From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68A3DC2D0C8 for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 09:00:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34CBB2146E for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 09:00:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1576573259; bh=xAX0PRZHP/FMnReTRbQbZgrSB/CF9jeXgcinFfc+AGc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=1k5s7OO5w7IfXIYrYjDaEJkBhxRhaQs/k3J5iubCR9t0i2Anhb9fQqVIFKXSUtJ3v lYcd+iMljdbC8e0J5OlKWm0UqgDVmwcXgY/HSdMJseQDoRgS+XABCwZyCDUKdIazUl CODWAb8FLt4a0Ih2Lyc1jEstXSeC9VxHRNK+XfZo= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727160AbfLQJA6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Dec 2019 04:00:58 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f67.google.com ([209.85.128.67]:35563 "EHLO mail-wm1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726743AbfLQJA5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Dec 2019 04:00:57 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f67.google.com with SMTP id p17so2163534wmb.0 for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 01:00:56 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=mZx7PX3XtfO3qJUEKG2W3+v5puR8ZcOAgW53SrnG1Rc=; b=BZyxkIZHzoTIAZb7PkiiOhGGWtt9Orwc8Jtj2XpELuPFEX5DptGuQ/duSIZ1o1RyA3 9iexUq/FGwRN82fakhPjdSjoJgzTWOgpsSt4wai03y2Oox7qE29AAJJXNWPqn0vs/CeP rO7CD+Ly4lhtwBoGRg0PXRiBsL/Df7Gn7aToLmEohb+1FweqmgipDFh7m0e8i6L+jU+w 8S8s7fQ7Rn0lU9MeEfmCrD/BNbXVpmxhGA1sTlPhPIjiO7ZjEXd2et8EBCJqSgy3TNqF dq5b9mSmhRL4FrhoRIIsu535Ew5N+3esockKGRBzmY64PU5wzcdzQWszYCtGzMuedwkd q59w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVXx02PamZvYZAGpDmHQ1K7R7qbtQr2bokdM6GHSU/bfeqjokMq Nfm1VXXUGWHSaVfT/2PkOs4hN/qo X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz1ZPSuW692DjIqgtNqoG0fDxuqI/SuDMEZDBxv1n/Z46mQVepJF+UcqZ/1r3GQHv7ofaTjbQ== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c934:: with SMTP id h20mr4044497wml.103.1576573255589; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 01:00:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (prg-ext-pat.suse.com. [213.151.95.130]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b68sm2311610wme.6.2019.12.17.01.00.54 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 17 Dec 2019 01:00:54 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 10:00:54 +0100 From: Michal Hocko To: Mike Kravetz , Waiman Long Cc: Andrew Morton , Matthew Wilcox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com, Jarod Wilson Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/hugetlb: defer free_huge_page() to a workqueue Message-ID: <20191217090054.GA31063@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <32d2d4f2-83b9-2e40-05e2-71cd07e01b80@redhat.com> <0fcce71f-bc20-0ea3-b075-46592c8d533d@oracle.com> <20191212060650.ftqq27ftutxpc5hq@linux-p48b> <20191212063050.ufrpij6s6jkv7g7j@linux-p48b> <20191212190427.ouyohviijf5inhur@linux-p48b> <79d3a7e1-384b-b759-cd84-56253fb9ed40@redhat.com> <20191216132658.GG30281@dhcp22.suse.cz> <98ac628d-f8be-270d-80bc-bf2373299caf@redhat.com> <21a92649-bb9f-b024-e52b-4ce9355f973b@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <21a92649-bb9f-b024-e52b-4ce9355f973b@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon 16-12-19 13:44:53, Waiman Long wrote: > On 12/16/19 10:38 AM, Waiman Long wrote: [...] > >> Can you extract guts of the testcase and integrate them into hugetlb > >> test suite? > > BTW, what hugetlb test suite are you talking about? I was using tests from libhugetlbfs package in the past. There are few tests in LTP project but the libhugetlbfs coverage used to cover the largest part of the functionality. Is there any newer home for the package than [1], Mike? Btw. would it mak sense to migrate those tests to a more common place, LTP or kernel selftests? [1] https://github.com/libhugetlbfs/libhugetlbfs/tree/master/tests -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs