From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27F5EC2D0DB for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 16:22:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E841A206D5 for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 16:22:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b="mqlDVbcQ" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729787AbgA0QWM (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jan 2020 11:22:12 -0500 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:56214 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729600AbgA0QWL (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jan 2020 11:22:11 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=jqVwM+IjEqXkV9M8NMwyyP0+f47l+p41i+3R+JYJ8V0=; b=mqlDVbcQuEeg/xh8juESDnyTCA EV2SZgsM9/mfEMZJntjYI9HKbPXJqaMO9Wb8xI61gyQhiLVoN8pYugGUCzVwVVMARE5yqbfHIgc4C n36zZTIJ9TfLD0EB81WznFHWH9SK9Znf3960J3xkKLzQOT64vsdoDoDqD9p11Av2TsOU=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1iw79K-0007AO-8b; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 17:22:06 +0100 Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2020 17:22:06 +0100 From: Andrew Lunn To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin Cc: Jose Abreu , Joao Pinto , Alexandre Torgue , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com" , Florian Fainelli , Maxime Coquelin , Jakub Kicinski , Giuseppe Cavallaro , "David S. Miller" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Heiner Kallweit Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 6/8] net: phylink: Configure MAC/PCS when link is up without PHY Message-ID: <20200127162206.GJ13647@lunn.ch> References: <9a2136885d9a892ff170be88fdffeda82c778a10.1580122909.git.Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com> <20200127112102.GT25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20200127114600.GU25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20200127140038.GD13647@lunn.ch> <20200127140834.GW25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20200127145107.GE13647@lunn.ch> <20200127161132.GX25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200127161132.GX25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Heiner has another device which has an Aquantia PHY running in an odd > > mode so that it does 1G over a T2 link. It uses SGMII for this, and > > that is where we first noticed the issue of the MAC and PCS having > > different configurations. > > Do you know when the issue appeared? As far as i understand, it never worked, it is not a regression as such. But Heiner probably knows more. Andrew