From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kunit-next tree
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 16:57:03 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200116165703.4e04be51@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 911 bytes --]
Hi all,
After merging the kunit-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: drivers/base/test/property-entry-test.o: in function `kunit_test_suites_init':
property-entry-test.c:(.text+0x26): undefined reference to `kunit_run_tests'
x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: drivers/base/test/property-entry-test.o: in function `pe_test_reference':
property-entry-test.c:(.text+0x275): undefined reference to `kunit_binary_assert_format'
x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: property-entry-test.c:(.text+0x2c4): undefined reference to `kunit_do_assertion'
and lots more ...
Caused by commit
27f9d7e984d9 ("software node: introduce CONFIG_KUNIT_DRIVER_PE_TEST")
from the pm tree interacting with commit
35c57fc3f8ea ("kunit: building kunit as a module breaks allmodconfig")
I have disabled CONFIG_KUNIT_DRIVER_PE_TEST for today.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2020-01-16 5:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-16 5:57 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2020-01-16 11:23 ` linux-next: build failure after merge of the kunit-next tree Alan Maguire
2020-01-16 23:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-02-29 4:26 Stephen Rothwell
2024-02-29 15:07 ` Shuah Khan
2024-03-01 7:15 ` David Gow
2024-03-01 10:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-01 16:05 ` Shuah Khan
2024-03-01 20:46 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-01 22:30 ` Shuah Khan
2024-03-06 15:25 ` Shuah Khan
2024-02-28 2:48 Stephen Rothwell
2024-02-28 3:26 ` Shuah Khan
2020-01-10 6:43 Stephen Rothwell
2020-01-10 11:56 ` Alan Maguire
2020-01-13 21:11 ` Brendan Higgins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200116165703.4e04be51@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=alan.maguire@oracle.com \
--cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).