From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F775C33CB3 for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 10:10:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3696D24681 for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 10:10:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="Om+3agWx" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729418AbgAQKJ7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jan 2020 05:09:59 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f68.google.com ([209.85.221.68]:36626 "EHLO mail-wr1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726979AbgAQKJx (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jan 2020 05:09:53 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f68.google.com with SMTP id z3so22111879wru.3 for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 02:09:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=YISpyKpQLeyZzuM7GvuVJ7EJ8elz6lBBgLI3G6qJUsI=; b=Om+3agWx46v380MyT9qje7b/bQzpX0c/qhvN22fywDLm1tTCm2GcXoYQ2lCUebzlgj 3yCWrKdYDnUKiF9C/Rl//6Jls4A8WD/DloB3kmzerntdReN50d6xl42Jc9uogVPAoPor OuvmwQXwvrKcSpE0pJ39dVTZx1Fm3qmAVT4THCgI1y9k/yN7EFRcBeg1CH8lmF3nDwcK 8D77pMvun+tUB3cx9FAs0Z0kpLv2ZKDCxfMbA2gOQ8y+QAAQS6LT/8U7pW6qLZegb2G3 PNXNu3euC1TTSJ0Wdc9eer67lT/9qPZH9pYOMNEkBVTttE2l0Cpxb64y3CIeMobWjFfb LfCg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=YISpyKpQLeyZzuM7GvuVJ7EJ8elz6lBBgLI3G6qJUsI=; b=FRMZ+49qhX51CpnXKXOoYRfPI4RLExxhJf1wpecwKhKVBKzBNoI5UjULFlauPdSz03 dmo0fHtH8OeEIoH62EusYF2X0nIOjGlxn94E+5yK8pUJY3ZPkDw0gg02FOIDWeIqv5Z6 4xgUwrtHpp6SimMyMNGhvKuKsQG5oEMoris+nbCFaLis1zlmwfTHBK7dj4hnQQFgseMw PnTLbKaui8EVTlJLyrkYQdNUgcLozUuXqxbgahJFk8RbHogwyMOgBC1J4ZicJQWium/B fI+KDUlR/Hdn7fHO2r/NZ36zK472zPdxH5N+CFdGvRWdAzFqVOYxnGGZ27+VWCwHwBlw tzBQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX+T6g5VFXDw05RUBUUVR2hOxOeWcjCaSqzYYpPXc/mh7vWzID1 VLReDQqIIzCoUMrSynSBh3FadDJLCQ0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxqEtLipEsHaogoR2jMoOo5aO/vN4KHKR3WBBi6RlhbAW3j19TXXptHwp0RyDPCHGXRHpnrbA== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6089:: with SMTP id w9mr2243772wrt.228.1579255791363; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 02:09:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from dell ([2.27.35.221]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5sm33493552wrh.5.2020.01.17.02.09.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 17 Jan 2020 02:09:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 10:10:09 +0000 From: Lee Jones To: "Vaittinen, Matti" Cc: "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" , "mazziesaccount@gmail.com" , "sashal@kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: bd70528: Fix hour register mask Message-ID: <20200117101009.GC15507@dell> References: <20200115082933.GA29117@localhost.localdomain> <83e8e1ecc40a58e2e6d1960bbb41c8dcfe730ce1.camel@fi.rohmeurope.com> <20200117075714.GA1822218@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 17 Jan 2020, Vaittinen, Matti wrote: > > On Fri, 2020-01-17 at 08:57 +0100, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 07:44:07AM +0000, Vaittinen, Matti wrote: > > > > > > Is it possible to get this in 5.4 stable - while leaving this out > > > of > > > current MFD tree and applying the BD71828 series to MFD? > > > > We only take patches that are in Linus's tree for the stable tree, > > unless there are very big reasons not to do so (i.e. it is totally > > rewritten in a different way there.) > > > > Once the change/fix is in Linus's tree, then you can backport it to > > stable in a different way if you want, but you need to give lots of > > reasons why it is done that way. > > Right. Thanks for the explanation Greg. I have no _strong_ reasons - > which means I'll split the RTC support patch in BD71828 series into two > - first of the patches being this fix, second being the BD71828 > support. Then this fix can be taken in 5.4 after it has been merged to > Linus' tree - the BD71828 support can be omitted from 5.4 > > I hope the BD71828 series could still make it to next release - but if > it wont, then it might be in next after that :] > > Lee, please skip this one, I'll do v10 of the BD71828 series where this > fix is included as separate fix-patch. Will look out for it. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Linaro Services Technical Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog