From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43286C43603 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 18:00:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FF132073B for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 18:00:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1575482403; bh=rQ5ldQcxVnKsALniRRUFyzeOtkp1YGSrRvd9GjrfY3w=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=Rj9binHhDg/NS3SodMK4Lw+WNcs8TtncX4d59JG9g0VHsn5x4KzsJGhciA770n5d7 q5xKc0c3maaI5mWhgorBtk8hoqRB9dwYwIe9h/T0iIWue85Of5guwmYQ4a+1KLH9Xg PCqKz6eCecHdCryBqj1VNy/TSD0YiUzSOqeJ6us8= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729255AbfLDSAC (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Dec 2019 13:00:02 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:37518 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729220AbfLDR75 (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Dec 2019 12:59:57 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [217.68.49.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9CD2F2073B; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 17:59:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1575482397; bh=rQ5ldQcxVnKsALniRRUFyzeOtkp1YGSrRvd9GjrfY3w=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=iMk95Z780lR5msphRm0cfobc7Hov/vS5mqtz9vWL19eQ8Amxv8dXIrkl5yNjBKPF5 Z4fhCqxYazbiS1pHyS3w+fQw699dIOqxbXEUNMnxROvJXpBq+pEAYGlItfJgQ7hFOK jV9ZX6qtUQtlEpfqsubgyxBE5MVPvskqvUIyZ8c4= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet , "David S. Miller" , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.4 70/92] net: fix possible overflow in __sk_mem_raise_allocated() Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2019 18:50:10 +0100 Message-Id: <20191204174334.516953712@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.24.0 In-Reply-To: <20191204174327.215426506@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20191204174327.215426506@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Eric Dumazet [ Upstream commit 5bf325a53202b8728cf7013b72688c46071e212e ] With many active TCP sockets, fat TCP sockets could fool __sk_mem_raise_allocated() thanks to an overflow. They would increase their share of the memory, instead of decreasing it. Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- include/net/sock.h | 2 +- net/core/sock.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h index 5ed4786a2058b..de4434284a34b 100644 --- a/include/net/sock.h +++ b/include/net/sock.h @@ -1282,7 +1282,7 @@ static inline void sk_sockets_allocated_inc(struct sock *sk) percpu_counter_inc(prot->sockets_allocated); } -static inline int +static inline u64 sk_sockets_allocated_read_positive(struct sock *sk) { struct proto *prot = sk->sk_prot; diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c index 8aa4a5f895723..0f4c15fcd87d3 100644 --- a/net/core/sock.c +++ b/net/core/sock.c @@ -2122,7 +2122,7 @@ int __sk_mem_schedule(struct sock *sk, int size, int kind) } if (sk_has_memory_pressure(sk)) { - int alloc; + u64 alloc; if (!sk_under_memory_pressure(sk)) return 1; -- 2.20.1