From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@gmail.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-doc <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
notify@kernel.org, SeongJae Park <sjpark@amazon.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation/barriers/kokr: Remove references to [smp_]read_barrier_depends()
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2019 09:00:57 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191209170057.GH2889@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191209094432.GA3306@willie-the-truck>
On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 09:44:33AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 02:51:56PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 11:38:22PM +0100, SeongJae Park wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 11:08 PM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > But since Jon seems to be taking these in his capacity and Documentation
> > > > maintainer, could you please resend CCing him? If we have these changes
> > > > scattered across too many trees, someone is going to get confused,
> > > > and it probably will be me. ;-)
> > >
> > > Agreed, CC-ing Jon to this mail. That said, this is a followup of Will's
> > > patch[1] and the patch is also not queued in Jon's tree. So, I would like to
> > > hear Will's opinion either, if possible.
> > >
> > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191108170120.22331-10-will@kernel.org/
> >
> > Ah, this one got caught out in the conversion from .html to .rst.
> >
> > I did get an ack on one of those, and thus queued it. I clearly need to
> > take another look at Will's series, and thank you for the reminder!
>
> I was planning to include this in the next posting of my series, but I was
> waiting for the merge window to close first. Now that we have -rc1, I'll
> post it this week, although the patches are also queued up in my tree here
> [1] (warning -- rebasing development branch).
>
> I'll leave the patches that are unrelated to smp_read_barrier_depends() to
> Paul and Jon, unless they indicate a preference to the contrary.
I don't know about Jon, but I might need a reminder as to which patches
those are. ;-)
Thanx, Paul
> Will
>
> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/will/linux.git/log/?h=lto
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-09 17:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-08 17:01 [PATCH 00/13] Finish off [smp_]read_barrier_depends() Will Deacon
2019-11-08 17:01 ` [PATCH 01/13] compiler.h: Split {READ,WRITE}_ONCE definitions out into rwonce.h Will Deacon
2019-11-08 19:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-11-11 8:10 ` Christian Borntraeger
2019-11-11 9:32 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-11-12 11:36 ` Will Deacon
2019-11-08 17:01 ` [PATCH 02/13] READ_ONCE: Undefine internal __READ_ONCE_SIZE macro after use Will Deacon
2019-11-08 17:01 ` [PATCH 03/13] READ_ONCE: Allow __READ_ONCE_SIZE cases to be overridden by the architecture Will Deacon
2019-11-08 17:01 ` [PATCH 04/13] vhost: Remove redundant use of read_barrier_depends() barrier Will Deacon
2019-11-08 17:01 ` [PATCH 05/13] alpha: Override READ_ONCE() with barriered implementation Will Deacon
2019-11-08 17:01 ` [PATCH 06/13] READ_ONCE: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends() invocation Will Deacon
2019-11-08 17:01 ` [PATCH 07/13] alpha: Replace smp_read_barrier_depends() usage with smp_[r]mb() Will Deacon
2019-11-08 17:01 ` [PATCH 08/13] locking/barriers: Remove definitions for [smp_]read_barrier_depends() Will Deacon
2019-11-08 17:01 ` [PATCH 09/13] Documentation/barriers: Remove references to [smp_]read_barrier_depends() Will Deacon
2019-11-21 19:32 ` [PATCH] Documentation/barriers/kokr: " SeongJae Park
2019-11-26 22:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-11-29 18:08 ` [PATCH v2] " SeongJae Park
2019-12-06 17:20 ` SeongJae Park
2019-12-06 20:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-12-06 21:29 ` SeongJae Park
2019-12-06 22:08 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-12-06 22:38 ` SeongJae Park
2019-12-06 22:51 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-12-09 9:44 ` Will Deacon
2019-12-09 17:00 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2019-12-09 17:06 ` Will Deacon
2019-12-09 17:43 ` SeongJae Park
2019-11-08 17:01 ` [PATCH 10/13] tools/memory-model: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends() from informal doc Will Deacon
2019-11-08 17:42 ` Alan Stern
2019-11-08 17:01 ` [PATCH 11/13] powerpc: Remove comment about read_barrier_depends() Will Deacon
2019-11-20 10:37 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-11-26 22:24 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-11-08 17:01 ` [PATCH 12/13] include/linux: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends() from comments Will Deacon
2019-11-08 17:01 ` [PATCH 13/13] checkpatch: Remove checks relating to [smp_]read_barrier_depends() Will Deacon
2019-11-08 18:50 ` [PATCH 00/13] Finish off [smp_]read_barrier_depends() Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191209170057.GH2889@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72 \
--to=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=notify@kernel.org \
--cc=sj38.park@gmail.com \
--cc=sjpark@amazon.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).