linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the m68k tree
@ 2020-01-12 22:50 Stephen Rothwell
  2020-01-27 20:49 ` Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2020-01-12 22:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Al Viro, Geert Uytterhoeven
  Cc: Linux Next Mailing List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kars de Jong,
	Aleksa Sarai

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1146 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the vfs tree got a conflict in:

  arch/m68k/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl

between commit:

  e8bb2a2a1d51 ("m68k: Wire up clone3() syscall")

from the m68k tree and commit:

  0a51692d49ec ("open: introduce openat2(2) syscall")

from the vfs tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc arch/m68k/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
index a00a5d0db602,2559925f1924..000000000000
--- a/arch/m68k/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
+++ b/arch/m68k/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
@@@ -434,4 -434,5 +434,5 @@@
  432	common	fsmount				sys_fsmount
  433	common	fspick				sys_fspick
  434	common	pidfd_open			sys_pidfd_open
 -# 435 reserved for clone3
 +435	common	clone3				__sys_clone3
+ 437	common	openat2				sys_openat2

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the m68k tree
  2020-01-12 22:50 linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the m68k tree Stephen Rothwell
@ 2020-01-27 20:49 ` Stephen Rothwell
  2020-01-27 21:39   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2020-01-27 20:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Al Viro
  Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven, Linux Next Mailing List,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kars de Jong, Aleksa Sarai

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1439 bytes --]

Hi all,

On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 09:50:37 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the vfs tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/m68k/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   e8bb2a2a1d51 ("m68k: Wire up clone3() syscall")
> 
> from the m68k tree and commit:
> 
>   0a51692d49ec ("open: introduce openat2(2) syscall")
> 
> from the vfs tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
> 
> diff --cc arch/m68k/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> index a00a5d0db602,2559925f1924..000000000000
> --- a/arch/m68k/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> +++ b/arch/m68k/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> @@@ -434,4 -434,5 +434,5 @@@
>   432	common	fsmount				sys_fsmount
>   433	common	fspick				sys_fspick
>   434	common	pidfd_open			sys_pidfd_open
>  -# 435 reserved for clone3
>  +435	common	clone3				__sys_clone3
> + 437	common	openat2				sys_openat2

This is now a conflict between the vfs tree and Linus' tree - just a
reminder for pull requests.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the m68k tree
  2020-01-27 20:49 ` Stephen Rothwell
@ 2020-01-27 21:39   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2020-01-27 21:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell
  Cc: Al Viro, Linux Next Mailing List, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
	Kars de Jong, Aleksa Sarai

Hi Stephen,

On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 9:49 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 09:50:37 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > Today's linux-next merge of the vfs tree got a conflict in:
> >
> >   arch/m68k/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> >   e8bb2a2a1d51 ("m68k: Wire up clone3() syscall")
> >
> > from the m68k tree and commit:
> >
> >   0a51692d49ec ("open: introduce openat2(2) syscall")
> >
> > from the vfs tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > complex conflicts.
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Stephen Rothwell
> >
> > diff --cc arch/m68k/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> > index a00a5d0db602,2559925f1924..000000000000
> > --- a/arch/m68k/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> > +++ b/arch/m68k/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> > @@@ -434,4 -434,5 +434,5 @@@
> >   432 common  fsmount                         sys_fsmount
> >   433 common  fspick                          sys_fspick
> >   434 common  pidfd_open                      sys_pidfd_open
> >  -# 435 reserved for clone3
> >  +435 common  clone3                          __sys_clone3
> > + 437 common  openat2                         sys_openat2
>
> This is now a conflict between the vfs tree and Linus' tree - just a
> reminder for pull requests.

Thanks, I completely forgot about these conflicts.
Fortunately I always send my pull requests early ;-)

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the m68k tree
@ 2020-09-10  0:31 Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2020-09-10  0:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Al Viro, Geert Uytterhoeven
  Cc: Christoph Hellwig, Linux Next Mailing List, Linux Kernel Mailing List

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2416 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the vfs tree got a conflict in:

  arch/m68k/Kconfig

between commit:

  dc072012bc94 ("m68k: Sort selects in main Kconfig")

from the m68k tree and commit:

  5e6e9852d6f7 ("uaccess: add infrastructure for kernel builds with set_fs()")

