From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Morten Rasmussen <Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>, Parth Shah <parth@linux.ibm.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched, fair: Allow a small degree of load imbalance between SD_NUMA domains v2
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 13:29:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200107122943.GW2827@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200107114211.GH3466@techsingularity.net>
On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 11:42:11AM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 12:22:55PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > + /* Consider allowing a small imbalance between NUMA groups */
> > > + if (env->sd->flags & SD_NUMA) {
> > > + struct sched_domain *child = env->sd->child;
> >
> > This assumes sd-child exists, which should be true for NUMA domains I
> > suppose.
> >
>
> I would be stunned if it was not. What sort of NUMA domain would not have
> child domains? Does a memory-only NUMA node with no CPUs even generate
> a scheduler domain? If it does, then I guess the check is necessary.
I think it's fine, it was just my paranoia triggering. At the very least
we'll have the single CPU domain there.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-07 12:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-20 8:42 [PATCH] sched, fair: Allow a small degree of load imbalance between SD_NUMA domains v2 Mel Gorman
2019-12-20 12:40 ` Valentin Schneider
2019-12-20 14:22 ` Mel Gorman
2019-12-20 15:32 ` Valentin Schneider
2019-12-21 11:25 ` Mel Gorman
2019-12-22 12:00 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2019-12-23 13:31 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-12-23 13:41 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-01-03 14:31 ` Mel Gorman
2020-01-06 13:55 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-01-06 14:52 ` Mel Gorman
2020-01-07 8:38 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-01-07 9:56 ` Mel Gorman
2020-01-07 11:17 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-01-07 11:56 ` Mel Gorman
2020-01-07 16:00 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-01-07 20:24 ` Mel Gorman
2020-01-08 8:25 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-01-08 8:49 ` Mel Gorman
2020-01-08 13:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-01-08 14:03 ` Mel Gorman
2020-01-08 16:46 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-01-08 18:03 ` Mel Gorman
2020-01-07 11:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-01-07 11:42 ` Mel Gorman
2020-01-07 12:29 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-01-07 12:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-01-07 19:26 ` Phil Auld
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200107122943.GW2827@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=parth@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pauld@redhat.com \
--cc=quentin.perret@arm.com \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).