From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.7 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E79E8C432C0 for ; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 00:50:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBDFE215A5 for ; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 00:50:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727350AbfK1AuK (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Nov 2019 19:50:10 -0500 Received: from szxga07-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.35]:43646 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726984AbfK1AuK (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Nov 2019 19:50:10 -0500 Received: from DGGEMS408-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id B07C85E1684CE081F3A8; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 08:50:07 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost.localdomain.localdomain (10.175.113.25) by DGGEMS408-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.208) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.439.0; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 08:49:58 +0800 From: Kefeng Wang To: , , CC: , , , , , Kefeng Wang Subject: [PATCH 1/4] workqueue: Use pr_warn instead of pr_warning Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2019 08:47:49 +0800 Message-ID: <20191128004752.35268-2-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20191128004752.35268-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> References: <20191128004752.35268-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Originating-IP: [10.175.113.25] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Use pr_warn() instead of the remaining pr_warning() calls. Cc: Tejun Heo Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang --- kernel/workqueue.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c index bc88fd939f4e..cfc923558e04 100644 --- a/kernel/workqueue.c +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c @@ -4374,8 +4374,8 @@ void destroy_workqueue(struct workqueue_struct *wq) for_each_pwq(pwq, wq) { spin_lock_irq(&pwq->pool->lock); if (WARN_ON(pwq_busy(pwq))) { - pr_warning("%s: %s has the following busy pwq\n", - __func__, wq->name); + pr_warn("%s: %s has the following busy pwq\n", + __func__, wq->name); show_pwq(pwq); spin_unlock_irq(&pwq->pool->lock); mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex); -- 2.20.1