linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>
To: Sargun Dhillon <sargun@sargun.me>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Containers <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
	Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ptrace: add PTRACE_GETFD request
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2019 17:52:30 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191206065230.uddea7uhslmfemrw@yavin.dot.cyphar.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMp4zn85sz_y8EvXUULVY0a0fAmg91pFkYX5zZSXDz6Q-EiUoA@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2857 bytes --]

On 2019-12-05, Sargun Dhillon <sargun@sargun.me> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 6:38 PM Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 12:44 AM Sargun Dhillon <sargun@sargun.me> wrote:
> > > PTRACE_GETFD is a generic ptrace API that allows the tracer to
> > > get file descriptors from the traceee.
> >
> > typo: tracee
> >
> > > The primary reason to use this syscall is to allow sandboxers to
> > > take action on an FD on behalf of the tracee. For example, this
> > > can be combined with seccomp's user notification feature to extract
> > > a file descriptor and call privileged syscalls, like binding
> > > a socket to a privileged port.
> > [...]
> > > +/* This gets a file descriptor from a running process. It doesn't require the
> > > + * process to be stopped.
> > > + */
> > > +#define PTRACE_GETFD   0x420f
> > [...]
> > > +static int ptrace_getfd(struct task_struct *child, unsigned long fd)
> >
> > I'd make the "fd" parameter of this function an "unsigned int", given
> > that that's also the argument type of fcheck_files().
> >
> > > +{
> > > +       struct files_struct *files;
> > > +       struct file *file;
> > > +       int ret = 0;
> > > +
> > > +       files = get_files_struct(child);
> > > +       if (!files)
> > > +               return -ENOENT;
> > > +
> > > +       spin_lock(&files->file_lock);
> > > +       file = fcheck_files(files, fd);
> > > +       if (!file)
> > > +               ret = -EBADF;
> > > +       else
> > > +               get_file(file);
> > > +       spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
> > > +       put_files_struct(files);
> > > +
> > > +       if (ret)
> > > +               goto out;
> > > +
> > > +       ret = get_unused_fd_flags(0);
> >
> > You're hardcoding the flags for the fd as 0, which means that there is
> > no way for the caller to enable O_CLOEXEC on the fd in a way that is
> > race-free against a concurrent execve(). If you can't easily plumb
> > through an O_CLOEXEC flag from userspace to here, you should probably
> > hardcode O_CLOEXEC here.
> >
> I thought about making addr used for flags. It seems a little weird,
> given the name, but it'll do the job. Alternatively, it could be a
> point to an options struct. If we introduce options, one of the nice
> things we could add is add the ability to cleanse the FD of certain
> information, like cgroups.

If you do end up opting for an options struct, please make sure you use
copy_struct_from_user() or something similar so that we can painlessly
extend it in the future (if necessary). Since there isn't an additional
argument, you might want to do what perf_event_open() does and embed the
size as the first field of the options struct.

-- 
Aleksa Sarai
Senior Software Engineer (Containers)
SUSE Linux GmbH
<https://www.cyphar.com/>

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-06  6:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-05 23:44 Sargun Dhillon
2019-12-06  2:38 ` Jann Horn
2019-12-06  6:16   ` Sargun Dhillon
2019-12-06  6:52     ` Aleksa Sarai [this message]
2019-12-06  8:25 ` Christian Brauner
2019-12-06 12:23   ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-12-06 14:10 ` Tycho Andersen
2019-12-06 19:03   ` Sargun Dhillon
2019-12-06 19:05     ` Jann Horn
2019-12-06 19:05       ` Jann Horn
2019-12-06 20:45 ` Andy Lutomirski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191206065230.uddea7uhslmfemrw@yavin.dot.cyphar.com \
    --to=cyphar@cyphar.com \
    --cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sargun@sargun.me \
    --cc=tycho@tycho.ws \
    --subject='Re: [RFC PATCH] ptrace: add PTRACE_GETFD request' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).