linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-sh <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] mm, memory_hotplug: Provide argument for the pgprot_t in arch_add_memory()
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 09:37:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191211083745.GA14655@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <297b7cc0-c5bc-a4c6-83eb-afc008395234@deltatee.com>

On Tue 10-12-19 16:52:31, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
[...]
> In my opinion, having a coder and reviewer see PAGE_KERNEL and ask if
> that makes sense is a benefit. Having it hidden because we don't want
> people to think about it is worse, harder to understand and results in
> bugs that are more difficult to spot.

My experience would disagree here. We have several examples in the MM
where an overly complex and versatile APIs led to suble bugs, a lot of
copy&pasting and cargo cult programing (just look at the page allocator
as a shiny example - e.g. gfp_flags). So I am always trying to be
carefull here.

> Though, we may be overthinking this: arch_add_memory() is a low level
> non-exported API that's currently used in exactly two places.

This is a fair argument. Most users are and should be using
add_memory().

> I don't
> think there's going to be many, if any, valid new use cases coming up
> for it in the future. That's more what memremap_pages() is for.

OK, fair enough. If this is indeed the simplest way forward then I will
not stand in the way.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-11  8:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-09 19:13 [PATCH 0/6] Allow setting caching mode in arch_add_memory() for P2PDMA Logan Gunthorpe
2019-12-09 19:13 ` [PATCH 1/6] x86/mm: Thread pgprot_t through init_memory_mapping() Logan Gunthorpe
2019-12-09 19:13 ` [PATCH 2/6] x86/mm: Introduce _set_memory_prot() Logan Gunthorpe
2019-12-09 19:13 ` [PATCH 3/6] powerpc/mm: Thread pgprot_t through create_section_mapping() Logan Gunthorpe
2019-12-09 19:13 ` [PATCH 4/6] s390/mm: Thread pgprot_t through vmem_add_mapping() Logan Gunthorpe
2019-12-09 19:13 ` [PATCH 5/6] mm, memory_hotplug: Provide argument for the pgprot_t in arch_add_memory() Logan Gunthorpe
2019-12-09 19:23   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-12-09 20:24     ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-12-09 20:41       ` Michal Hocko
2019-12-09 21:00         ` Dan Williams
2019-12-09 21:27           ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-12-09 21:24         ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-12-10  9:56           ` Michal Hocko
2019-12-09 20:43       ` Dan Williams
2019-12-09 20:52         ` David Hildenbrand
2019-12-10 10:04         ` Michal Hocko
2019-12-10 10:09           ` David Hildenbrand
2019-12-10 10:34             ` Michal Hocko
2019-12-10 11:25               ` David Hildenbrand
2019-12-10 23:52                 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-12-11  8:37                   ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2019-12-09 19:13 ` [PATCH 6/6] mm/memremap: Set caching mode for PCI P2PDMA memory to WC Logan Gunthorpe
2019-12-09 20:43 ` [PATCH 0/6] Allow setting caching mode in arch_add_memory() for P2PDMA Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191211083745.GA14655@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=logang@deltatee.com \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).