linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH V2 0/3] fix potential infinite loop in debugfs_remove_recursive
@ 2019-11-30  2:02 yu kuai
  2019-11-30  2:02 ` [PATCH V2 1/3] dcache: add a new enum type for 'dentry_d_lock_class' yu kuai
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: yu kuai @ 2019-11-30  2:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gregkh, rafael, viro, rostedt, oleg, mchehab+samsung, corbet,
	tytso, jmorris
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel, yukuai3, zhengbin13, yi.zhang,
	chenxiang66, xiexiuqi

The main purpose of this patchset is to fix potential infinite loop in
debugfs_remove_recursive. Al Viro want to refactor it
(https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191115184209.GT26530@ZenIV.linux.org.uk/).
I can't really tell if it's better. Since debugfs_remove_recursive is
still using 'simple_empty', whitch is wrong, I'm sending this patchset
just in case.

The first patch add a new enum type for 'dentry_d_lock_class'.The second
patch use the new enum type in 'simple_empty' to avoid confusion for
lockdep. The last patch fix potential infinite loop in
debugfs_remove_recursive by using 'simple_empty' instead of 'list_empty'.

changes in V2:
rename the new enum type in the first patch, add some comments.


yu kuai (3):
  dcache: add a new enum type for 'dentry_d_lock_class'
  fs/libfs.c: use 'spin_lock_nested' when taking 'd_lock' for dentry in
    simple_empty
  debugfs: fix potential infinite loop in debugfs_remove_recursive

 fs/debugfs/inode.c     |  7 +++++--
 fs/libfs.c             |  4 ++--
 include/linux/dcache.h | 11 ++++++++++-
 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

-- 
2.17.2


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [PATCH V2 1/3] dcache: add a new enum type for 'dentry_d_lock_class'
  2019-11-30  2:02 [PATCH V2 0/3] fix potential infinite loop in debugfs_remove_recursive yu kuai
@ 2019-11-30  2:02 ` yu kuai
  2019-11-30  3:43   ` Matthew Wilcox
  2019-11-30  2:02 ` [PATCH 2/3] fs/libfs.c: use 'spin_lock_nested' when taking 'd_lock' for dentry in simple_empty yu kuai
  2019-11-30  2:02 ` [PATCH 3/3] debugfs: fix potential infinite loop in debugfs_remove_recursive yu kuai
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: yu kuai @ 2019-11-30  2:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gregkh, rafael, viro, rostedt, oleg, mchehab+samsung, corbet,
	tytso, jmorris
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel, yukuai3, zhengbin13, yi.zhang,
	chenxiang66, xiexiuqi

'dentry_d_lock_class' can be used for spin_lock_nested in case lockdep
confused about two different dentry take the 'd_lock'.

However, a single 'DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED' may not be enough if more than
two dentry are involed. So, add in 'DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED_TWICE'.

Signed-off-by: yu kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
---
 include/linux/dcache.h | 11 ++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/dcache.h b/include/linux/dcache.h
index 10090f11ab95..830405b401ce 100644
--- a/include/linux/dcache.h
+++ b/include/linux/dcache.h
@@ -129,7 +129,16 @@ struct dentry {
 enum dentry_d_lock_class
 {
 	DENTRY_D_LOCK_NORMAL, /* implicitly used by plain spin_lock() APIs. */
-	DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED
+	/* 
+	 * used by spin_lock_nested when two d_lock need to be taken
+	 * at the same time
+	 */
+	DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED,
+	/*
+	 * used by spin_lock_nested when three d_lock need to be taken
+	 * at the same time
+	 */
+	DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED_TWICE
 };
 
 struct dentry_operations {
-- 
2.17.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/3] fs/libfs.c: use 'spin_lock_nested' when taking 'd_lock' for dentry in simple_empty
  2019-11-30  2:02 [PATCH V2 0/3] fix potential infinite loop in debugfs_remove_recursive yu kuai
  2019-11-30  2:02 ` [PATCH V2 1/3] dcache: add a new enum type for 'dentry_d_lock_class' yu kuai
@ 2019-11-30  2:02 ` yu kuai
  2019-11-30  2:02 ` [PATCH 3/3] debugfs: fix potential infinite loop in debugfs_remove_recursive yu kuai
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: yu kuai @ 2019-11-30  2:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gregkh, rafael, viro, rostedt, oleg, mchehab+samsung, corbet,
	tytso, jmorris
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel, yukuai3, zhengbin13, yi.zhang,
	chenxiang66, xiexiuqi

simple_emtpty currently use 'spin_lock_nested' for 'child' to avoid
confusion for lockdep. However, it's not used for 'dentry'.

In that case, there will be a problem if the caller called 'simple_empty'
with a parent's 'd_lock' held:

spin_lock(&dentry->d_parent->d_lock)
    call simple_empty(dentry)
        spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock) --> lockdep will report this
            spin_lock_nested(child->d_lock, spin_lock_nested)
            spin_unlock(child_lock)
        spin_unlock($dentry->d_lock)
    return from simple_empty
spin_unlock(&dentry->d_patrent->d_lock)

So, use 'DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED' for 'dentry' and 'DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED_TWICE'
for child.

Signed-off-by: yu kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
---
 fs/libfs.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/libfs.c b/fs/libfs.c
index 1463b038ffc4..54a37444f7f9 100644
--- a/fs/libfs.c
+++ b/fs/libfs.c
@@ -336,9 +336,9 @@ int simple_empty(struct dentry *dentry)
 	struct dentry *child;
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
+	spin_lock_nested(&dentry->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED);
 	list_for_each_entry(child, &dentry->d_subdirs, d_child) {
-		spin_lock_nested(&child->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED);
+		spin_lock_nested(&child->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED_TWICE);
 		if (simple_positive(child)) {
 			spin_unlock(&child->d_lock);
 			goto out;
-- 
2.17.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] debugfs: fix potential infinite loop in debugfs_remove_recursive
  2019-11-30  2:02 [PATCH V2 0/3] fix potential infinite loop in debugfs_remove_recursive yu kuai
  2019-11-30  2:02 ` [PATCH V2 1/3] dcache: add a new enum type for 'dentry_d_lock_class' yu kuai
  2019-11-30  2:02 ` [PATCH 2/3] fs/libfs.c: use 'spin_lock_nested' when taking 'd_lock' for dentry in simple_empty yu kuai
@ 2019-11-30  2:02 ` yu kuai
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: yu kuai @ 2019-11-30  2:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gregkh, rafael, viro, rostedt, oleg, mchehab+samsung, corbet,
	tytso, jmorris
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel, yukuai3, zhengbin13, yi.zhang,
	chenxiang66, xiexiuqi

debugfs_remove_recursive uses list_empty to judge weather a dentry has
any subdentry or not. This can lead to infinite loop when any subdir is
in use.

The problem was discoverd by the following steps in the console.
1. use debugfs_create_dir to create a dir and multiple subdirs(insmod);
2. cd to the subdir with depth not less than 2;
3. call debugfs_remove_recursive(rmmod).

After removing the subdir, the infinite loop is triggered because
debugfs_remove_recursive uses list_empty to judge if the current dir
doesn't have any subdentry. However list_empty can't skip the subdentry
that is not simple_positive(simple_positive() will return false).

Fix the problem by using simple_empty instead of list_empty.

Fixes: 776164c1faac ('debugfs: debugfs_remove_recursive() must not rely
on list_empty(d_subdirs)')
Reported-by: chenxiang66@hisilicon.com

Signed-off-by: yu kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
---
 fs/debugfs/inode.c | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/debugfs/inode.c b/fs/debugfs/inode.c
index 7b975dbb2bb4..d5ef7a0a4410 100644
--- a/fs/debugfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/debugfs/inode.c
@@ -773,8 +773,11 @@ void debugfs_remove_recursive(struct dentry *dentry)
 		if (!simple_positive(child))
 			continue;
 
-		/* perhaps simple_empty(child) makes more sense */
-		if (!list_empty(&child->d_subdirs)) {
+		/*
+		 * use simple_empty to prevent infinite loop when any
+		 * subdentry of child is in use
+		 */
+		if (!simple_empty(child)) {
 			spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock);
 			inode_unlock(d_inode(parent));
 			parent = child;
-- 
2.17.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] dcache: add a new enum type for 'dentry_d_lock_class'
  2019-11-30  2:02 ` [PATCH V2 1/3] dcache: add a new enum type for 'dentry_d_lock_class' yu kuai
@ 2019-11-30  3:43   ` Matthew Wilcox
  2019-11-30  7:53     ` yukuai (C)
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Wilcox @ 2019-11-30  3:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: yu kuai
  Cc: gregkh, rafael, viro, rostedt, oleg, mchehab+samsung, corbet,
	tytso, jmorris, linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel, zhengbin13,
	yi.zhang, chenxiang66, xiexiuqi

On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 10:02:23AM +0800, yu kuai wrote:
> However, a single 'DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED' may not be enough if more than
> two dentry are involed. So, add in 'DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED_TWICE'.

No.  These need meaningful names.  Indeed, I think D_LOCK_NESTED is
a terrible name.

