From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>,
cristian.marussi@arm.com, Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>,
peter.hilber@opensynergy.com,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] firmware: arm_scmi: Make scmi core independent of the transport type
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 18:38:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200121183818.GA11522@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a0fWf-wd8exJa+_UL9n0bQ26W6wd0iQH32osM1Q+cLu_w@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 04:11:11PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 9:27 AM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > The SCMI specification is fairly independent of the transport protocol,
> > which can be a simple mailbox (already implemented) or anything else.
> > The current Linux implementation however is very much dependent on the
> > mailbox transport layer.
> >
> > This patch makes the SCMI core code (driver.c) independent of the
> > mailbox transport layer and moves all mailbox related code to a new
> > file: mailbox.c.
> >
> > We can now implement more transport protocols to transport SCMI
> > messages.
> >
> > The transport protocols just need to provide struct scmi_transport_ops,
> > with its version of the callbacks to enable exchange of SCMI messages.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > @Sudeep: Can you please help me getting this tested?
> >
Sure(I may need to rebase on top of -next to test on top of what's queued
for v5.6)
> > V2->V3:
> > - Added more ops to the structure to read/write/memcpy data
> > - Payload is moved to mailbox.c and is handled in transport specific way
> > now. This resulted in lots of changes.
>
> This addresses the comments I had about the implementation.
>
Thanks for review and all the suggestions Arnd.
> It's still hard for me to judge whether this is a good abstraction as
> long as there is only one backend in the framework, but I see nothing
> immediately wrong with it either.
>
Peter and Peng(both in cc) is trying out virtio and smc/hvc based transport
respectively. Hopefully they will raise concerns(if any) with the abstraction.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-21 18:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-21 8:27 [PATCH V3] firmware: arm_scmi: Make scmi core independent of the transport type Viresh Kumar
2020-01-21 15:11 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-01-21 18:38 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2020-01-22 2:36 ` [PATCH V4] " Viresh Kumar
2020-01-22 12:15 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-01-23 10:30 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-01-23 11:27 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-01-23 11:37 ` Cristian Marussi
2020-01-23 15:17 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-01-24 3:02 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-01-24 11:22 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-01-24 12:15 ` Peter Hilber
2020-01-24 18:28 ` Jassi Brar
2020-01-22 12:44 ` [PATCH V3] " Cristian Marussi
2020-01-23 2:39 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-01-23 11:06 ` Cristian Marussi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200121183818.GA11522@bogus \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=jassisinghbrar@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
--cc=peter.hilber@opensynergy.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).