From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, vdavydov.dev@gmail.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com,
alexander.duyck@gmail.com, rientjes@google.com
Subject: Re: [Patch v2] mm: thp: grab the lock before manipulation defer list
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 10:31:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200114093122.GH19428@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200111000352.efy6krudecpshezh@box>
On Sat 11-01-20 03:03:52, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 10:30:54PM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
> > As all the other places, we grab the lock before manipulate the defer list.
> > Current implementation may face a race condition.
> >
> > For example, the potential race would be:
> >
> > CPU1 CPU2
> > mem_cgroup_move_account split_huge_page_to_list
> > !list_empty
> > lock
> > !list_empty
> > list_del
> > unlock
> > lock
> > # !list_empty might not hold anymore
> > list_del_init
> > unlock
>
> I don't think this particular race is possible. Both parties take page
> lock before messing with deferred queue, but anytway:
>
> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
I am confused, if the above race is not possible then what would be a
real race? We really do not want to have a patch with a misleading
changelog, do we?
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-14 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-09 14:30 [Patch v2] mm: thp: grab the lock before manipulation defer list Wei Yang
2020-01-09 18:52 ` David Rientjes
2020-01-09 18:58 ` Michal Hocko
2020-01-11 0:03 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2020-01-12 2:28 ` Wei Yang
2020-01-12 22:57 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2020-01-13 0:44 ` Wei Yang
2020-01-13 7:36 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2020-01-13 8:23 ` Wei Yang
2020-01-14 9:31 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2020-01-14 10:31 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2020-01-14 10:59 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2020-01-14 20:57 ` David Rientjes
2020-01-15 1:19 ` Wei Yang
2020-01-15 1:07 ` Wei Yang
2020-01-15 3:26 ` David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200114093122.GH19428@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=richardw.yang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).