Looking at the calls:

$ git grep -n nested.*d_lock fs
fs/autofs/expire.c:82:          spin_lock_nested(&child->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED);
fs/dcache.c:619:                spin_lock_nested(&dentry->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED);
fs/dcache.c:1086:       spin_lock_nested(&dentry->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED);
fs/dcache.c:1303:               spin_lock_nested(&dentry->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED);
fs/dcache.c:2822:               spin_lock_nested(&old_parent->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED);
fs/dcache.c:2827:                       spin_lock_nested(&target->d_parent->d_lock,
fs/dcache.c:2830:       spin_lock_nested(&dentry->d_lock, 2);
fs/dcache.c:2831:       spin_lock_nested(&target->d_lock, 3);
fs/dcache.c:3121:       spin_lock_nested(&dentry->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED);
fs/libfs.c:112:                 spin_lock_nested(&d->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED);
fs/libfs.c:341:         spin_lock_nested(&child->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED);
fs/notify/fsnotify.c:129:                       spin_lock_nested(&child->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED);

Most of these would be well-expressed by DENTRY_D_LOCK_CHILD.

The exception is __d_move() where I think we should actually name the
different lock classes instead of using a bare '2' and '3'.  Something
like this, perhaps:

diff --git a/fs/autofs/expire.c b/fs/autofs/expire.c
index 2866fabf497f..f604175243eb 100644
--- a/fs/autofs/expire.c
+++ b/fs/autofs/expire.c
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ static struct dentry *positive_after(struct dentry *p, struct dentry *child)
 		child = list_first_entry(&p->d_subdirs, struct dentry, d_child);
 
 	list_for_each_entry_from(child, &p->d_subdirs, d_child) {
-		spin_lock_nested(&child->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED);
+		spin_lock_nested(&child->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_CHILD);
 		if (simple_positive(child)) {
 			dget_dlock(child);
 			spin_unlock(&child->d_lock);
diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c
index e88cf0554e65..c73b7d7bc785 100644
--- a/fs/dcache.c
+++ b/fs/dcache.c
@@ -616,7 +616,7 @@ static struct dentry *__lock_parent(struct dentry *dentry)
 	}
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 	if (parent != dentry)
-		spin_lock_nested(&dentry->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED);
+		spin_lock_nested(&dentry->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_CHILD);
 	else
 		parent = NULL;
 	return parent;
@@ -1083,7 +1083,7 @@ static bool shrink_lock_dentry(struct dentry *dentry)
 		spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
 		goto out;
 	}
-	spin_lock_nested(&dentry->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED);
+	spin_lock_nested(&dentry->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_CHILD);
 	if (likely(!dentry->d_lockref.count))
 		return true;
 	spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock);
@@ -1300,7 +1300,7 @@ static void d_walk(struct dentry *parent, void *data,
 		if (unlikely(dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_DENTRY_CURSOR))
 			continue;
 
-		spin_lock_nested(&dentry->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED);
+		spin_lock_nested(&dentry->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_CHILD);
 
 		ret = enter(data, dentry);
 		switch (ret) {
@@ -2819,16 +2819,16 @@ static void __d_move(struct dentry *dentry, struct dentry *target,
 	} else if (!p) {
 		/* target is not a descendent of dentry->d_parent */
 		spin_lock(&target->d_parent->d_lock);
-		spin_lock_nested(&old_parent->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED);
+		spin_lock_nested(&old_parent->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_PARENT_2);
 	} else {
 		BUG_ON(p == dentry);
 		spin_lock(&old_parent->d_lock);
 		if (p != target)
 			spin_lock_nested(&target->d_parent->d_lock,
-					DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED);
+					DENTRY_D_LOCK_PARENT_2);
 	}
-	spin_lock_nested(&dentry->d_lock, 2);
-	spin_lock_nested(&target->d_lock, 3);
+	spin_lock_nested(&dentry->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_CHILD);
+	spin_lock_nested(&target->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_CHILD_2);
 
 	if (unlikely(d_in_lookup(target))) {
 		dir = target->d_parent->d_inode;
@@ -2837,7 +2837,7 @@ static void __d_move(struct dentry *dentry, struct dentry *target,
 	}
 
 	write_seqcount_begin(&dentry->d_seq);
-	write_seqcount_begin_nested(&target->d_seq, DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED);
+	write_seqcount_begin_nested(&target->d_seq, DENTRY_D_LOCK_CHILD);
 
 	/* unhash both */
 	if (!d_unhashed(dentry))
@@ -3118,7 +3118,7 @@ void d_tmpfile(struct dentry *dentry, struct inode *inode)
 		!hlist_unhashed(&dentry->d_u.d_alias) ||
 		!d_unlinked(dentry));
 	spin_lock(&dentry->d_parent->d_lock);
-	spin_lock_nested(&dentry->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED);
+	spin_lock_nested(&dentry->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_CHILD);
 	dentry->d_name.len = sprintf(dentry->d_iname, "#%llu",
 				(unsigned long long)inode->i_ino);
 	spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
diff --git a/fs/libfs.c b/fs/libfs.c
index 1463b038ffc4..c68dedbf4ad2 100644
--- a/fs/libfs.c
+++ b/fs/libfs.c
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ static struct dentry *scan_positives(struct dentry *cursor,
 		if (d->d_flags & DCACHE_DENTRY_CURSOR)
 			continue;
 		if (simple_positive(d) && !--count) {
-			spin_lock_nested(&d->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED);
+			spin_lock_nested(&d->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_CHILD);
 			if (simple_positive(d))
 				found = dget_dlock(d);
 			spin_unlock(&d->d_lock);
@@ -336,9 +336,9 @@ int simple_empty(struct dentry *dentry)
 	struct dentry *child;
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
+	spin_lock_nested(&dentry->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_PARENT_2);
 	list_for_each_entry(child, &dentry->d_subdirs, d_child) {
-		spin_lock_nested(&child->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED);
+		spin_lock_nested(&child->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_CHILD_2);
 		if (simple_positive(child)) {
 			spin_unlock(&child->d_lock);
 			goto out;
diff --git a/fs/notify/fsnotify.c b/fs/notify/fsnotify.c
index 2ecef6155fc0..23492f2e4915 100644
--- a/fs/notify/fsnotify.c
+++ b/fs/notify/fsnotify.c
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ void __fsnotify_update_child_dentry_flags(struct inode *inode)
 			if (!child->d_inode)
 				continue;
 
-			spin_lock_nested(&child->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED);
+			spin_lock_nested(&child->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_CHILD);
 			if (watched)
 				child->d_flags |= DCACHE_FSNOTIFY_PARENT_WATCHED;
 			else
diff --git a/include/linux/dcache.h b/include/linux/dcache.h
index 10090f11ab95..6a497c63bd38 100644
--- a/include/linux/dcache.h
+++ b/include/linux/dcache.h
@@ -121,15 +121,20 @@ struct dentry {
 } __randomize_layout;
 
 /*
- * dentry->d_lock spinlock nesting subclasses:
+ * dentry->d_lock spinlock nesting subclasses.  Always taken in increasing
+ * order although some subclasses may be skipped.
  *
  * 0: normal
- * 1: nested
+ * 1: either a descendent of "normal" or a cousin.
+ * 2: child of the "normal" dentry
+ * 3: child of the "parent2" dentry
  */
 enum dentry_d_lock_class
 {
-	DENTRY_D_LOCK_NORMAL, /* implicitly used by plain spin_lock() APIs. */
-	DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED
+	DENTRY_D_LOCK_NORMAL,   /* implicitly used by plain spin_lock() APIs */
+	DENTRY_D_LOCK_PARENT_2, /* not an ancestor of parent */
+	DENTRY_D_LOCK_CHILD,    /* nests under parent's lock */
+	DENTRY_D_LOCK_CHILD_2,  /* PARENT_2's child */
 };
 
 struct dentry_operations {

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] dcache: add a new enum type for 'dentry_d_lock_class'
  2019-11-30  3:43   ` Matthew Wilcox
@ 2019-11-30  7:53     ` yukuai (C)
  2019-11-30 19:36       ` Matthew Wilcox
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: yukuai (C) @ 2019-11-30  7:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Matthew Wilcox
  Cc: gregkh, rafael, viro, rostedt, oleg, mchehab+samsung, corbet,
	tytso, jmorris, linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel, zhengbin13,
	yi.zhang, chenxiang66, xiexiuqi



On 2019/11/30 11:43, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 10:02:23AM +0800, yu kuai wrote:
>> However, a single 'DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED' may not be enough if more than
>> two dentry are involed. So, add in 'DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED_TWICE'.
> 
> No.  These need meaningful names.  Indeed, I think D_LOCK_NESTED is
> a terrible name.
> 
> Looking at the calls:
> 
> $ git grep -n nested.*d_lock fs
> fs/autofs/expire.c:82:          spin_lock_nested(&child->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED);
> fs/dcache.c:619:                spin_lock_nested(&dentry->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED);
> fs/dcache.c:1086:       spin_lock_nested(&dentry->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED);
> fs/dcache.c:1303:               spin_lock_nested(&dentry->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED);
> fs/dcache.c:2822:               spin_lock_nested(&old_parent->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED);
> fs/dcache.c:2827:                       spin_lock_nested(&target->d_parent->d_lock,
> fs/dcache.c:2830:       spin_lock_nested(&dentry->d_lock, 2);
> fs/dcache.c:2831:       spin_lock_nested(&target->d_lock, 3);
> fs/dcache.c:3121:       spin_lock_nested(&dentry->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED);
> fs/libfs.c:112:                 spin_lock_nested(&d->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED);
> fs/libfs.c:341:         spin_lock_nested(&child->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED);
> fs/notify/fsnotify.c:129:                       spin_lock_nested(&child->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED);
> 
> Most of these would be well-expressed by DENTRY_D_LOCK_CHILD.
> 
> The exception is __d_move() where I think we should actually name the
> different lock classes instead of using a bare '2' and '3'.  Something
> like this, perhaps:
> 
Thanks for looking into this, do you mind if I replace your patch with 
the first two patches in the patchset?

