linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/refcount: add sparse annotations to dec-and-lock functions
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2019 12:49:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191228114918.GU2827@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191226152922.2034-1-ebiggers@kernel.org>

On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 09:29:22AM -0600, Eric Biggers wrote:
> From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
> 
> Wrap refcount_dec_and_lock() and refcount_dec_and_lock_irqsave() with
> macros using __cond_lock() so that 'sparse' doesn't report warnings
> about unbalanced locking when using them.
> 
> This is the same thing that's done for their atomic_t equivalents.
> 
> Don't annotate refcount_dec_and_mutex_lock(), because mutexes don't
> currently have sparse annotations.

I so f'ing hate that __cond_lock() crap. Previously I've suggested
fixing sparse instead of making such an atrocious trainwreck of the
code.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-28 11:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-26 15:29 [PATCH] locking/refcount: add sparse annotations to dec-and-lock functions Eric Biggers
2019-12-28 11:49 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2019-12-28 20:15   ` Eric Biggers
2019-12-30 18:43   ` Kees Cook
2019-12-30 19:15     ` Eric Biggers
2019-12-30 19:32       ` Kees Cook
2019-12-30 23:38         ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2020-01-03  1:35           ` Linus Torvalds
2020-01-03  2:18             ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2020-01-03 12:55           ` Dan Carpenter
2020-01-06 15:41           ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-01-06 17:54             ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2020-01-07  9:29               ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-01-06 15:26         ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191228114918.GU2827@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=elena.reshetova@intel.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).