from the vfs tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc arch/m68k/Kconfig
index c830705bd3ac,dcf4ae8c9b21..000000000000
--- a/arch/m68k/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/m68k/Kconfig
@@@ -6,33 -6,33 +6,34 @@@ config M68
  	select ARCH_HAS_BINFMT_FLAT
  	select ARCH_HAS_DMA_PREP_COHERENT if HAS_DMA && MMU && !COLDFIRE
  	select ARCH_HAS_SYNC_DMA_FOR_DEVICE if HAS_DMA
 +	select ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG if RMW_INSNS
  	select ARCH_MIGHT_HAVE_PC_PARPORT if ISA
  	select ARCH_NO_PREEMPT if !COLDFIRE
 +	select ARCH_WANT_IPC_PARSE_VERSION
  	select BINFMT_FLAT_ARGVP_ENVP_ON_STACK
  	select DMA_DIRECT_REMAP if HAS_DMA && MMU && !COLDFIRE
 -	select HAVE_IDE
 -	select HAVE_AOUT if MMU
 -	select HAVE_ASM_MODVERSIONS
 -	select HAVE_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE
 -	select GENERIC_IRQ_SHOW
  	select GENERIC_ATOMIC64
 -	select NO_DMA if !MMU && !COLDFIRE
 -	select HAVE_UID16
 -	select VIRT_TO_BUS
 -	select ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG if RMW_INSNS
  	select GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES
  	select GENERIC_IOMAP
 +	select GENERIC_IRQ_SHOW
  	select GENERIC_STRNCPY_FROM_USER if MMU
  	select GENERIC_STRNLEN_USER if MMU
 -	select ARCH_WANT_IPC_PARSE_VERSION
 +	select HAVE_AOUT if MMU
 +	select HAVE_ASM_MODVERSIONS
 +	select HAVE_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE
  	select HAVE_FUTEX_CMPXCHG if MMU && FUTEX
 +	select HAVE_IDE
  	select HAVE_MOD_ARCH_SPECIFIC
 +	select HAVE_UID16
 +	select MMU_GATHER_NO_RANGE if MMU
  	select MODULES_USE_ELF_REL
  	select MODULES_USE_ELF_RELA
 -	select OLD_SIGSUSPEND3
 +	select NO_DMA if !MMU && !COLDFIRE
  	select OLD_SIGACTION
 -	select MMU_GATHER_NO_RANGE if MMU
 +	select OLD_SIGSUSPEND3
+ 	select SET_FS
 +	select UACCESS_MEMCPY if !MMU
 +	select VIRT_TO_BUS
  
  config CPU_BIG_ENDIAN
  	def_bool y

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the m68k tree
@ 2020-09-08  1:24 Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2020-09-08  1:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Al Viro, Geert Uytterhoeven
  Cc: Christoph Hellwig, Linux Next Mailing List, Linux Kernel Mailing List

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2429 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the vfs tree got a conflict in:

  arch/m68k/Kconfig

between commit:

  dc072012bc94 ("m68k: Sort selects in main Kconfig")
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>

from the m68k tree and commit:

  0d4ca5778ffd ("uaccess: add infrastructure for kernel builds with set_fs()")

from the vfs tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc arch/m68k/Kconfig
index 93bbb74ea876,dcf4ae8c9b21..000000000000
--- a/arch/m68k/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/m68k/Kconfig
@@@ -6,32 -6,33 +6,33 @@@ config M68
  	select ARCH_HAS_BINFMT_FLAT
  	select ARCH_HAS_DMA_PREP_COHERENT if HAS_DMA && MMU && !COLDFIRE
  	select ARCH_HAS_SYNC_DMA_FOR_DEVICE if HAS_DMA
 +	select ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG if RMW_INSNS
  	select ARCH_MIGHT_HAVE_PC_PARPORT if ISA
  	select ARCH_NO_PREEMPT if !COLDFIRE
 +	select ARCH_WANT_IPC_PARSE_VERSION
  	select BINFMT_FLAT_ARGVP_ENVP_ON_STACK
  	select DMA_DIRECT_REMAP if HAS_DMA && MMU && !COLDFIRE
 -	select HAVE_IDE
 -	select HAVE_AOUT if MMU
 -	select HAVE_ASM_MODVERSIONS
 -	select HAVE_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE
 -	select GENERIC_IRQ_SHOW
  	select GENERIC_ATOMIC64
 -	select NO_DMA if !MMU && !COLDFIRE
 -	select HAVE_UID16
 -	select VIRT_TO_BUS
 -	select ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG if RMW_INSNS
  	select GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES
  	select GENERIC_IOMAP
 +	select GENERIC_IRQ_SHOW
  	select GENERIC_STRNCPY_FROM_USER if MMU
  	select GENERIC_STRNLEN_USER if MMU
 -	select ARCH_WANT_IPC_PARSE_VERSION
 +	select HAVE_AOUT if MMU
 +	select HAVE_ASM_MODVERSIONS
 +	select HAVE_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE
  	select HAVE_FUTEX_CMPXCHG if MMU && FUTEX
 +	select HAVE_IDE
  	select HAVE_MOD_ARCH_SPECIFIC
 +	select HAVE_UID16
 +	select MMU_GATHER_NO_RANGE if MMU
  	select MODULES_USE_ELF_REL
  	select MODULES_USE_ELF_RELA
 -	select OLD_SIGSUSPEND3
 +	select NO_DMA if !MMU && !COLDFIRE
  	select OLD_SIGACTION
 -	select MMU_GATHER_NO_RANGE if MMU
 +	select OLD_SIGSUSPEND3
+ 	select SET_FS
 +	select VIRT_TO_BUS
  
  config CPU_BIG_ENDIAN
  	def_bool y

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-09-10  2:05 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-01-12 22:50 linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the m68k tree Stephen Rothwell
2020-01-27 20:49 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-01-27 21:39   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-09-08  1:24 Stephen Rothwell
2020-09-10  0:31 Stephen Rothwell

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).