Yu Kuai


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] dcache: add a new enum type for 'dentry_d_lock_class'
  2019-11-30  7:53     ` yukuai (C)
@ 2019-11-30 19:36       ` Matthew Wilcox
  2019-12-08 19:11         ` Al Viro
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Wilcox @ 2019-11-30 19:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: yukuai (C)
  Cc: gregkh, rafael, viro, rostedt, oleg, mchehab+samsung, corbet,
	tytso, jmorris, linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel, zhengbin13,
	yi.zhang, chenxiang66, xiexiuqi

On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 03:53:10PM +0800, yukuai (C) wrote:
> On 2019/11/30 11:43, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 10:02:23AM +0800, yu kuai wrote:
> > > However, a single 'DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED' may not be enough if more than
> > > two dentry are involed. So, add in 'DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED_TWICE'.
> > 
> > No.  These need meaningful names.  Indeed, I think D_LOCK_NESTED is
> > a terrible name.
> > 
> > The exception is __d_move() where I think we should actually name the
> > different lock classes instead of using a bare '2' and '3'.  Something
> > like this, perhaps:
> 
> Thanks for looking into this, do you mind if I replace your patch with the
> first two patches in the patchset?

That's fine by me, but I think we should wait for Al to give his approval
before submitting a new version.

I'm also not entirely content with the explanation I wrote last night.
Maybe this instead ...

 /*
- * dentry->d_lock spinlock nesting subclasses:
+ * dentry->d_lock spinlock nesting subclasses.  Always taken in increasing
+ * order although some subclasses may be skipped.  If one dentry is the
+ * ancestor of another, then the ancestor's d_lock is taken before the
+ * descendent.  If NORMAL and PARENT_2 do not have a hierarchical relationship
+ * then you must hold the s_vfs_rename_mutex to prevent another thread taking
+ * the locks in the opposite order, or NORMAL and PARENT_2 becoming
+ * hierarchical through a rename operation.
  *
  * 0: normal
- * 1: nested
+ * 1: either a descendent of "normal" or a cousin.
+ * 2: child of the "normal" dentry
+ * 3: child of the "parent2" dentry
  */
 enum dentry_d_lock_class
 {
-       DENTRY_D_LOCK_NORMAL, /* implicitly used by plain spin_lock() APIs. */
-       DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED
+       DENTRY_D_LOCK_NORMAL,   /* implicitly used by plain spin_lock() APIs */
+       DENTRY_D_LOCK_PARENT_2, /* not an ancestor of normal */
+       DENTRY_D_LOCK_CHILD,    /* nests under parent's lock */
+       DENTRY_D_LOCK_CHILD_2,  /* PARENT_2's child */
 };


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] dcache: add a new enum type for 'dentry_d_lock_class'
  2019-11-30 19:36       ` Matthew Wilcox
@ 2019-12-08 19:11         ` Al Viro
  2019-12-11 15:55           ` David Hildenbrand
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Al Viro @ 2019-12-08 19:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Matthew Wilcox
  Cc: yukuai (C),
	gregkh, rafael, rostedt, oleg, mchehab+samsung, corbet, tytso,
	jmorris, linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel, zhengbin13, yi.zhang,
	chenxiang66, xiexiuqi

On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 11:36:15AM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 03:53:10PM +0800, yukuai (C) wrote:
> > On 2019/11/30 11:43, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 10:02:23AM +0800, yu kuai wrote:
> > > > However, a single 'DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED' may not be enough if more than
> > > > two dentry are involed. So, add in 'DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED_TWICE'.
> > > 
> > > No.  These need meaningful names.  Indeed, I think D_LOCK_NESTED is
> > > a terrible name.
> > > 
> > > The exception is __d_move() where I think we should actually name the
> > > different lock classes instead of using a bare '2' and '3'.  Something
> > > like this, perhaps:
> > 
> > Thanks for looking into this, do you mind if I replace your patch with the
> > first two patches in the patchset?
> 
> That's fine by me, but I think we should wait for Al to give his approval
> before submitting a new version.

IMO this is a wrong approach.  It's papering over a confused code in
debugfs recursive removal and it would be better to get rid of _that_,
rather than try and slap bandaids on it.

I suspect that the following would be a better way to deal with it; it adds
a new primitive and converts debugfs and tracefs to that.  There are
followups converting other such places, still not finished.

commit 7e9c8a08889bf42bbe64e80e456d2eca824e5db2
Author: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Date:   Mon Nov 18 09:43:10 2019 -0500

    simple_recursive_removal(): kernel-side rm -rf for ramfs-style filesystems
    
    two requirements: no file creations in IS_DEADDIR and no cross-directory
    renames whatsoever.
    
    Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

diff --git a/fs/debugfs/inode.c b/fs/debugfs/inode.c
index 042b688ed124..da936c54d879 100644
--- a/fs/debugfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/debugfs/inode.c
@@ -309,7 +309,10 @@ static struct dentry *start_creating(const char *name, struct dentry *parent)
 		parent = debugfs_mount->mnt_root;
 
 	inode_lock(d_inode(parent));
-	dentry = lookup_one_len(name, parent, strlen(name));
+	if (unlikely(IS_DEADDIR(d_inode(parent))))
+		dentry = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
+	else
+		dentry = lookup_one_len(name, parent, strlen(name));
 	if (!IS_ERR(dentry) && d_really_is_positive(dentry)) {
 		if (d_is_dir(dentry))
 			pr_err("Directory '%s' with parent '%s' already present!\n",
@@ -657,62 +660,15 @@ static void __debugfs_file_removed(struct dentry *dentry)
 		wait_for_completion(&fsd->active_users_drained);
 }
 
-static int __debugfs_remove(struct dentry *dentry, struct dentry *parent)
-{
-	int ret = 0;
-
-	if (simple_positive(dentry)) {
-		dget(dentry);
-		if (d_is_dir(dentry)) {
-			ret = simple_rmdir(d_inode(parent), dentry);
-			if (!ret)
-				fsnotify_rmdir(d_inode(parent), dentry);
-		} else {
-			simple_unlink(d_inode(parent), dentry);
-			fsnotify_unlink(d_inode(parent), dentry);
-		}
-		if (!ret)
-			d_delete(dentry);
-		if (d_is_reg(dentry))
-			__debugfs_file_removed(dentry);
-		dput(dentry);
-	}
-	return ret;
-}
-
-/**
- * debugfs_remove - removes a file or directory from the debugfs filesystem
- * @dentry: a pointer to a the dentry of the file or directory to be
- *          removed.  If this parameter is NULL or an error value, nothing
- *          will be done.
- *
- * This function removes a file or directory in debugfs that was previously
- * created with a call to another debugfs function (like
- * debugfs_create_file() or variants thereof.)
- *
- * This function is required to be called in order for the file to be
- * removed, no automatic cleanup of files will happen when a module is
- * removed, you are responsible here.
- */
-void debugfs_remove(struct dentry *dentry)
+static void remove_one(struct dentry *victim)
 {
-	struct dentry *parent;
-	int ret;
-
-	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dentry))
-		return;
-
-	parent = dentry->d_parent;
-	inode_lock(d_inode(parent));
-	ret = __debugfs_remove(dentry, parent);
-	inode_unlock(d_inode(parent));
-	if (!ret)
-		simple_release_fs(&debugfs_mount, &debugfs_mount_count);
+        if (d_is_reg(victim))
+		__debugfs_file_removed(victim);
+	simple_release_fs(&debugfs_mount, &debugfs_mount_count);
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(debugfs_remove);
 
 /**
- * debugfs_remove_recursive - recursively removes a directory
+ * debugfs_remove - recursively removes a directory
  * @dentry: a pointer to a the dentry of the directory to be removed.  If this
  *          parameter is NULL or an error value, nothing will be done.
  *
@@ -724,65 +680,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(debugfs_remove);
  * removed, no automatic cleanup of files will happen when a module is
  * removed, you are responsible here.
  */
-void debugfs_remove_recursive(struct dentry *dentry)
+void debugfs_remove(struct dentry *dentry)
 {
-	struct dentry *child, *parent;
-
 	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dentry))
 		return;
 
-	parent = dentry;
- down:
-	inode_lock(d_inode(parent));
- loop:
-	/*
-	 * The parent->d_subdirs is protected by the d_lock. Outside that
-	 * lock, the child can be unlinked and set to be freed which can
-	 * use the d_u.d_child as the rcu head and corrupt this list.
-	 */
-	spin_lock(&parent->d_lock);
-	list_for_each_entry(child, &parent->d_subdirs, d_child) {
-		if (!simple_positive(child))
-			continue;
-
-		/* perhaps simple_empty(child) makes more sense */
-		if (!list_empty(&child->d_subdirs)) {
-			spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock);
-			inode_unlock(d_inode(parent));
-			parent = child;
-			goto down;
-		}
-
-		spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock);
-
-		if (!__debugfs_remove(child, parent))
-			simple_release_fs(&debugfs_mount, &debugfs_mount_count);
-
-		/*
-		 * The parent->d_lock protects agaist child from unlinking
-		 * from d_subdirs. When releasing the parent->d_lock we can
-		 * no longer trust that the next pointer is valid.
-		 * Restart the loop. We'll skip this one with the
-		 * simple_positive() check.
-		 */
-		goto loop;
-	}
-	spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock);
-
-	inode_unlock(d_inode(parent));
-	child = parent;
-	parent = parent->d_parent;
-	inode_lock(d_inode(parent));
-
-	if (child != dentry)
-		/* go up */
-		goto loop;
-
-	if (!__debugfs_remove(child, parent))
-		simple_release_fs(&debugfs_mount, &debugfs_mount_count);
-	inode_unlock(d_inode(parent));
+	simple_pin_fs(&debug_fs_type, &debugfs_mount, &debugfs_mount_count);
+	simple_recursive_removal(dentry, remove_one);
+	simple_release_fs(&debugfs_mount, &debugfs_mount_count);
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(debugfs_remove_recursive);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(debugfs_remove);
 
