From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B612CC2D0CF for ; Tue, 24 Dec 2019 11:39:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C38B2063A for ; Tue, 24 Dec 2019 11:39:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1577187599; bh=76LeYx5ATgK4RI2xSo0Bw3zrxNom4RO62S0t04dneWY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=O4tnB0YghmhshSfO+oXOIOQYKn+7lBxM87wUgBqeMJNLQuzExSbWt6AC4tEfHv41B RLkqplomGj8fFmKegCj0wfbF3ytBvFb7YDAhucPgkQKV+Rk9wFUl2ck47IIdF8c3wj /lq3allKavQ9zChnqqKWqGbgyRj24DODnvYs/AC4= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726214AbfLXLj4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Dec 2019 06:39:56 -0500 Received: from inca-roads.misterjones.org ([213.251.177.50]:40549 "EHLO inca-roads.misterjones.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726102AbfLXLj4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Dec 2019 06:39:56 -0500 Received: from 78.163-31-62.static.virginmediabusiness.co.uk ([62.31.163.78] helo=why.lan) by cheepnis.misterjones.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1iji6B-000169-Fg; Tue, 24 Dec 2019 12:11:36 +0100 From: Marc Zyngier To: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Eric Auger , James Morse , Julien Thierry , Suzuki K Poulose , Thomas Gleixner , Jason Cooper , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Andrew Murray , Zenghui Yu , Robert Richter Subject: [PATCH v3 26/32] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Eagerly vmap vPEs Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2019 11:10:49 +0000 Message-Id: <20191224111055.11836-27-maz@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20191224111055.11836-1-maz@kernel.org> References: <20191224111055.11836-1-maz@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 62.31.163.78 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, eric.auger@redhat.com, james.morse@arm.com, julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, jason@lakedaemon.net, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, Andrew.Murray@arm.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com, rrichter@marvell.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on cheepnis.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Now that we have HW-accelerated SGIs being delivered to VPEs, it becomes required to map the VPEs on all ITSs instead of relying on the lazy approach that we would use when using the ITS-list mechanism. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier --- drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c index 5126bdcfe079..3234bb9fbdbe 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c @@ -1554,12 +1554,31 @@ static int its_irq_set_irqchip_state(struct irq_data *d, return 0; } +/* + * Two favourable cases: + * + * (a) Either we have a GICv4.1, and all vPEs have to be mapped at all times + * for vSGI delivery + * + * (b) Or the ITSs do not use a list map, meaning that VMOVP is cheap enough + * and we're better off mapping all VPEs always + * + * If neither (a) nor (b) is true, then we map vPEs on demand. + * + */ +static bool gic_requires_eager_mapping(void) +{ + if (!its_list_map || gic_rdists->has_rvpeid) + return true; + + return false; +} + static void its_map_vm(struct its_node *its, struct its_vm *vm) { unsigned long flags; - /* Not using the ITS list? Everything is always mapped. */ - if (!its_list_map) + if (gic_requires_eager_mapping()) return; raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&vmovp_lock, flags); @@ -1593,7 +1612,7 @@ static void its_unmap_vm(struct its_node *its, struct its_vm *vm) unsigned long flags; /* Not using the ITS list? Everything is always mapped. */ - if (!its_list_map) + if (gic_requires_eager_mapping()) return; raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&vmovp_lock, flags); @@ -4109,8 +4128,12 @@ static int its_vpe_irq_domain_activate(struct irq_domain *domain, struct its_vpe *vpe = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d); struct its_node *its; - /* If we use the list map, we issue VMAPP on demand... */ - if (its_list_map) + /* + * If we use the list map, we issue VMAPP on demand... Unless + * we're on a GICv4.1 and we eagerly map the VPE on all ITSs + * so that VSGIs can work. + */ + if (!gic_requires_eager_mapping()) return 0; /* Map the VPE to the first possible CPU */ @@ -4136,10 +4159,10 @@ static void its_vpe_irq_domain_deactivate(struct irq_domain *domain, struct its_node *its; /* - * If we use the list map, we unmap the VPE once no VLPIs are - * associated with the VM. + * If we use the list map on GICv4.0, we unmap the VPE once no + * VLPIs are associated with the VM. */ - if (its_list_map) + if (!gic_requires_eager_mapping()) return; list_for_each_entry(its, &its_nodes, entry) { -- 2.20.1