From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD77BC04E30 for ; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 19:48:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89988206E0 for ; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 19:48:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726771AbfLITsX (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Dec 2019 14:48:23 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:44298 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726342AbfLITsX (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Dec 2019 14:48:23 -0500 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 0C82868BFE; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 20:48:19 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2019 20:48:19 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Paul Burton , James Hogan , Arnd Bergmann , linux-mips , linux-arch , lkml Subject: Re: RFC: kill off ioremap_nocache Message-ID: <20191209194819.GA28157@lst.de> References: <20191209135823.28465-1-hch@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 10:48:20AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > How many conflicts will this result in generally? I like it, but I'd > like to have some idea of whether it ends up being one of those > "really painful churn" things? > > A couple of conflicts isn't an issue - they'll be trivial to fix. It's > the "this causes fifty silly conflicts" that I worry about, partly > because it then makes submaintainers inevitably do the wrong thing (ie > "I foresee an excessive amount of 'git rebase' rants next release"). I had about a dozend and a half conflicts rebasing this weekend, the previous version was approx -rc6 IIRC.