 /**
  * debugfs_rename - rename a file/directory in the debugfs filesystem
diff --git a/fs/libfs.c b/fs/libfs.c
index 540611b99b9a..b67003a948ed 100644
--- a/fs/libfs.c
+++ b/fs/libfs.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
 #include <linux/buffer_head.h> /* sync_mapping_buffers */
 #include <linux/fs_context.h>
 #include <linux/pseudo_fs.h>
+#include <linux/fsnotify.h>
 
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
 
@@ -239,6 +240,75 @@ const struct inode_operations simple_dir_inode_operations = {
 };
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(simple_dir_inode_operations);
 
+static struct dentry *find_next_child(struct dentry *parent, struct dentry *prev)
+{
+	struct dentry *child = NULL;
+	struct list_head *p = prev ? &prev->d_child : &parent->d_subdirs;
+
+	spin_lock(&parent->d_lock);
+	while ((p = p->next) != &parent->d_subdirs) {
+		struct dentry *d = container_of(p, struct dentry, d_child);
+		if (simple_positive(d)) {
+			spin_lock_nested(&d->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED);
+			if (simple_positive(d))
+				child = dget_dlock(d);
+			spin_unlock(&d->d_lock);
+			if (likely(child))
+				break;
+		}
+	}
+	spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock);
+	dput(prev);
+	return child;
+}
+
+void simple_recursive_removal(struct dentry *dentry,
+                              void (*callback)(struct dentry *))
+{
+	struct dentry *this = dentry;
+	while (true) {
+		struct dentry *victim = NULL, *child;
+		struct inode *inode = this->d_inode;
+
+		inode_lock(inode);
+		if (d_is_dir(this))
+			inode->i_flags |= S_DEAD;
+		while ((child = find_next_child(this, victim)) == NULL) {
+			// kill and ascend
+			// update metadata while it's still locked
+			inode->i_ctime = current_time(inode);
+			clear_nlink(inode);
+			inode_unlock(inode);
+			victim = this;
+			this = this->d_parent;
+			inode = this->d_inode;
+			inode_lock(inode);
+			if (simple_positive(victim)) {
+				d_invalidate(victim);	// avoid lost mounts
+				if (d_is_dir(victim))
+					fsnotify_rmdir(inode, victim);
+				else
+					fsnotify_unlink(inode, victim);
+				if (callback)
+					callback(victim);
+				dput(victim);		// unpin it
+			}
+			if (victim == dentry) {
+				inode->i_ctime = inode->i_mtime =
+					current_time(inode);
+				if (d_is_dir(dentry))
+					drop_nlink(inode);
+				inode_unlock(inode);
+				dput(dentry);
+				return;
+			}
+		}
+		inode_unlock(inode);
+		this = child;
+	}
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(simple_recursive_removal);
+
 static const struct super_operations simple_super_operations = {
 	.statfs		= simple_statfs,
 };
diff --git a/fs/tracefs/inode.c b/fs/tracefs/inode.c
index eeeae0475da9..2a16c0eb97e4 100644
--- a/fs/tracefs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/tracefs/inode.c
@@ -329,7 +329,10 @@ static struct dentry *start_creating(const char *name, struct dentry *parent)
 		parent = tracefs_mount->mnt_root;
 
 	inode_lock(parent->d_inode);
-	dentry = lookup_one_len(name, parent, strlen(name));
+	if (unlikely(IS_DEADDIR(parent->d_inode)))
+		dentry = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
+	else
+		dentry = lookup_one_len(name, parent, strlen(name));
 	if (!IS_ERR(dentry) && dentry->d_inode) {
 		dput(dentry);
 		dentry = ERR_PTR(-EEXIST);
@@ -495,122 +498,27 @@ __init struct dentry *tracefs_create_instance_dir(const char *name,
 	return dentry;
 }
 
-static int __tracefs_remove(struct dentry *dentry, struct dentry *parent)
+static void remove_one(struct dentry *victim)
 {
-	int ret = 0;
-
-	if (simple_positive(dentry)) {
-		if (dentry->d_inode) {
-			dget(dentry);
-			switch (dentry->d_inode->i_mode & S_IFMT) {
-			case S_IFDIR:
-				ret = simple_rmdir(parent->d_inode, dentry);
-				if (!ret)
-					fsnotify_rmdir(parent->d_inode, dentry);
-				break;
-			default:
-				simple_unlink(parent->d_inode, dentry);
-				fsnotify_unlink(parent->d_inode, dentry);
-				break;
-			}
-			if (!ret)
-				d_delete(dentry);
-			dput(dentry);
-		}
-	}
-	return ret;
-}
-
-/**
- * tracefs_remove - removes a file or directory from the tracefs filesystem
- * @dentry: a pointer to a the dentry of the file or directory to be
- *          removed.
- *
- * This function removes a file or directory in tracefs that was previously
- * created with a call to another tracefs function (like
- * tracefs_create_file() or variants thereof.)
- */
-void tracefs_remove(struct dentry *dentry)
-{
-	struct dentry *parent;
-	int ret;
-
-	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dentry))
-		return;
-
-	parent = dentry->d_parent;
-	inode_lock(parent->d_inode);
-	ret = __tracefs_remove(dentry, parent);
-	inode_unlock(parent->d_inode);
-	if (!ret)
-		simple_release_fs(&tracefs_mount, &tracefs_mount_count);
+	simple_release_fs(&tracefs_mount, &tracefs_mount_count);
 }
 
 /**
- * tracefs_remove_recursive - recursively removes a directory
+ * tracefs_remove - recursively removes a directory
  * @dentry: a pointer to a the dentry of the directory to be removed.
  *
  * This function recursively removes a directory tree in tracefs that
  * was previously created with a call to another tracefs function
  * (like tracefs_create_file() or variants thereof.)
  */
-void tracefs_remove_recursive(struct dentry *dentry)
+void tracefs_remove(struct dentry *dentry)
 {
-	struct dentry *child, *parent;
-
 	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dentry))
 		return;
 
-	parent = dentry;
- down:
-	inode_lock(parent->d_inode);
- loop:
-	/*
-	 * The parent->d_subdirs is protected by the d_lock. Outside that
-	 * lock, the child can be unlinked and set to be freed which can
-	 * use the d_u.d_child as the rcu head and corrupt this list.
-	 */
-	spin_lock(&parent->d_lock);
-	list_for_each_entry(child, &parent->d_subdirs, d_child) {
-		if (!simple_positive(child))
-			continue;
-
-		/* perhaps simple_empty(child) makes more sense */
-		if (!list_empty(&child->d_subdirs)) {
-			spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock);
-			inode_unlock(parent->d_inode);
-			parent = child;
-			goto down;
-		}
-
-		spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock);
-
-		if (!__tracefs_remove(child, parent))
-			simple_release_fs(&tracefs_mount, &tracefs_mount_count);
-
-		/*
-		 * The parent->d_lock protects agaist child from unlinking
-		 * from d_subdirs. When releasing the parent->d_lock we can
-		 * no longer trust that the next pointer is valid.
-		 * Restart the loop. We'll skip this one with the
-		 * simple_positive() check.
-		 */
-		goto loop;
-	}
-	spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock);
-
-	inode_unlock(parent->d_inode);
-	child = parent;
-	parent = parent->d_parent;
-	inode_lock(parent->d_inode);
-
-	if (child != dentry)
-		/* go up */
-		goto loop;
-
-	if (!__tracefs_remove(child, parent))
-		simple_release_fs(&tracefs_mount, &tracefs_mount_count);
-	inode_unlock(parent->d_inode);
+	simple_pin_fs(&trace_fs_type, &tracefs_mount, &tracefs_mount_count);
+	simple_recursive_removal(dentry, remove_one);
+	simple_release_fs(&tracefs_mount, &tracefs_mount_count);
 }
 
 /**
diff --git a/include/linux/debugfs.h b/include/linux/debugfs.h
index 58424eb3b329..0a817d763f0f 100644
--- a/include/linux/debugfs.h
+++ b/include/linux/debugfs.h
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ struct dentry *debugfs_create_automount(const char *name,
 					void *data);
 
 void debugfs_remove(struct dentry *dentry);
-void debugfs_remove_recursive(struct dentry *dentry);
+#define debugfs_remove_recursive debugfs_remove
 
 const struct file_operations *debugfs_real_fops(const struct file *filp);
 
