From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
y2038@lists.linaro.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: [PATCH v2 09/12] nfsd: fix jiffies/time_t mixup in LRU list
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 15:10:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191213141046.1770441-10-arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191213141046.1770441-1-arnd@arndb.de>
The nfsd4_blocked_lock->nbl_time timestamp is recorded in jiffies,
but then compared to a CLOCK_REALTIME timestamp later on, which makes
no sense.
For consistency with the other timestamps, change this to use a time_t.
This is a change in behavior, which may cause regressions, but the
current code is not sensible. On a system with CONFIG_HZ=1000,
the 'time_after((unsigned long)nbl->nbl_time, (unsigned long)cutoff))'
check is false for roughly the first 18 days of uptime and then true
for the next 49 days.
Fixes: 7919d0a27f1e ("nfsd: add a LRU list for blocked locks")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 2 +-
fs/nfsd/state.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
index 5cb0f774218a..9a063c4b4460 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -6549,7 +6549,7 @@ nfsd4_lock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
}
if (fl_flags & FL_SLEEP) {
- nbl->nbl_time = jiffies;
+ nbl->nbl_time = get_seconds();
spin_lock(&nn->blocked_locks_lock);
list_add_tail(&nbl->nbl_list, &lock_sop->lo_blocked);
list_add_tail(&nbl->nbl_lru, &nn->blocked_locks_lru);
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/state.h b/fs/nfsd/state.h
index 2b4165cd1d3e..03fc7b4380f9 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/state.h
+++ b/fs/nfsd/state.h
@@ -606,7 +606,7 @@ static inline bool nfsd4_stateid_generation_after(stateid_t *a, stateid_t *b)
struct nfsd4_blocked_lock {
struct list_head nbl_list;
struct list_head nbl_lru;
- unsigned long nbl_time;
+ time_t nbl_time;
struct file_lock nbl_lock;
struct knfsd_fh nbl_fh;
struct nfsd4_callback nbl_cb;
--
2.20.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-13 20:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-13 14:10 [PATCH v2 00/12] nfsd: avoid 32-bit time_t Arnd Bergmann
2019-12-13 14:10 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] nfsd: use ktime_get_seconds() for timestamps Arnd Bergmann
2019-12-13 14:10 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] nfsd: print 64-bit timestamps in client_info_show Arnd Bergmann
2019-12-13 14:10 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] nfsd: handle nfs3 timestamps as unsigned Arnd Bergmann
2019-12-13 14:10 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] nfsd: use timespec64 in encode_time_delta Arnd Bergmann
2019-12-13 14:10 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] nfsd: make 'boot_time' 64-bit wide Arnd Bergmann
2019-12-13 14:10 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] nfsd: pass a 64-bit guardtime to nfsd_setattr() Arnd Bergmann
2019-12-13 14:10 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] nfsd: use time64_t in nfsd_proc_setattr() check Arnd Bergmann
2019-12-13 14:10 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] nfsd: fix delay timer on 32-bit architectures Arnd Bergmann
2019-12-13 14:10 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2019-12-13 14:10 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] nfsd: use boottime for lease expiry alculation Arnd Bergmann
2019-12-13 16:26 ` Chuck Lever
2019-12-13 16:40 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-12-13 18:23 ` Chuck Lever
2019-12-13 21:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-12-13 21:13 ` Bruce Fields
2019-12-13 21:19 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-12-20 2:57 ` J. Bruce Fields
2019-12-13 14:10 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] nfsd: use ktime_get_real_seconds() in nfs4_verifier Arnd Bergmann
2019-12-13 14:10 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] nfsd: remove nfs4_reset_lease() declarations Arnd Bergmann
2019-12-18 17:21 ` [PATCH v2 00/12] nfsd: avoid 32-bit time_t Arnd Bergmann
2019-12-18 17:24 ` J. Bruce Fields
2019-12-18 18:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191213141046.1770441-10-arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=y2038@lists.linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).