From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74854C43603 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 18:20:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43EC9206DF for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 18:20:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726461AbfLFSUo (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Dec 2019 13:20:44 -0500 Received: from muru.com ([72.249.23.125]:44270 "EHLO muru.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726298AbfLFSUo (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Dec 2019 13:20:44 -0500 Received: from atomide.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muru.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 277C08047; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 18:21:22 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2019 10:20:40 -0800 From: Tony Lindgren To: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" Cc: Nishanth Menon , Tero Kristo , Linux Kernel Mailing List , =?utf-8?B?QW5kcsOp?= Roth , Linux-OMAP , Adam Ford , arm-soc , Discussions about the Letux Kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: Fix warnings with broken omap2_set_init_voltage() Message-ID: <20191206182040.GH35479@atomide.com> References: <20190924233222.52757-1-tony@atomide.com> <8FFD44DB-73F8-4807-91E1-C97DA8F781BA@goldelico.com> <20191202213929.GB35479@atomide.com> <20191203154447.GC35479@atomide.com> <5F430C0D-7F25-4680-87B9-2D65A08A9F83@goldelico.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * H. Nikolaus Schaller [191203 16:55]: > > What we could do is augment the printk (or dev_err) to tell > > in these warnings what it is looking for... > > > > opp = dev_pm_opp_find_freq_ceil(dev, &freq); > > if (IS_ERR(opp)) { > > pr_err("%s: unable to find boot up OPP for vdd_%s freq %ulHz\n", > > __func__, vdd_name, freq); > > goto exit; > > } > > Easier and always prints info: > > freq = clk_get_rate(clk); > clk_put(clk); > > pr_info("%s: vdd=%s clk=%s %luHz oh=%s\n", __func__, vdd_name, clk_name, freq, oh_name); > > opp = dev_pm_opp_find_freq_ceil(dev, &freq); > > I get this: > > [ 2.908142] omap2_set_init_voltage: vdd=mpu_iva clk=dpll1_ck 1000000000Hz oh=mpu > [ 2.930816] omap2_set_init_voltage: vdd=core clk=l3_ick 200000000Hz oh=l3_main > [ 2.946228] omap2_set_init_voltage: unable to find boot up OPP for vdd_core > [ 2.953460] omap2_set_init_voltage: unable to set vdd_core OK yeah that's more descriptive. > Which means that cpufreq already has increased dpll1_ck to 1 GHz > (I have removed the turbo-mode tags so that it already boots at > full speed) and l3_ick runs at initial 200 MHz. OK. I wonder where this initial code should live though.. Regards, Tony