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index 997a530ff4e9..73ffc8654987 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -3242,6 +3242,8 @@ extern int simple_unlink(struct inode *, struct dentry *);
 extern int simple_rmdir(struct inode *, struct dentry *);
 extern int simple_rename(struct inode *, struct dentry *,
 			 struct inode *, struct dentry *, unsigned int);
+extern void simple_recursive_removal(struct dentry *,
+                              void (*callback)(struct dentry *));
 extern int noop_fsync(struct file *, loff_t, loff_t, int);
 extern int noop_set_page_dirty(struct page *page);
 extern void noop_invalidatepage(struct page *page, unsigned int offset,
diff --git a/include/linux/tracefs.h b/include/linux/tracefs.h
index 88d279c1b863..99912445974c 100644
--- a/include/linux/tracefs.h
+++ b/include/linux/tracefs.h
@@ -28,7 +28,6 @@ struct dentry *tracefs_create_file(const char *name, umode_t mode,
 struct dentry *tracefs_create_dir(const char *name, struct dentry *parent);
 
 void tracefs_remove(struct dentry *dentry);
-void tracefs_remove_recursive(struct dentry *dentry);
 
 struct dentry *tracefs_create_instance_dir(const char *name, struct dentry *parent,
 					   int (*mkdir)(const char *name),
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
index 563e80f9006a..88d94dc3ed37 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
@@ -8366,7 +8366,7 @@ struct trace_array *trace_array_create(const char *name)
 
 	ret = event_trace_add_tracer(tr->dir, tr);
 	if (ret) {
-		tracefs_remove_recursive(tr->dir);
+		tracefs_remove(tr->dir);
 		goto out_free_tr;
 	}
 
@@ -8422,7 +8422,7 @@ static int __remove_instance(struct trace_array *tr)
 	event_trace_del_tracer(tr);
 	ftrace_clear_pids(tr);
 	ftrace_destroy_function_files(tr);
-	tracefs_remove_recursive(tr->dir);
+	tracefs_remove(tr->dir);
 	free_trace_buffers(tr);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < tr->nr_topts; i++) {
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
index 648930823b57..25bb3e8fb170 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
@@ -696,7 +696,7 @@ static void remove_subsystem(struct trace_subsystem_dir *dir)
 		return;
 
 	if (!--dir->nr_events) {
-		tracefs_remove_recursive(dir->entry);
+		tracefs_remove(dir->entry);
 		list_del(&dir->list);
 		__put_system_dir(dir);
 	}
@@ -715,7 +715,7 @@ static void remove_event_file_dir(struct trace_event_file *file)
 		}
 		spin_unlock(&dir->d_lock);
 
-		tracefs_remove_recursive(dir);
+		tracefs_remove(dir);
 	}
 
 	list_del(&file->list);
@@ -3032,7 +3032,7 @@ int event_trace_del_tracer(struct trace_array *tr)
 
 	down_write(&trace_event_sem);
 	__trace_remove_event_dirs(tr);
-	tracefs_remove_recursive(tr->event_dir);
+	tracefs_remove(tr->event_dir);
 	up_write(&trace_event_sem);
 
 	tr->event_dir = NULL;
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c b/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c
index fa95139445b2..fa45a031848c 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c
@@ -551,7 +551,7 @@ static int init_tracefs(void)
 	return 0;
 
  err:
-	tracefs_remove_recursive(top_dir);
+	tracefs_remove(top_dir);
 	return -ENOMEM;
 }
 

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] dcache: add a new enum type for 'dentry_d_lock_class'
  2019-12-08 19:11         ` Al Viro
@ 2019-12-11 15:55           ` David Hildenbrand
  2019-12-11 18:46             ` Al Viro
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: David Hildenbrand @ 2019-12-11 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Al Viro, Matthew Wilcox
  Cc: yukuai (C),
	gregkh, rafael, rostedt, oleg, mchehab+samsung, corbet, tytso,
	jmorris, linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel, zhengbin13, yi.zhang,
	chenxiang66, xiexiuqi

