O(log2(size))) and is therefore more > + * efficient than a pop followed by a push that does 2. > + */ > +static void heap_pop_push(struct min_max_heap *heap, > + const void *element, > + const struct min_max_heap_callbacks *func) > +{ > + char *data = (char *)heap->data; > + > + memcpy(data, element, func->elem_size); > + heapify(heap, 0, func); > +} I'm not a fan of this operation. It has a weird name and it is utterly trivial.