linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dynamic_debug: allow to work if debugfs is disabled
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 09:12:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200122081205.GA2227985@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200122080352.GA15354@willie-the-truck>

On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 08:03:53AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 08:43:43AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > With the realization that having debugfs enabled on "production" systems is
> > generally not a good idea, debugfs is being disabled from more and more
> > platforms over time.  However, the functionality of dynamic debugging still is
> > needed at times, and since it relies on debugfs for its user api, having
> > debugfs disabled also forces dynamic debug to be disabled.
> 
> Why is the dyndbg= command-line option not sufficient for these use-cases?

They want to enable things after booting, and changing the kernel
command line is not something you can do on many systems (i.e.
locked-down-bootloaders like embedded systems).

Also, the whole option is prevented to be booted if debugfs is not
enabled, so the command line wouldn't even work in that situation :)

> > To get around this, move the "control" file for dynamic_debug to procfs IFF
> > debugfs is disabled.  This lets people turn on debugging as needed at runtime
> > for individual driverfs and subsystems.
> 
> Hmm. If something called "dynamic_debug" is getting moved out of debugfs,
> this does raise the question as to what (if anything) should be left behind.
> I worry this is a bit of a slippery slope...

I totally agree, but dynamic_debug is independant of debugfs with the
exception of the control file itself.

> > Reported-by: many different companies
> > Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> > ---
> >  .../admin-guide/dynamic-debug-howto.rst         |  3 +++
> >  lib/Kconfig.debug                               |  2 +-
> >  lib/dynamic_debug.c                             | 17 ++++++++++++++---
> >  3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/dynamic-debug-howto.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/dynamic-debug-howto.rst
> > index 252e5ef324e5..41f43a373a6a 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/dynamic-debug-howto.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/dynamic-debug-howto.rst
> > @@ -54,6 +54,9 @@ If you make a mistake with the syntax, the write will fail thus::
> >  				<debugfs>/dynamic_debug/control
> >    -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument
> >  
> > +Note, for systems without 'debugfs' enabled, the control file can be
> > +also found in ``/proc/dynamic_debug/control``.
> > +
> >  Viewing Dynamic Debug Behaviour
> >  ===============================
> >  
> > diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> > index 5ffe144c9794..01d4add8b963 100644
> > --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
> > +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> > @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ config DYNAMIC_DEBUG
> >  	bool "Enable dynamic printk() support"
> >  	default n
> >  	depends on PRINTK
> > -	depends on DEBUG_FS
> > +	depends on (DEBUG_FS || PROC_FS)
> >  	help
> >  
> >  	  Compiles debug level messages into the kernel, which would noti
> 
> The help text here also needs updating, since it refers to debugfs.

Oops, missed that, thanks!

> > diff --git a/lib/dynamic_debug.c b/lib/dynamic_debug.c
> > index c60409138e13..077b2d6623ac 100644
> > --- a/lib/dynamic_debug.c
> > +++ b/lib/dynamic_debug.c
> > @@ -993,13 +993,24 @@ static __initdata int ddebug_init_success;
> >  
> >  static int __init dynamic_debug_init_debugfs(void)
> >  {
> > -	struct dentry *dir;
> > +	struct dentry *debugfs_dir;
> > +	struct proc_dir_entry *procfs_dir;
> >  
> >  	if (!ddebug_init_success)
> >  		return -ENODEV;
> >  
> > -	dir = debugfs_create_dir("dynamic_debug", NULL);
> > -	debugfs_create_file("control", 0644, dir, NULL, &ddebug_proc_fops);
> > +	/* Create the control file in debugfs if it is enabled */
> > +	if (debugfs_initialized) {
> > +		debugfs_dir = debugfs_create_dir("dynamic_debug", NULL);
> > +		debugfs_create_file("control", 0644, debugfs_dir, NULL,
> > +				    &ddebug_proc_fops);
> > +		return 0;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/* No debugfs so put it in procfs instead */
> > +	procfs_dir = proc_mkdir("dynamic_debug", NULL);
> > +	if (procfs_dir)
> > +		proc_create("control", 0x644, procfs_dir, &ddebug_proc_fops);
> 
> Shouldn't this be octal rather than hex? Even then, I don't understand what
> use it is being able to read but not write to this file. Perhaps make it
> 0600 for /proc ?

Argh, my fault, fingers are used to typing hex.

You can read from the file to see what the current settings are, I was
just trying to mirror the debugfs permissions.

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-22  8:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-22  7:43 [PATCH] dynamic_debug: allow to work if debugfs is disabled Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-01-22  8:03 ` Will Deacon
2020-01-22  8:12   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2020-01-22 13:53     ` [PATCH v2] " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-01-22 18:56       ` Jason Baron
2020-01-22 19:29         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-01-22 19:31           ` [PATCH v3] " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-01-22 21:43             ` Randy Dunlap
2020-01-23  8:48               ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-01-23  8:50                 ` [PATCH v4] " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-01-23  9:36                   ` Will Deacon
2020-01-23 15:53             ` [PATCH v3] " Theodore Y. Ts'o
2020-01-23 17:55               ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-01-24  6:02                 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2020-01-24  7:29                   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-01-25  1:42                     ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2020-01-25 17:11                       ` Jonathan Corbet
2020-01-27 22:19                         ` Saravana Kannan
2020-02-09 11:05               ` [PATCH v5] " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-02-09 15:53                 ` Joe Perches
2020-02-09 17:03                   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-02-10 21:11                 ` [PATCH v6] " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-02-10 21:15                   ` Randy Dunlap
2020-02-12 21:58                     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-02-11 11:01                   ` Will Deacon
2020-01-25  0:03 ` [PATCH] " kbuild test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200122081205.GA2227985@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).