On 08.12.19 20:11, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 11:36:15AM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 03:53:10PM +0800, yukuai (C) wrote:
>>> On 2019/11/30 11:43, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 10:02:23AM +0800, yu kuai wrote:
>>>>> However, a single 'DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED' may not be enough if more than
>>>>> two dentry are involed. So, add in 'DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED_TWICE'.
>>>>
>>>> No.  These need meaningful names.  Indeed, I think D_LOCK_NESTED is
>>>> a terrible name.
>>>>
>>>> The exception is __d_move() where I think we should actually name the
>>>> different lock classes instead of using a bare '2' and '3'.  Something
>>>> like this, perhaps:
>>>
>>> Thanks for looking into this, do you mind if I replace your patch with the
>>> first two patches in the patchset?
>>
>> That's fine by me, but I think we should wait for Al to give his approval
>> before submitting a new version.
> 
> IMO this is a wrong approach.  It's papering over a confused code in
> debugfs recursive removal and it would be better to get rid of _that_,
> rather than try and slap bandaids on it.
> 
> I suspect that the following would be a better way to deal with it; it adds
> a new primitive and converts debugfs and tracefs to that.  There are
> followups converting other such places, still not finished.
> 
> commit 7e9c8a08889bf42bbe64e80e456d2eca824e5db2
> Author: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> Date:   Mon Nov 18 09:43:10 2019 -0500
> 
>     simple_recursive_removal(): kernel-side rm -rf for ramfs-style filesystems
>     
>     two requirements: no file creations in IS_DEADDIR and no cross-directory
>     renames whatsoever.
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> 
> diff --git a/fs/debugfs/inode.c b/fs/debugfs/inode.c
> index 042b688ed124..da936c54d879 100644
> --- a/fs/debugfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/debugfs/inode.c
> @@ -309,7 +309,10 @@ static struct dentry *start_creating(const char *name, struct dentry *parent)
>  		parent = debugfs_mount->mnt_root;
>  
>  	inode_lock(d_inode(parent));
> -	dentry = lookup_one_len(name, parent, strlen(name));
> +	if (unlikely(IS_DEADDIR(d_inode(parent))))
> +		dentry = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
> +	else
> +		dentry = lookup_one_len(name, parent, strlen(name));
>  	if (!IS_ERR(dentry) && d_really_is_positive(dentry)) {
>  		if (d_is_dir(dentry))
>  			pr_err("Directory '%s' with parent '%s' already present!\n",
> @@ -657,62 +660,15 @@ static void __debugfs_file_removed(struct dentry *dentry)
>  		wait_for_completion(&fsd->active_users_drained);
>  }
>  
> -static int __debugfs_remove(struct dentry *dentry, struct dentry *parent)
> -{
> -	int ret = 0;
> -
> -	if (simple_positive(dentry)) {
> -		dget(dentry);
> -		if (d_is_dir(dentry)) {
> -			ret = simple_rmdir(d_inode(parent), dentry);
> -			if (!ret)
> -				fsnotify_rmdir(d_inode(parent), dentry);
> -		} else {
> -			simple_unlink(d_inode(parent), dentry);
> -			fsnotify_unlink(d_inode(parent), dentry);
> -		}
> -		if (!ret)
> -			d_delete(dentry);
> -		if (d_is_reg(dentry))
> -			__debugfs_file_removed(dentry);
> -		dput(dentry);
> -	}
> -	return ret;
> -}
> -
> -/**
> - * debugfs_remove - removes a file or directory from the debugfs filesystem
> - * @dentry: a pointer to a the dentry of the file or directory to be
> - *          removed.  If this parameter is NULL or an error value, nothing
> - *          will be done.
> - *
> - * This function removes a file or directory in debugfs that was previously
> - * created with a call to another debugfs function (like
> - * debugfs_create_file() or variants thereof.)
> - *
> - * This function is required to be called in order for the file to be
> - * removed, no automatic cleanup of files will happen when a module is
> - * removed, you are responsible here.
> - */
> -void debugfs_remove(struct dentry *dentry)
> +static void remove_one(struct dentry *victim)
>  {
> -	struct dentry *parent;
> -	int ret;
> -
> -	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dentry))
> -		return;
> -
> -	parent = dentry->d_parent;
> -	inode_lock(d_inode(parent));
> -	ret = __debugfs_remove(dentry, parent);
> -	inode_unlock(d_inode(parent));
> -	if (!ret)
> -		simple_release_fs(&debugfs_mount, &debugfs_mount_count);
> +        if (d_is_reg(victim))
> +		__debugfs_file_removed(victim);
> +	simple_release_fs(&debugfs_mount, &debugfs_mount_count);
>  }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(debugfs_remove);
>  
>  /**
> - * debugfs_remove_recursive - recursively removes a directory
> + * debugfs_remove - recursively removes a directory
>   * @dentry: a pointer to a the dentry of the directory to be removed.  If this
>   *          parameter is NULL or an error value, nothing will be done.
>   *
> @@ -724,65 +680,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(debugfs_remove);
>   * removed, no automatic cleanup of files will happen when a module is
>   * removed, you are responsible here.
>   */
> -void debugfs_remove_recursive(struct dentry *dentry)
> +void debugfs_remove(struct dentry *dentry)
>  {
> -	struct dentry *child, *parent;
> -
>  	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dentry))
>  		return;
>  
> -	parent = dentry;
> - down:
> -	inode_lock(d_inode(parent));
> - loop:
> -	/*
> -	 * The parent->d_subdirs is protected by the d_lock. Outside that
> -	 * lock, the child can be unlinked and set to be freed which can
> -	 * use the d_u.d_child as the rcu head and corrupt this list.
> -	 */
> -	spin_lock(&parent->d_lock);
> -	list_for_each_entry(child, &parent->d_subdirs, d_child) {
> -		if (!simple_positive(child))
> -			continue;
> -
> -		/* perhaps simple_empty(child) makes more sense */
> -		if (!list_empty(&child->d_subdirs)) {
> -			spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock);
> -			inode_unlock(d_inode(parent));
> -			parent = child;
> -			goto down;
> -		}
> -
> -		spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock);
> -
> -		if (!__debugfs_remove(child, parent))
> -			simple_release_fs(&debugfs_mount, &debugfs_mount_count);
> -
> -		/*
> -		 * The parent->d_lock protects agaist child from unlinking
> -		 * from d_subdirs. When releasing the parent->d_lock we can
> -		 * no longer trust that the next pointer is valid.
> -		 * Restart the loop. We'll skip this one with the
> -		 * simple_positive() check.
> -		 */
> -		goto loop;
> -	}
> -	spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock);
> -
> -	inode_unlock(d_inode(parent));
> -	child = parent;
> -	parent = parent->d_parent;
> -	inode_lock(d_inode(parent));
> -
> -	if (child != dentry)
> -		/* go up */
> -		goto loop;
> -
> -	if (!__debugfs_remove(child, parent))
> -		simple_release_fs(&debugfs_mount, &debugfs_mount_count);
> -	inode_unlock(d_inode(parent));
> +	simple_pin_fs(&debug_fs_type, &debugfs_mount, &debugfs_mount_count);
> +	simple_recursive_removal(dentry, remove_one);
> +	simple_release_fs(&debugfs_mount, &debugfs_mount_count);
>  }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(debugfs_remove_recursive);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(debugfs_remove);
>  
>  /**
>   * debugfs_rename - rename a file/directory in the debugfs filesystem
> diff --git a/fs/libfs.c b/fs/libfs.c
> index 540611b99b9a..b67003a948ed 100644
> --- a/fs/libfs.c
> +++ b/fs/libfs.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>  #include <linux/buffer_head.h> /* sync_mapping_buffers */
>  #include <linux/fs_context.h>
>  #include <linux/pseudo_fs.h>
> +#include <linux/fsnotify.h>
>  
>  #include <linux/uaccess.h>
>  
> @@ -239,6 +240,75 @@ const struct inode_operations simple_dir_inode_operations = {
>  };
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(simple_dir_inode_operations);
>  
> +static struct dentry *find_next_child(struct dentry *parent, struct dentry *prev)
> +{
> +	struct dentry *child = NULL;
> +	struct list_head *p = prev ? &prev->d_child : &parent->d_subdirs;
> +
> +	spin_lock(&parent->d_lock);
> +	while ((p = p->next) != &parent->d_subdirs) {
> +		struct dentry *d = container_of(p, struct dentry, d_child);
> +		if (simple_positive(d)) {
> +			spin_lock_nested(&d->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED);
> +			if (simple_positive(d))
> +				child = dget_dlock(d);
> +			spin_unlock(&d->d_lock);
> +			if (likely(child))
> +				break;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock);
> +	dput(prev);
> +	return child;
> +}
> +
> +void simple_recursive_removal(struct dentry *dentry,
> +                              void (*callback)(struct dentry *))
> +{
> +	struct dentry *this = dentry;
> +	while (true) {
> +		struct dentry *victim = NULL, *child;
> +		struct inode *inode = this->d_inode;
> +
> +		inode_lock(inode);
> +		if (d_is_dir(this))
> +			inode->i_flags |= S_DEAD;
> +		while ((child = find_next_child(this, victim)) == NULL) {
> +			// kill and ascend
> +			// update metadata while it's still locked
> +			inode->i_ctime = current_time(inode);
> +			clear_nlink(inode);
> +			inode_unlock(inode);
> +			victim = this;
> +			this = this->d_parent;
> +			inode = this->d_inode;
> +			inode_lock(inode);
> +			if (simple_positive(victim)) {
> +				d_invalidate(victim);	// avoid lost mounts
> +				if (d_is_dir(victim))
> +					fsnotify_rmdir(inode, victim);
> +				else
> +					fsnotify_unlink(inode, victim);
> +				if (callback)
> +					callback(victim);
> +				dput(victim);		// unpin it
> +			}
> +			if (victim == dentry) {
> +				inode->i_ctime = inode->i_mtime =
> +					current_time(inode);
> +				if (d_is_dir(dentry))
> +					drop_nlink(inode);
> +				inode_unlock(inode);
> +				dput(dentry);
> +				return;
> +			}
> +		}
> +		inode_unlock(inode);
> +		this = child;
> +	}
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(simple_recursive_removal);
> +
>  static const struct super_operations simple_super_operations = {
>  	.statfs		= simple_statfs,
>  };
> diff --git a/fs/tracefs/inode.c b/fs/tracefs/inode.c
> index eeeae0475da9..2a16c0eb97e4 100644
> --- a/fs/tracefs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/tracefs/inode.c
> @@ -329,7 +329,10 @@ static struct dentry *start_creating(const char *name, struct dentry *parent)
>  		parent = tracefs_mount->mnt_root;
>  
>  	inode_lock(parent->d_inode);
> -	dentry = lookup_one_len(name, parent, strlen(name));
> +	if (unlikely(IS_DEADDIR(parent->d_inode)))
> +		dentry = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
> +	else
> +		dentry = lookup_one_len(name, parent, strlen(name));
>  	if (!IS_ERR(dentry) && dentry->d_inode) {
>  		dput(dentry);
>  		dentry = ERR_PTR(-EEXIST);
> @@ -495,122 +498,27 @@ __init struct dentry *tracefs_create_instance_dir(const char *name,
>  	return dentry;
>  }
>  
> -static int __tracefs_remove(struct dentry *dentry, struct dentry *parent)
> +static void remove_one(struct dentry *victim)
>  {
> -	int ret = 0;
> -
> -	if (simple_positive(dentry)) {
> -		if (dentry->d_inode) {
> -			dget(dentry);
> -			switch (dentry->d_inode->i_mode & S_IFMT) {
> -			case S_IFDIR:
> -				ret = simple_rmdir(parent->d_inode, dentry);
> -				if (!ret)
> -					fsnotify_rmdir(parent->d_inode, dentry);
> -				break;
> -			default:
> -				simple_unlink(parent->d_inode, dentry);
> -				fsnotify_unlink(parent->d_inode, dentry);
> -				break;
> -			}
> -			if (!ret)
> -				d_delete(dentry);
> -			dput(dentry);
> -		}
> -	}
> -	return ret;
> -}
> -
> -/**
> - * tracefs_remove - removes a file or directory from the tracefs filesystem
> - * @dentry: a pointer to a the dentry of the file or directory to be
> - *          removed.
> - *
> - * This function removes a file or directory in tracefs that was previously
> - * created with a call to another tracefs function (like
> - * tracefs_create_file() or variants thereof.)
> - */
> -void tracefs_remove(struct dentry *dentry)
> -{
> -	struct dentry *parent;
> -	int ret;
> -
> -	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dentry))
> -		return;
> -
> -	parent = dentry->d_parent;
> -	inode_lock(parent->d_inode);
> -	ret = __tracefs_remove(dentry, parent);
> -	inode_unlock(parent->d_inode);
> -	if (!ret)
> -		simple_release_fs(&tracefs_mount, &tracefs_mount_count);
> +	simple_release_fs(&tracefs_mount, &tracefs_mount_count);
>  }
>  
>  /**
> - * tracefs_remove_recursive - recursively removes a directory
> + * tracefs_remove - recursively removes a directory
>   * @dentry: a pointer to a the dentry of the directory to be removed.
>   *
>   * This function recursively removes a directory tree in tracefs that
>   * was previously created with a call to another tracefs function
>   * (like tracefs_create_file() or variants thereof.)
>   */
> -void tracefs_remove_recursive(struct dentry *dentry)
> +void tracefs_remove(struct dentry *dentry)
>  {
> -	struct dentry *child, *parent;
> -
>  	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dentry))
>  		return;
>  
> -	parent = dentry;
> - down:
> -	inode_lock(parent->d_inode);
> - loop:
> -	/*
> -	 * The parent->d_subdirs is protected by the d_lock. Outside that
> -	 * lock, the child can be unlinked and set to be freed which can
> -	 * use the d_u.d_child as the rcu head and corrupt this list.
> -	 */
> -	spin_lock(&parent->d_lock);
> -	list_for_each_entry(child, &parent->d_subdirs, d_child) {
> -		if (!simple_positive(child))
> -			continue;
> -
> -		/* perhaps simple_empty(child) makes more sense */
> -		if (!list_empty(&child->d_subdirs)) {
> -			spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock);
> -			inode_unlock(parent->d_inode);
> -			parent = child;
> -			goto down;
> -		}
> -
> -		spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock);
> -
> -		if (!__tracefs_remove(child, parent))
> -			simple_release_fs(&tracefs_mount, &tracefs_mount_count);
> -
> -		/*
> -		 * The parent->d_lock protects agaist child from unlinking
> -		 * from d_subdirs. When releasing the parent->d_lock we can
> -		 * no longer trust that the next pointer is valid.
> -		 * Restart the loop. We'll skip this one with the
> -		 * simple_positive() check.
> -		 */
> -		goto loop;
> -	}
> -	spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock);
> -
> -	inode_unlock(parent->d_inode);
> -	child = parent;
> -	parent = parent->d_parent;
> -	inode_lock(parent->d_inode);
> -
> -	if (child != dentry)
> -		/* go up */
> -		goto loop;
> -
> -	if (!__tracefs_remove(child, parent))
> -		simple_release_fs(&tracefs_mount, &tracefs_mount_count);
> -	inode_unlock(parent->d_inode);
> +	simple_pin_fs(&trace_fs_type, &tracefs_mount, &tracefs_mount_count);
> +	simple_recursive_removal(dentry, remove_one);
> +	simple_release_fs(&tracefs_mount, &tracefs_mount_count);
>  }
>  
>  /**
> diff --git a/include/linux/debugfs.h b/include/linux/debugfs.h
> index 58424eb3b329..0a817d763f0f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/debugfs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/debugfs.h
> @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ struct dentry *debugfs_create_automount(const char *name,
>  					void *data);
>  
>  void debugfs_remove(struct dentry *dentry);
> -void debugfs_remove_recursive(struct dentry *dentry);
> +#define debugfs_remove_recursive debugfs_remove
>  
>  const struct file_operations *debugfs_real_fops(const struct file *filp);
>  
> diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> index 997a530ff4e9..73ffc8654987 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -3242,6 +3242,8 @@ extern int simple_unlink(struct inode *, struct dentry *);
>  extern int simple_rmdir(struct inode *, struct dentry *);
>  extern int simple_rename(struct inode *, struct dentry *,
>  			 struct inode *, struct dentry *, unsigned int);
> +extern void simple_recursive_removal(struct dentry *,
> +                              void (*callback)(struct dentry *));
>  extern int noop_fsync(struct file *, loff_t, loff_t, int);
>  extern int noop_set_page_dirty(struct page *page);
>  extern void noop_invalidatepage(struct page *page, unsigned int offset,
> diff --git a/include/linux/tracefs.h b/include/linux/tracefs.h
> index 88d279c1b863..99912445974c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/tracefs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/tracefs.h
> @@ -28,7 +28,6 @@ struct dentry *tracefs_create_file(const char *name, umode_t mode,
>  struct dentry *tracefs_create_dir(const char *name, struct dentry *parent);
>  
>  void tracefs_remove(struct dentry *dentry);
> -void tracefs_remove_recursive(struct dentry *dentry);
>  
>  struct dentry *tracefs_create_instance_dir(const char *name, struct dentry *parent,
>  					   int (*mkdir)(const char *name),
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> index 563e80f9006a..88d94dc3ed37 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> @@ -8366,7 +8366,7 @@ struct trace_array *trace_array_create(const char *name)
>  
>  	ret = event_trace_add_tracer(tr->dir, tr);
>  	if (ret) {
> -		tracefs_remove_recursive(tr->dir);
> +		tracefs_remove(tr->dir);
>  		goto out_free_tr;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -8422,7 +8422,7 @@ static int __remove_instance(struct trace_array *tr)
>  	event_trace_del_tracer(tr);
>  	ftrace_clear_pids(tr);
>  	ftrace_destroy_function_files(tr);
> -	tracefs_remove_recursive(tr->dir);
> +	tracefs_remove(tr->dir);
>  	free_trace_buffers(tr);
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < tr->nr_topts; i++) {
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
> index 648930823b57..25bb3e8fb170 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
> @@ -696,7 +696,7 @@ static void remove_subsystem(struct trace_subsystem_dir *dir)
>  		return;
>  
>  	if (!--dir->nr_events) {
> -		tracefs_remove_recursive(dir->entry);
> +		tracefs_remove(dir->entry);
>  		list_del(&dir->list);
>  		__put_system_dir(dir);
>  	}
> @@ -715,7 +715,7 @@ static void remove_event_file_dir(struct trace_event_file *file)
>  		}
>  		spin_unlock(&dir->d_lock);
>  
> -		tracefs_remove_recursive(dir);
> +		tracefs_remove(dir);
>  	}
>  
>  	list_del(&file->list);
> @@ -3032,7 +3032,7 @@ int event_trace_del_tracer(struct trace_array *tr)
>  
>  	down_write(&trace_event_sem);
>  	__trace_remove_event_dirs(tr);
> -	tracefs_remove_recursive(tr->event_dir);
> +	tracefs_remove(tr->event_dir);
>  	up_write(&trace_event_sem);
>  
>  	tr->event_dir = NULL;
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c b/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c
> index fa95139445b2..fa45a031848c 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c
> @@ -551,7 +551,7 @@ static int init_tracefs(void)
>  	return 0;
>  
>   err:
> -	tracefs_remove_recursive(top_dir);
> +	tracefs_remove(top_dir);
>  	return -ENOMEM;
>  }
>  
> 

