From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85094C43215 for ; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 18:58:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5835320848 for ; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 18:58:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="IPzouwEZ" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727332AbfLCS6Y (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Dec 2019 13:58:24 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-f67.google.com ([209.85.216.67]:45351 "EHLO mail-pj1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726057AbfLCS6Y (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Dec 2019 13:58:24 -0500 Received: by mail-pj1-f67.google.com with SMTP id r11so1861894pjp.12; Tue, 03 Dec 2019 10:58:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=GQRxs4m4bTH97KHxz6wNsiOvmWYoDMW0dwbQDEY7hL8=; b=IPzouwEZEMsUvDRaFWc3D1oq2hlkTrkSVbgOE1TsxGnVv3/Kb9hGpv92cW5LdRBjQh olxwy9mDIjEvKfxvHU2MRP8agXb84UFgtAUv7vmPQ3V3yhWKy+NyAVjoU/W0YrkskZtG 6CDXhWxiIZnmNSgRdRpXG1GJiahij3nlpgQ//G4zqb8dNLic3HtiATW1Be9cUBGaosLB 8yNyb5v3ViXOCZGWwaALPMyCOOLRm4WXaNph0SV6KhWgo0KfrYin52tes0jUEUNy0BlS cuzrPArcKD0isdfK/Ja9fOGcz4jCVQzc1Ga3XFCIgrmC7ooP7CHdZlNcm9Vr0I1Elh3B p/2Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=GQRxs4m4bTH97KHxz6wNsiOvmWYoDMW0dwbQDEY7hL8=; b=Rp4orhbSpGBGrwN+haZ9EOVTUIOg/fo5kSyNnICfB4LvZjF+YwFgGlA8NZimVD0xXV jUFM0Y432eAMqBxp5lOjt7vSZJutg0+UUXunSgmvqcdz8N59RYutu4a75Edp9pGAiGqK VlKNoW/3o7vQreY+TMsirMPSC0G85+1hw3WJ4laI3LO0xC/oOjNcJUhr0cme3T6X/q+T W+P2UCQfKH570RGXYXp3ScZCdFCvOm47SURsXjEIYkv9Jb4/4QaiPcuEf18Z7kKNd9qt +OLoFwJCkSoum/hto+vRROrDywr2+dC/AzYCmHB2t5ykudqiFobWTCbHYp/jSJI5Zx3X Ke9g== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUmSQwnQ3pQKIf9Wp2Cv444hcsyCO4zbaVWsCu1OJwkGoRmSG9y DQDp303/gBkhXMhrqrpn6VI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxDgNyJPje4n7fK9cP38WqfdhkkaMMqMMLaNIqvs9l6KHP4ce7quz7ybZnZgTqaDZH3BvV1kw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:4e:: with SMTP id 72mr6405913pla.270.1575399503650; Tue, 03 Dec 2019 10:58:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l22sm4039794pjc.0.2019.12.03.10.58.21 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 03 Dec 2019 10:58:22 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2019 10:58:21 -0800 From: Guenter Roeck To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Naresh Kamboju , open list , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Shuah Khan , patches@kernelci.org, Ben Hutchings , lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, linux- stable Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/132] 4.4.204-stable review Message-ID: <20191203185821.GA18554@roeck-us.net> References: <20191127202857.270233486@linuxfoundation.org> <20191129085350.GE3584430@kroah.com> <4808b398-aa8f-01a9-3783-a07344944944@roeck-us.net> <20191203063616.GB1771875@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191203063616.GB1771875@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 07:36:16AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: [ ... ] > > > > > > As you all are doing run-time tests, it would be interesting to see why > > > I saw failures in the Android networking tests with this and the 4.9 > > > queue, but they did not show up in your testing :( > > > > > > > Did you solve this problem, or am I going to get into trouble when I merge this > > release ? > > This was resolved with the 4.4.205 and 4.9.205 releases. > Thanks! Guenter