From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Felix Schnizlein <fschnizlein@suse.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Felix Schnizlein <fschnizlein@suse.de>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux@armlinux.org.uk, will.deacon@arm.com, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86 cpuinfo: implement sysfs nodes for x86
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 15:57:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191211145700.GA639677@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2139491.Komy7AgBfX@skinner.arch.suse.de>
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 03:52:33PM +0100, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 11, 2019 3:26:47 PM CET Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 03:12:51PM +0100, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, December 11, 2019 2:56:19 PM CET Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 11:42:35AM +0100, Thomas Renninger wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > I hope it is agreed that this info is worth exporting via sysfs.
> >
> > I don't think anyone is saying it is worth exporting this information
> > via sysfs at all here.
>
> Ok. I go for cpuid userspace tool then.
>
> I'd still say general files like:
> cpu/info/{name,vendor}
> make sense, so that if exported by an arch like in cpuinfo, it should show up
> in the same file.
> Every cpu has a model name and a vendor and cpuid is x86 only.
I think you just saw the ARM developers arguing about model names, so I
don't think people will agree with that :)
goo dluck!
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-11 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-06 16:24 [PATCH v5 0/3] sysfs: add sysfs based cpuinfo Thomas Renninger
2019-12-06 16:24 ` [PATCH 1/3] cpuinfo: add sysfs based arch independent cpuinfo framework Thomas Renninger
2019-12-06 16:33 ` Greg KH
2019-12-06 16:56 ` Randy Dunlap
2019-12-06 16:24 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86 cpuinfo: implement sysfs nodes for x86 Thomas Renninger
2019-12-06 16:36 ` Greg KH
2019-12-10 20:48 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-12-10 20:53 ` Greg KH
2019-12-11 10:42 ` Thomas Renninger
2019-12-11 13:56 ` Greg KH
2019-12-11 14:12 ` Thomas Renninger
2019-12-11 14:26 ` Greg KH
2019-12-11 14:52 ` Thomas Renninger
2019-12-11 14:57 ` Greg KH [this message]
2019-12-06 16:24 ` [PATCH 3/3] arm64 cpuinfo: implement sysfs nodes for arm64 Thomas Renninger
2019-12-06 16:37 ` Greg KH
2019-12-09 10:31 ` Will Deacon
2019-12-09 11:28 ` Thomas Renninger
2019-12-09 17:38 ` Will Deacon
2019-12-10 13:33 ` Thomas Renninger
2019-12-10 14:47 ` Greg KH
2019-12-10 16:24 ` Thomas Renninger
2019-12-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] sysfs: add sysfs based cpuinfo Mark Rutland
2019-12-06 17:29 ` Thomas Renninger
2019-12-06 18:16 ` Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191211145700.GA639677@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=fschnizlein@suse.com \
--cc=fschnizlein@suse.de \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=trenn@suse.de \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).