From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34E54C2D0CE for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 17:50:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F23362051A for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 17:50:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="Xy60esaQ" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729186AbgAURuJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jan 2020 12:50:09 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.120]:50702 "EHLO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728186AbgAURuJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jan 2020 12:50:09 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1579629007; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ae5Z+En0sqtjb39dBwdtiY6FkcMFIgmXM3FcN+xtsjE=; b=Xy60esaQvChiTQVbz1eOkL9QNyn5Qwa96n/F1QNqOn3YdobEO/GpxcUeiMk3qDGr/iO7nO MpXAmBKDoDo6XLvavCnNZLFsaRLufJSIXW/nX/D2DFSboNCoL0Fz46GlKTDUPbfPVazcWZ BUD5gRUnpXe/Q994luOX91LbEB5putw= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-295-ozcYZBHiPnaFXzkGo2UiIg-1; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 12:50:06 -0500 X-MC-Unique: ozcYZBHiPnaFXzkGo2UiIg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDD5C18B5FA2; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 17:50:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from treble (ovpn-122-154.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.122.154]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FA1E8BE2F; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 17:50:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 11:50:01 -0600 From: Josh Poimboeuf To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Julien Thierry , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, raphael.gault@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC v5 00/57] objtool: Add support for arm64 Message-ID: <20200121175001.5jltrjuxrjklq5o2@treble> References: <20200109160300.26150-1-jthierry@redhat.com> <20200120150711.GD14897@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200120150711.GD14897@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 04:07:11PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 04:02:03PM +0000, Julien Thierry wrote: > > In the mean time, any feedback on the current state is appreciated. > > > > * Patches 1 to 18 adapts the current objtool code to make it easier to > > support new architectures. > > In the interrest of moving things along; I've looked through these > and 1-14,16 look good to me, 17,18 hurt my brain. > > Josh, what say you? Agreed. Julien, thanks a lot for splitting these up nicely. If you post 1-14 (updated based on the recent comments), we can look at merging those sooner. 15-18 also hurt my brain -- probably a symptom of the existing fragile mess -- so I'll need to spend more time staring at them. -- Josh