From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: Enable compile testing for some of drivers
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 10:12:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200123091228.GB1105@ninjato> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1578384779-15487-1-git-send-email-krzk@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 497 bytes --]
> config I2C_ZX2967
> tristate "ZTE ZX2967 I2C support"
> - depends on ARCH_ZX
> - default y
> + depends on ARCH_ZX || (COMPILE_TEST && (ARC || ARM || ARM64 || M68K || RISCV || SUPERH || SPARC))
> + # COMPILE_TEST needs architectures with readsX()/writesX() primitives
The list of archs neither looks pretty nor very maintainable. My
suggestion is that we leave this out of COMPILE_TEST until we have
something like ARCH_HAS_READS or something. What do you think?
> + default y if ARCH_ZX
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-23 9:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-07 8:12 [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: Enable compile testing for some of drivers Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-01-07 8:12 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] i2c: exynos: Update Kconfig documentation Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-01-23 9:13 ` Wolfram Sang
2020-01-23 10:59 ` Wolfram Sang
2020-01-23 9:12 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2020-01-23 9:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: Enable compile testing for some of drivers Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-01-23 9:41 ` Wolfram Sang
2020-01-23 10:00 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-01-23 12:46 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-01-23 10:59 ` Wolfram Sang
2020-01-23 15:31 ` Marc Gonzalez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200123091228.GB1105@ninjato \
--to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.de \
--cc=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).