From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] kvm: x86: Emulate MSR IA32_CORE_CAPABILITIES
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2020 13:43:00 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200203214300.GI19638@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200203151608.28053-6-xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 11:16:07PM +0800, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
> Emulate MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPABILITIES in software and unconditionally
> advertise its support to userspace. Like MSR_IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES, it
> is a feature-enumerating MSR and can be fully emulated regardless of
> hardware support. Existence of CORE_CAPABILITIES is enumerated via
> CPUID.(EAX=7H,ECX=0):EDX[30].
>
> Note, support for individual features enumerated via CORE_CAPABILITIES,
> e.g., split lock detection, will be added in future patches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
> arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c | 5 +++--
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 329d01c689b7..dc231240102f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -591,6 +591,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
> u64 ia32_xss;
> u64 microcode_version;
> u64 arch_capabilities;
> + u64 core_capabilities;
>
> /*
> * Paging state of the vcpu
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> index b1c469446b07..7282d04f3a6b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> @@ -409,10 +409,11 @@ static inline void do_cpuid_7_mask(struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry, int index)
> boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_AMD_SSBD))
> entry->edx |= F(SPEC_CTRL_SSBD);
> /*
> - * We emulate ARCH_CAPABILITIES in software even
> - * if the host doesn't support it.
> + * ARCH_CAPABILITIES and CORE_CAPABILITIES are emulated in
> + * software regardless of host support.
> */
> entry->edx |= F(ARCH_CAPABILITIES);
> + entry->edx |= F(CORE_CAPABILITIES);
> break;
> case 1:
> entry->eax &= kvm_cpuid_7_1_eax_x86_features;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 821b7404c0fd..a97a8f5dd1df 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -1222,6 +1222,7 @@ static const u32 emulated_msrs_all[] = {
> MSR_IA32_TSC_ADJUST,
> MSR_IA32_TSCDEADLINE,
> MSR_IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES,
> + MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPS,
> MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE,
> MSR_IA32_MCG_STATUS,
> MSR_IA32_MCG_CTL,
> @@ -1288,6 +1289,7 @@ static const u32 msr_based_features_all[] = {
> MSR_F10H_DECFG,
> MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV,
> MSR_IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES,
> + MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPS,
> };
>
> static u32 msr_based_features[ARRAY_SIZE(msr_based_features_all)];
> @@ -1341,12 +1343,20 @@ static u64 kvm_get_arch_capabilities(void)
> return data;
> }
>
> +static u64 kvm_get_core_capabilities(void)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int kvm_get_msr_feature(struct kvm_msr_entry *msr)
> {
> switch (msr->index) {
> case MSR_IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES:
> msr->data = kvm_get_arch_capabilities();
> break;
> + case MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPS:
> + msr->data = kvm_get_core_capabilities();
> + break;
> case MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV:
> rdmsrl_safe(msr->index, &msr->data);
> break;
> @@ -2716,6 +2726,11 @@ int kvm_set_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
> return 1;
> vcpu->arch.arch_capabilities = data;
> break;
> + case MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPS:
> + if (!msr_info->host_initiated)
Shouldn't @data be checked against kvm_get_core_capabilities()?
> + return 1;
> + vcpu->arch.core_capabilities = data;
> + break;
> case MSR_EFER:
> return set_efer(vcpu, msr_info);
> case MSR_K7_HWCR:
> @@ -3044,6 +3059,12 @@ int kvm_get_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
> return 1;
> msr_info->data = vcpu->arch.arch_capabilities;
> break;
> + case MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPS:
> + if (!msr_info->host_initiated &&
> + !guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_CORE_CAPABILITIES))
> + return 1;
> + msr_info->data = vcpu->arch.core_capabilities;
> + break;
> case MSR_IA32_POWER_CTL:
> msr_info->data = vcpu->arch.msr_ia32_power_ctl;
> break;
> @@ -9288,6 +9309,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_create(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> goto free_guest_fpu;
>
> vcpu->arch.arch_capabilities = kvm_get_arch_capabilities();
> + vcpu->arch.core_capabilities = kvm_get_core_capabilities();
> vcpu->arch.msr_platform_info = MSR_PLATFORM_INFO_CPUID_FAULT;
> kvm_vcpu_mtrr_init(vcpu);
> vcpu_load(vcpu);
> --
> 2.23.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-03 21:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-03 15:16 [PATCH v2 0/6] kvm/split_lock: Add feature split lock detection support in kvm Xiaoyao Li
2020-02-03 15:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] x86/split_lock: Add and export get_split_lock_detect_state() Xiaoyao Li
2020-02-03 21:45 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-02-03 15:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] x86/split_lock: Add and export split_lock_detect_set() Xiaoyao Li
2020-02-03 15:16 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] kvm: x86: Emulate split-lock access as a write Xiaoyao Li
2020-02-03 20:54 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-02-04 2:55 ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-02-11 12:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-02-11 13:22 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-11 13:34 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-02-11 14:02 ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-02-11 14:34 ` David Laight
2020-02-27 0:11 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-12 11:42 ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-12 15:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-02-03 15:16 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] kvm: vmx: Extend VMX's #AC handding for split lock in guest Xiaoyao Li
2020-02-03 21:14 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-02-04 6:46 ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-02-10 21:30 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-02-03 15:16 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] kvm: x86: Emulate MSR IA32_CORE_CAPABILITIES Xiaoyao Li
2020-02-03 21:43 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2020-02-04 9:19 ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-02-04 9:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-11 3:52 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-02-11 12:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-03 15:16 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] x86: vmx: virtualize split lock detection Xiaoyao Li
2020-02-03 15:58 ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-02-03 18:52 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-02-03 21:42 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-02-04 2:52 ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-02-04 5:35 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200203214300.GI19638@linux.intel.com \
--to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).