From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 319D4C2D0CE for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 16:22:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00A5E2467B for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 16:22:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1579623723; bh=K2PZ/+4GjiOGUCYLzFSr3lohBpgUtOogc4UefTtZ+t8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=zckRvv3ffkomC91KYsJaOXS4P+gbniJaIrDtGUGpjwU1pmSGX6WckhMlBus2E/Vu8 gxJtOZ/ULoszoTeBUmbiyrvgP3EBjI1GnTSjt7i7xpBQWdnLO+iKpbnCn6p/EMZVZ2 hgNO+iUn/ccaYmH1t1qFZo7GTbbs2mGQcj/y0Yns= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729462AbgAUQWC (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jan 2020 11:22:02 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:45460 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729273AbgAUQWA (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jan 2020 11:22:00 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B06F30E; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 08:22:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.37.6.21]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5879C3F68E; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 08:21:59 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 16:21:57 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Mika Westerberg Cc: Andy Shevchenko , Darren Hart , Lee Jones , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , "H . Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, Zha Qipeng , "David E . Box" , Guenter Roeck , Heikki Krogerus , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Wim Van Sebroeck , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/38] platform/x86: Rework intel_scu_ipc and intel_pmc_ipc drivers Message-ID: <20200121162157.GD4656@sirena.org.uk> References: <20200121160114.60007-1-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="q9KOos5vDmpwPx9o" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200121160114.60007-1-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> X-Cookie: You too can wear a nose mitten. User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --q9KOos5vDmpwPx9o Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 07:00:36PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > Currently both intel_scu_ipc.c and intel_pmc_ipc.c implement the same SCU > IPC communications with minor differences. This duplication does not make > much sense so this series reworks the two drivers so that there is only a > single implementation of the SCU IPC. In addition to that the API will be This is a 40 (!) patch series and looking at the subjects and diffstat I can't tell if there's something in particular that you're looking for me to review? --q9KOos5vDmpwPx9o Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAl4nJSUACgkQJNaLcl1U h9BLZQf/VjNChJv9k7JPur4zWfGS9+F5nNaFNi/af//akiLUMZatxAjyHirSeg4w ijrObLzU6lw/gTnSukoe7UMUK36nerMpELth4L6PYNl1xUGX3YI/nvNY8kUu3TuA HqKDeckqzB17Mxqel0BWiieLSNBxtQiNm/kpPnAmXV8lxFKeAcbfJQPlqg3DbYb0 7axbbqExSm8QBYbi4sbsXS+s5rRhVvCF1WBUqIckF8ui+P58pXuTTN1IiCSghXlB BID9lv+jXGFAdzS0db11i/qpJnLY1Bq7uX6/i4KwhNq+62Mnb+IhxKrxNgoEkQY3 I3vQWHmuJqIED0G0Uqv9o1kZHx4zig== =d0Tm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --q9KOos5vDmpwPx9o--