From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9418FC432C3 for ; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 15:53:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A46D208CE for ; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 15:53:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1573919592; bh=MrLJ86T+smoGDf0HCCf+yJ1xZ8hW11ko/jhzYVfFags=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=TWn8xwhzHa0c/Eh1vDNky0Pv0mAV8Gwpft112ySooj4ckS1E9EP6peZ33R/HXpjSL ytUqlaZSbjczI5tT0pwMTAR7wYvFup4xPOv6kZ4jl9YqIipIKj8NWhnLT4mrpmlvEQ fueGFKfmSw1exDwYj8UXNiPWfRwK276l6Y77VP8Y= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728202AbfKPPxK (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Nov 2019 10:53:10 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:34062 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731102AbfKPPxF (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Nov 2019 10:53:05 -0500 Received: from sasha-vm.mshome.net (unknown [50.234.116.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7CE7520859; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 15:53:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1573919585; bh=MrLJ86T+smoGDf0HCCf+yJ1xZ8hW11ko/jhzYVfFags=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=A9kOQjq8pgCYeqoVwu0ny/VQEkMb+UG7cosKYKUBCJ3bHPNGRFJRXanCKfVJzz0uH dizyESoQIzphsXiZXJ5wlpo+uXQ85inR8AsROyNqvXPniuxEWyk4VFPVmLBMjYjrzR TcKDwidlpeOKghfozkW/z8In2/4qz169Lh+vab70= From: Sasha Levin To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Valentin Schneider , Peter Zijlstra , Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com, Linus Torvalds , Thomas Gleixner , patrick.bellasi@arm.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, Ingo Molnar , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 76/99] sched/fair: Don't increase sd->balance_interval on newidle balance Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2019 10:50:39 -0500 Message-Id: <20191116155103.10971-76-sashal@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20191116155103.10971-1-sashal@kernel.org> References: <20191116155103.10971-1-sashal@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: Ignore Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Valentin Schneider [ Upstream commit 3f130a37c442d5c4d66531b240ebe9abfef426b5 ] When load_balance() fails to move some load because of task affinity, we end up increasing sd->balance_interval to delay the next periodic balance in the hopes that next time we look, that annoying pinned task(s) will be gone. However, idle_balance() pays no attention to sd->balance_interval, yet it will still lead to an increase in balance_interval in case of pinned tasks. If we're going through several newidle balances (e.g. we have a periodic task), this can lead to a huge increase of the balance_interval in a very small amount of time. To prevent that, don't increase the balance interval when going through a newidle balance. This is a similar approach to what is done in commit 58b26c4c0257 ("sched: Increment cache_nice_tries only on periodic lb"), where we disregard newidle balance and rely on periodic balance for more stable results. Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: patrick.bellasi@arm.com Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1537974727-30788-2-git-send-email-valentin.schneider@arm.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- kernel/sched/fair.c | 13 +++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index d8afae1bd5c5e..b765a58cf20f1 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -7950,13 +7950,22 @@ static int load_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq, sd->nr_balance_failed = 0; out_one_pinned: + ld_moved = 0; + + /* + * idle_balance() disregards balance intervals, so we could repeatedly + * reach this code, which would lead to balance_interval skyrocketting + * in a short amount of time. Skip the balance_interval increase logic + * to avoid that. + */ + if (env.idle == CPU_NEWLY_IDLE) + goto out; + /* tune up the balancing interval */ if (((env.flags & LBF_ALL_PINNED) && sd->balance_interval < MAX_PINNED_INTERVAL) || (sd->balance_interval < sd->max_interval)) sd->balance_interval *= 2; - - ld_moved = 0; out: return ld_moved; } -- 2.20.1