The patch in linux-next

commit 653f0d05be0948e7610bb786e6570bb6c48a4e75 (HEAD, refs/bisect/bad)
Author: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Date:   Mon Nov 18 09:43:10 2019 -0500

    simple_recursive_removal(): kernel-side rm -rf for ramfs-style
filesystems

    two requirements: no file creations in IS_DEADDIR and no cross-directory
    renames whatsoever.

    Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>


Makes my simple QEMU setup crash when booting


[    4.571181] list_del corruption. prev->next should be
ffff8b75df3408d0, but was ffff8b75df340d50
[    4.572064] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[    4.572448] kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:51!
[    4.572838] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI
[    4.573235] CPU: 0 PID: 479 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted
5.5.0-rc1+ #14
[    4.573827] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996),
BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba5276e321-prebuilt.qemu4
[    4.574782] RIP: 0010:__list_del_entry_valid.cold+0x31/0x55
[    4.575252] Code: 0d 3d a8 e8 14 dd bd ff 0f 0b 48 c7 c7 00 0e 3d a8
e8 06 dd bd ff 0f 0b 48 89 f2 48 89 fe 48 c7b
[    4.576829] RSP: 0018:ffffaef9401ebd30 EFLAGS: 00010246
[    4.577283] RAX: 0000000000000054 RBX: ffff8b75df3416c0 RCX:
0000000000000000
[    4.577879] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff8b757fa1a248 RDI:
ffff8b757fa1a248
[    4.578479] RBP: ffff8b75df3407e0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09:
0000000000000000
[    4.579055] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12:
ffff8b75df340860
[    4.579660] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff8b75df3416c0 R15:
ffff8b75d6bda620
[    4.580257] FS:  00007f3016d08940(0000) GS:ffff8b757fa00000(0000)
knlGS:0000000000000000
[    4.580941] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[    4.581425] CR2: 00005555eedf9cf3 CR3: 0000000197fa2000 CR4:
00000000000006f0
[    4.582034] Call Trace:
[    4.582256]  __dentry_kill+0x86/0x190
[    4.582577]  ? dput+0x20/0x460
[    4.582839]  dput+0x2a6/0x460
[    4.583100]  debugfs_remove+0x40/0x60
[    4.583403]  blk_mq_debugfs_unregister_sched+0x15/0x30
[    4.583825]  blk_mq_exit_sched+0x6b/0xa0
[    4.584154]  __elevator_exit+0x32/0x50
[    4.584460]  elevator_switch_mq+0x63/0x170
[    4.584801]  elevator_switch+0x33/0x70
[    4.585114]  elv_iosched_store+0x135/0x1b0
[    4.585450]  queue_attr_store+0x47/0x70
[    4.585779]  kernfs_fop_write+0xdc/0x1c0
[    4.586128]  vfs_write+0xdb/0x1d0
[    4.586423]  ksys_write+0x65/0xe0
[    4.586716]  do_syscall_64+0x5c/0xa0
[    4.587029]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[    4.587472] RIP: 0033:0x7f3017d4a467
[    4.587782] Code: 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb bb 0f 1f 80 00 00
00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 854
[    4.589353] RSP: 002b:00007ffc7fa4f518 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX:
0000000000000001
[    4.589994] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX:
00007f3017d4a467
[    4.590605] RDX: 0000000000000004 RSI: 00007ffc7fa4f600 RDI:
000000000000000f
[    4.591212] RBP: 00007ffc7fa4f600 R08: fefefefefefefeff R09:
ffffffff00000000
[    4.591820] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12:
0000000000000004
[    4.592423] R13: 000055cdeaffe190 R14: 0000000000000004 R15:
00007f3017e1b700
[    4.593032] Modules linked in:
[    4.593307] ---[ end trace 42f66ce1e6e1c1fe ]---
[    4.593694] RIP: 0010:__list_del_entry_valid.cold+0x31/0x55
[    4.594173] Code: 0d 3d a8 e8 14 dd bd ff 0f 0b 48 c7 c7 00 0e 3d a8
e8 06 dd bd ff 0f 0b 48 89 f2 48 89 fe 48 c7b
[    4.595756] RSP: 0018:ffffaef9401ebd30 EFLAGS: 00010246
[    4.596205] RAX: 0000000000000054 RBX: ffff8b75df3416c0 RCX:
0000000000000000
[    4.596818] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff8b757fa1a248 RDI:
ffff8b757fa1a248
[    4.597423] RBP: ffff8b75df3407e0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09:
0000000000000000
[    4.598038] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12:
ffff8b75df340860
[    4.598640] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff8b75df3416c0 R15:
ffff8b75d6bda620
[    4.599241] FS:  00007f3016d08940(0000) GS:ffff8b757fa00000(0000)
knlGS:0000000000000000
[    4.599936] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[    4.600415] CR2: 00005555eedf9cf3 CR3: 0000000197fa2000 CR4:
00000000000006f0
[    4.601034] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:38
[    4.601789] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid:
479, name: systemd-udevd
[    4.602505] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
[    4.602837] CPU: 0 PID: 479 Comm: systemd-udevd Tainted: G      D
       5.5.0-rc1+ #14
[    4.603549] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996),
BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba5276e321-prebuilt.qemu4
[    4.604520] Call Trace:
[    4.604736]  dump_stack+0x8f/0xd0
[    4.605020]  ___might_sleep.cold+0xb3/0xc3
[    4.605374]  exit_signals+0x30/0x2d0
[    4.605689]  do_exit+0xb4/0xc40
[    4.605961]  ? ksys_write+0x65/0xe0
[    4.606256]  rewind_stack_do_exit+0x17/0x20
[    4.606624] note: systemd-udevd[479] exited with preempt_count 2
[    4.611186] list_del corruption. prev->next should be
ffff8b75df3489f0, but was ffff8b75df3480f0
[    4.611972] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[    4.612371] kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:51!
[    4.612783] invalid opcode: 0000 [#2] SMP NOPTI
[    4.613161] CPU: 0 PID: 511 Comm: systemd-udevd Tainted: G      D W
       5.5.0-rc1+ #14
[    4.613875] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996),
BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba5276e321-prebuilt.qemu4
[    4.614842] RIP: 0010:__list_del_entry_valid.cold+0x31/0x55
[    4.615309] Code: 0d 3d a8 e8 14 dd bd ff 0f 0b 48 c7 c7 00 0e 3d a8
e8 06 dd bd ff 0f 0b 48 89 f2 48 89 fe 48 c7b
[    4.616880] RSP: 0018:ffffaef9402a3d30 EFLAGS: 00010246
[    4.617327] RAX: 0000000000000054 RBX: ffff8b75df347240 RCX:
0000000000000000
[    4.617930] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff8b757fa1a248 RDI:
ffff8b757fa1a248
[    4.618541] RBP: ffff8b75df348900 R08: 0000000000000000 R09:
0000000000000001
[    4.619140] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12:
ffff8b75df348980
[    4.619743] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff8b75df347240 R15:
ffff8b75d6a25020
[    4.620349] FS:  00007f3016d08940(0000) GS:ffff8b757fa00000(0000)
knlGS:0000000000000000
[    4.621030] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[    4.621508] CR2: 000055cdeb042e48 CR3: 000000019e202000 CR4:
00000000000006f0
[    4.622099] Call Trace:
[    4.622322]  __dentry_kill+0x86/0x190
[    4.622645]  ? dput+0x20/0x460
[    4.622911]  dput+0x2a6/0x460
[    4.623170]  debugfs_remove+0x40/0x60
[    4.623495]  blk_mq_debugfs_unregister_sched+0x15/0x30
[    4.623929]  blk_mq_exit_sched+0x6b/0xa0
[    4.624264]  __elevator_exit+0x32/0x50
[    4.624593]  elevator_switch_mq+0x63/0x170
[    4.624945]  elevator_switch+0x33/0x70
[    4.625268]  elv_iosched_store+0x135/0x1b0
[    4.625619]  queue_attr_store+0x47/0x70
[    4.625951]  kernfs_fop_write+0xdc/0x1c0
[    4.626289]  vfs_write+0xdb/0x1d0
[    4.626583]  ksys_write+0x65/0xe0
[    4.626870]  do_syscall_64+0x5c/0xa0
[    4.627180]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[    4.627616] RIP: 0033:0x7f3017d4a467
[    4.627925] Code: 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb bb 0f 1f 80 00 00
00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 854
[    4.629499] RSP: 002b:00007ffc7fa4f578 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX:
0000000000000001
[    4.630136] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX:
00007f3017d4a467
[    4.630735] RDX: 0000000000000004 RSI: 00007ffc7fa4f660 RDI:
000000000000000f
[    4.631334] RBP: 00007ffc7fa4f660 R08: fefefefefefefeff R09:
ffffffff00000000
[    4.631940] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12:
0000000000000004
[    4.632540] R13: 000055cdeaffe190 R14: 0000000000000004 R15:
00007f3017e1b700
[    4.633141] Modules linked in:
[    4.633414] ---[ end trace 42f66ce1e6e1c1ff ]---
[    4.633814] RIP: 0010:__list_del_entry_valid.cold+0x31/0x55
[    4.634289] Code: 0d 3d a8 e8 14 dd bd ff 0f 0b 48 c7 c7 00 0e 3d a8
e8 06 dd bd ff 0f 0b 48 89 f2 48 89 fe 48 c7b
[    4.635881] RSP: 0018:ffffaef9401ebd30 EFLAGS: 00010246
[    4.636329] RAX: 0000000000000054 RBX: ffff8b75df3416c0 RCX:
0000000000000000
[    4.636940] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff8b757fa1a248 RDI:
ffff8b757fa1a248
[    4.637544] RBP: ffff8b75df3407e0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09:
0000000000000000
[    4.638149] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12:
ffff8b75df340860
[    4.638750] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff8b75df3416c0 R15:
ffff8b75d6bda620
[    4.639360] FS:  00007f3016d08940(0000) GS:ffff8b757fa00000(0000)
knlGS:0000000000000000
[    4.640047] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[    4.640537] CR2: 000055cdeb042e48 CR3: 000000019e202000 CR4:
00000000000006f0
[    4.641128] note: systemd-udevd[511] exited with preempt_count 2


