Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 05/13] tools/libbpf: Add support in libbpf for BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM

[KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org>]

On 23-Dez 16:07, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 7:43 AM KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org> wrote:
> >
> > From: KP Singh <kpsingh@google.com>
> >
> > Update the libbpf library with functionality to load and
> > attach a program type BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM, currently with
> > only one expected attach type BPF_LSM_MAC.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@google.com>
> > ---
> >  tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c           |  2 +-
> >  tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h           |  6 +++++
> >  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c        | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> >  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h        |  2 ++
> >  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map      |  6 +++++
> >  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_probes.c |  1 +
> >  6 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
> > index 98596e15390f..9c6fb083f7de 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
> > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
> > @@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ int bpf_load_program_xattr(const struct bpf_load_program_attr *load_attr,
> >         memset(&attr, 0, sizeof(attr));
> >         attr.prog_type = load_attr->prog_type;
> >         attr.expected_attach_type = load_attr->expected_attach_type;
> > -       if (attr.prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING) {
> > +       if (needs_btf_attach(attr.prog_type)) {
> >                 attr.attach_btf_id = load_attr->attach_btf_id;
> >                 attr.attach_prog_fd = load_attr->attach_prog_fd;
> >         } else {
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
> > index 3c791fa8e68e..df2a00ff349f 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
> > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
> > @@ -177,6 +177,12 @@ LIBBPF_API int bpf_task_fd_query(int pid, int fd, __u32 flags, char *buf,
> >                                  __u32 *buf_len, __u32 *prog_id, __u32 *fd_type,
> >                                  __u64 *probe_offset, __u64 *probe_addr);
> >
> > +static inline bool needs_btf_attach(enum bpf_prog_type prog_type)
> > +{
> > +       return (prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING ||
> > +               prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM);
> > +}
> > +
> 
> This doesn't have to be a public API, right? It also doesn't follow
> naming conventions of libbpf APIs. Let's just move it into
> libbpf_internal.h, given it's used in few files.
> 
> Also, Martin's patches add STRUCT_OPS, which do need btf_attach, but
> don't set attach_prog_fd. So maybe something like
> libbpf_need_attach_prog_btf() for a name to be a bit more specific?

Updated for the next revision. Thanks!

> 
> 
> >  #ifdef __cplusplus
> >  } /* extern "C" */
> >  #endif
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> > index b20f82e58989..b0b27d8e5a37 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> > @@ -3738,7 +3738,7 @@ load_program(struct bpf_program *prog, struct bpf_insn *insns, int insns_cnt,
> >         load_attr.insns = insns;
> >         load_attr.insns_cnt = insns_cnt;
> >         load_attr.license = license;
> > -       if (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING) {
> > +       if (needs_btf_attach(prog->type)) {
> >                 load_attr.attach_prog_fd = prog->attach_prog_fd;
> >                 load_attr.attach_btf_id = prog->attach_btf_id;
> >         } else {
> > @@ -3983,7 +3983,7 @@ __bpf_object__open(const char *path, const void *obj_buf, size_t obj_buf_sz,
> >
> >                 bpf_program__set_type(prog, prog_type);
> >                 bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(prog, attach_type);
> > -               if (prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING) {
> > +               if (needs_btf_attach(prog_type)) {
> >                         err = libbpf_find_attach_btf_id(prog->section_name,
> >                                                         attach_type,
> >                                                         attach_prog_fd);
> > @@ -4933,6 +4933,7 @@ bool bpf_program__is_##NAME(const struct bpf_program *prog)       \
> >  }                                                              \
> >
> >  BPF_PROG_TYPE_FNS(socket_filter, BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER);
> > +BPF_PROG_TYPE_FNS(lsm, BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM);
> >  BPF_PROG_TYPE_FNS(kprobe, BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE);
> >  BPF_PROG_TYPE_FNS(sched_cls, BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS);
> >  BPF_PROG_TYPE_FNS(sched_act, BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_ACT);
> > @@ -5009,6 +5010,8 @@ static const struct {
> >         BPF_PROG_SEC("lwt_out",                 BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_OUT),
> >         BPF_PROG_SEC("lwt_xmit",                BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_XMIT),
> >         BPF_PROG_SEC("lwt_seg6local",           BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_SEG6LOCAL),
> > +       BPF_PROG_BTF("lsm/",                    BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM,
> > +                                               BPF_LSM_MAC),
> 
> Is is supposed to be attachable same as BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING
> programs? If yes, please define auto-attaching function, similar to
> SEC_DEF("raw_tp") few lines below this one.

Nice! rebased and updated. 

> 
> >         BPF_APROG_SEC("cgroup_skb/ingress",     BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB,
> >                                                 BPF_CGROUP_INET_INGRESS),
> >         BPF_APROG_SEC("cgroup_skb/egress",      BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB,
> > @@ -5119,32 +5122,39 @@ int libbpf_prog_type_by_name(const char *name, enum bpf_prog_type *prog_type,
> >         return -ESRCH;
> >  }
> >
> > -#define BTF_PREFIX "btf_trace_"
> > +static inline int __btf__typdef_with_prefix(struct btf *btf, const char *name,
> 
> typo: typdef -> typedef
> 
> But actually let's generalize it to pass BTF_KIND as another param, I
> think I have a need for this (we might want to do that for structs,
> not just typedef->func_proto).
> Following btf__find_by_name_kind() naming, it probably should be
> called btf__find_by_prefix_kind()?

Thanks! Good idea, updated. Should this be moved to btf.c?

> 
> > +                                           const char *prefix)
> > +{
> > +
> > +       size_t prefix_len = strlen(prefix);
> > +       char btf_type_name[128];
> > +
> > +       strcpy(btf_type_name, prefix);
> > +       strncat(btf_type_name, name, sizeof(btf_type_name) - (prefix_len + 1));
> 
> at this point snprintf(btf_type_name, "%s%.*%s", prefix,
> sizeof(btf_type_name) - prefix_len - 1, name) looks like a better and
> cleaner alternative.

I just changed it to:

  snprintf(btf_type_name, sizeof(btf_type_name), "%s%s", prefix, name);
 
- KP

> 
> > +       return btf__find_by_name_kind(btf, btf_type_name, BTF_KIND_TYPEDEF);
> > +}
> > +
> > +#define BTF_TRACE_PREFIX "btf_trace_"
> > +#define BTF_LSM_PREFIX "lsm_btf_"
> > +
> 
> [...]