On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 03:24:51PM +0100, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 08:26:33PM +0100, Andreas Kemnade wrote:

> > > Well, it is not just guessing, it is there in the url I referenced. But
> > > I would of course prefer a better source. At first I wanted to spread
> > > my findings.  

> > The URL you provided looked to be for a different part though?

> No, they just skip the rc5t in the name. Same situation in the vendor
> kernel for my device, but there is only a tarball online, so it is bad
> to reference. Everything is named there ricoh619 (or 61x). And on the chip is
> printed rc5t619.

Ah, OK - that's probably good enough then.  Let's leave it a bit and see
if we can get some more definite review though.