Reverting that commit makes it work again. How does that untested and
unreviewed patch end up in linux-next? Took me 30min to bisect.

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] dcache: add a new enum type for 'dentry_d_lock_class'
  2019-12-11 15:55           ` David Hildenbrand
@ 2019-12-11 18:46             ` Al Viro
  2019-12-11 19:18               ` David Hildenbrand
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Al Viro @ 2019-12-11 18:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Hildenbrand
  Cc: Matthew Wilcox, yukuai (C),
	gregkh, rafael, rostedt, oleg, mchehab+samsung, corbet, tytso,
	jmorris, linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel, zhengbin13, yi.zhang,
	chenxiang66, xiexiuqi

On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 04:55:56PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:

[snip]

> The patch in linux-next
> 
> commit 653f0d05be0948e7610bb786e6570bb6c48a4e75 (HEAD, refs/bisect/bad)

... is no longer there.  commit a3d1e7eb5abe3aa1095bc75d1a6760d3809bd672
is; could you check if it fixes your reproducer?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] dcache: add a new enum type for 'dentry_d_lock_class'
  2019-12-11 18:46             ` Al Viro
@ 2019-12-11 19:18               ` David Hildenbrand
  2019-12-11 19:27                 ` David Hildenbrand
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: David Hildenbrand @ 2019-12-11 19:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Al Viro
  Cc: Matthew Wilcox, yukuai (C),
	gregkh, rafael, rostedt, oleg, mchehab+samsung, corbet, tytso,
	jmorris, linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel, zhengbin13, yi.zhang,
	chenxiang66, xiexiuqi

On 11.12.19 19:46, Al Viro wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 04:55:56PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> 
> [snip]
> 
>> The patch in linux-next
>>
>> commit 653f0d05be0948e7610bb786e6570bb6c48a4e75 (HEAD, refs/bisect/bad)
> 
> ... is no longer there.  commit a3d1e7eb5abe3aa1095bc75d1a6760d3809bd672
> is; could you check if it fixes your reproducer?
> 

desktop: ~/git/linux memory_holes $ git fetch next
desktop: ~/git/linux memory_holes $ git show
a3d1e7eb5abe3aa1095bc75d1a6760d3809bd672
fatal: bad object a3d1e7eb5abe3aa1095bc75d1a6760d3809bd672

I'll go hunt for that commit :) ... guess it will show up in -next soon.

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] dcache: add a new enum type for 'dentry_d_lock_class'
  2019-12-11 19:18               ` David Hildenbrand
@ 2019-12-11 19:27                 ` David Hildenbrand
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: David Hildenbrand @ 2019-12-11 19:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Al Viro
  Cc: Matthew Wilcox, yukuai (C),
	gregkh, rafael, rostedt, oleg, mchehab+samsung, corbet, tytso,
	jmorris, linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel, zhengbin13, yi.zhang,
	chenxiang66, xiexiuqi

On 11.12.19 20:18, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 11.12.19 19:46, Al Viro wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 04:55:56PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>> The patch in linux-next
>>>
>>> commit 653f0d05be0948e7610bb786e6570bb6c48a4e75 (HEAD, refs/bisect/bad)
>>
>> ... is no longer there.  commit a3d1e7eb5abe3aa1095bc75d1a6760d3809bd672
>> is; could you check if it fixes your reproducer?
>>
> 
> desktop: ~/git/linux memory_holes $ git fetch next
> desktop: ~/git/linux memory_holes $ git show
> a3d1e7eb5abe3aa1095bc75d1a6760d3809bd672
> fatal: bad object a3d1e7eb5abe3aa1095bc75d1a6760d3809bd672
> 
> I'll go hunt for that commit :) ... guess it will show up in -next soon.
> 

Found it on vfs.git - seems to do its job in my setup (booting Fedora 31
with custom kernel in QEMU).

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-12-11 19:27 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-11-30  2:02 [PATCH V2 0/3] fix potential infinite loop in debugfs_remove_recursive yu kuai
2019-11-30  2:02 ` [PATCH V2 1/3] dcache: add a new enum type for 'dentry_d_lock_class' yu kuai
2019-11-30  3:43   ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-11-30  7:53     ` yukuai (C)
2019-11-30 19:36       ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-12-08 19:11         ` Al Viro
2019-12-11 15:55           ` David Hildenbrand
2019-12-11 18:46             ` Al Viro
2019-12-11 19:18               ` David Hildenbrand
2019-12-11 19:27                 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-30  2:02 ` [PATCH 2/3] fs/libfs.c: use 'spin_lock_nested' when taking 'd_lock' for dentry in simple_empty yu kuai
2019-11-30  2:02 ` [PATCH 3/3] debugfs: fix potential infinite loop in debugfs_remove_recursive yu kuai

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).