linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: Jonathan Richardson <jonathan.richardson@broadcom.com>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jslaby@suse.com,
	sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Scott Branden <scott.branden@broadcom.com>,
	Ray Jui <ray.jui@broadcom.com>,
	Srinath Mannam <srinath.mannam@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: console output duplicated when registering additional consoles
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 10:57:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191114095737.wl5nvxu3w6p5thfc@pathway.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHrpVsW6jRUYK_mu+dLaBvucAAtUPQ0zcH6_NxsUsTrPewiY_w@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed 2019-11-13 17:28:45, Jonathan Richardson wrote:
> Adding printk maintainers.
> This commit seems to have introduced the error:
> 
> commit f92b070f2dc89a8ff1a0cc8b608e20abef894c7d
> Author: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
> Date:   Thu Sep 13 14:34:06 2018 +0200
> 
>     printk: Do not miss new messages when replaying the log
> 
> If I checkout to the commit before
> (a06b0c82a049d34d4dc273e8692ed0894458c468), the console output is
> normal when registering 2 bootconsoles and 2 normal consoles. I've
> added the log for 4.19.0-rc3 for comparison (previous version was
> 5.1.0). I don't think this commit took into account that more than one
> console could be registered. When the second console is registered,
> 'console_seq >= exclusive_console_stop_seq' is true (both are 0) and
> exclusive_console is always set to NULL resulting in the log being
> replayed again to the uart8250 console:

This race should not happen because Both exclusive_console and
exclusive_console_stop_seq are manipulated under console_lock.
And the log is replayed before console_lock is released.

>         /* Output to all consoles once old messages replayed. */
>         if (unlikely(exclusive_console &&
>                  console_seq >= exclusive_console_stop_seq)) {
>             exclusive_console = NULL;
>         }
> 
> I'm looking into it but any input is helpful. Thanks.

IMHO, the problem is that the log should not be replayed at all.
See the following code in register_console():

	/*
	 * If we have a bootconsole, and are switching to a real console,
	 * don't print everything out again, since when the boot console, and
	 * the real console are the same physical device, it's annoying to
	 * see the beginning boot messages twice
	 */
	if (bcon && ((newcon->flags & (CON_CONSDEV | CON_BOOT)) == CON_CONSDEV))
		newcon->flags &= ~CON_PRINTBUFFER;

I already see two problems there:

1. CON_PRINTBUFFER is cleared only when the new console has
   CON_CONSDEV flag set. It is set only for the console
   that is defined as the last on the command line.
   It is a so-called preferred console.

2. bcon is set to the first console in console_drivers list.
   It is the first registered boot console.

Sigh, this works for simple configuration. But it fails badly when
more different consoles are configured.

We should clear CON_PRINTBUFFER flag when the real console
replacing an already registered boot console is registered.

BTW: Similar bug is also at the end of register_console().
The boot consoles are unregistered only when the preferred
console is installed.

For a proper solution we would need to match boot and real
consoles that write messages into the physical device.
But I am afraid that there is no support for this.
con->match() callback compares the name defined on
the command line. And it has side effects (the matching
console is prepared for registration).

To be honest I am not much familiar with the device interface.
I am not sure if there is a way to detect the two drivers
use the same physical hardware.

Sigh, it is a huge historical mess. It would needed a lot
of work to clean it up.

Best Regards,
Petr

  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-14  9:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-07  1:09 console output duplicated when registering additional consoles Jonathan Richardson
2019-11-14  1:28 ` Jonathan Richardson
2019-11-14  9:57   ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2019-11-15  4:33     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-11-18 21:38       ` Jonathan Richardson
2019-11-19  0:34         ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-11-19 18:46           ` Jonathan Richardson
2019-11-21  9:33             ` Petr Mladek
2019-11-19 11:30         ` Petr Mladek
2019-11-19 18:36           ` Jonathan Richardson
2019-11-20  0:28           ` Sergey Senozhatsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191114095737.wl5nvxu3w6p5thfc@pathway.suse.cz \
    --to=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jonathan.richardson@broadcom.com \
    --cc=jslaby@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ray.jui@broadcom.com \
    --cc=scott.branden@broadcom.com \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
    --cc=srinath.mannam@broadcom.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).